Search

This study aimed to determine the incidence, pattern, and etiology of dissociated vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function according to the stimulus frequency in dizzy patients. We retrospectively evaluated the results of bithermal caloric tests and video-head impulse tests (vHITs) in 1022 patients with dizziness or vertigo between July 2016 and April 2021. Patients were classified into concordant group (normal or abnormal results on both tests) and discordant group (dissociated results between two tests). Of 1022 patients, discordant group had 159 (16%), comprising abnormal horizontal vHITs with normal caloric responses (n = 36, 23%) and abnormal caloric tests with normal horizontal vHITs (n = 123, 77%). The former group showed similar frequency of peripheral (44%) and central (42%) causes, and more common involvement of bilateral horizontal semicircular canals in central than peripheral causes (86.7 vs 37.5%, p = 0.005). The most common peripheral causes were Meniere's disease and chronic vestibular neuritis, while central causes were variable, but mainly affecting the cerebellum. In the latter group, peripheral causes were common (67%), with the main etiologies being Meniere's disease and vestibular neuritis, whereas central causes were found in only 5%. The degree of canal paresis did not differ significantly between patients with central and peripheral causes. Discordant VOR function according to the stimulus frequency was not uncommon in dizzy patients. Specific patterns of VOR dissociation according to the disease etiologies may offer insight into underlying pathophysiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To find out if Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) patients, who have peripheral vestibular as well as peripheral somatosensory impairment, have worse postural balance than those who do not. Methods: We studied 32 patients with various CMT phenotypes and genotypes. Vestibular function was measured with the video head impulse test (vHIT) which tests vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain from each of the six semicircular canals in response to rapid head rotations. Postural balance was evaluated with a battery of four postural tests with emphasis on the modified clinical test of sensory integration in balance (mCTSIB). Results: Half of the 32 patients had some impairment of vestibular function ranging from mild, affecting only 1–2 semicircular canals, to almost total affecting all 6 semicircular canals. Their mCTSIB scores correlated with VOR gain from the vertical rather than from the lateral semicircular canals. The worse the vertical VOR gain the worse the mCTSIB score. Conclusion: We propose that any CMT patient could have clinically inapparent vestibular impairment that can be easily measured with the vHIT. This vestibular impairment could be contributing to their imbalance and could respond to a focused vestibular rehabilitation program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) of < 0.6, measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT), is one of the diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) according to the Báràny Society. Several VHIT systems are commercially available, each with different techniques of tracking head and eye movements and different methods of gain calculation. This study compared three different VHIT systems in patients diagnosed with BV. Methods: This study comprised 46 BV patients (diagnosed according to the Báràny criteria), tested with three commercial VHIT systems (Interacoustics, Otometrics and Synapsys) in random order. Main outcome parameter was VOR gain as calculated by the system, and the agreement on BV diagnosis (VOR gain < 0.6) between the VHIT systems. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were analysed separately, to determine whether these parameters could have influenced differences in outcome between VHIT systems. Results: VOR gain in the Synapsys system differed significantly from VOR gain in the other two systems [F(1.256, 33.916) = 35.681, p < 0.000]. The VHIT systems agreed in 83% of the patients on the BV diagnosis. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were not likely to have influenced the above mentioned results. Conclusion: To conclude, using different VHIT systems in the same BV patient can lead to clinically significant differences in VOR gain, when using a cut-off value of 0.6. This might hinder proper diagnosis of BV patients. It would, therefore, be preferred that VHIT systems are standardised regarding eye and head tracking methods, and VOR gain calculation algorithms. Until then, it is advised to not only take the VOR gain in consideration when assessing a VHIT trial, but also look at the raw traces and the compensatory saccades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers the information on the head impulse test as it was first described as a clinical bedside test in 1988. Topics discussed including the evaluation of function of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR); development of smaller cameras with higher spatial and temporal resolution with the help of with the help of smartphone technology; and the ICS Impulse and the EyeSeeCamHIT as the commercial devices.