Search

Background: The proteins contactin (CNTN) 1-6 are synaptic proteins for which there is evidence that they are dysregulated in neurodegenerative dementias. Less is known about CNTN changes and differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of dementias, which can provide important information about alterations of the CNTN network and be of value for differential diagnosis., Methods: We developed a mass spectrometry-based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method to simultaneously determine all six CNTNs in CSF samples using stable isotope-labeled standard peptides. The analytical performance of the method was evaluated for peptide stability, dilution linearity and precision. CNTNs were measured in 82 CSF samples from patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 19), behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, n = 18), Parkinson's disease dementia/dementia with Lewy bodies (PDD/DLB, n = 18) and non-neurodegenerative controls (n = 27) and compared with core AD biomarkers., Results: The MRM analysis revealed down-regulation of CNTN2 (fold change (FC) = 0.77), CNTN4 (FC = 0.75) and CNTN5 (FC = 0.67) in bvFTD and CNTN3 (FC = 0.72), CNTN4 (FC = 0.75) and CNTN5 (FC = 0.73) in PDD/DLB compared to AD. CNTN levels strongly correlated with each other in controls (r = 0.73), bvFTD (r = 0.86) and PDD/DLB (r = 0.70), but the correlation was significantly lower in AD (r = 0.41). CNTNs in AD did not show correlation even with core AD biomarkers. Combined use of CNTN1-6 levels increased diagnostic performance of AD core biomarkers., Conclusions: Our data show CNTNs differentially altered in dementias and indicate CNTN homeostasis being selectively dysregulated in AD. The combined use of CNTNs with AD core biomarkers might help to improve differential diagnosis., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: PO received research support from the ALS Association (24-SGP-691, 23-PPG-674–2), ALS Finding a Cure, the Charcot Foundation, the DZNE Innovation-to-Application program and consulting fees from LifeArc and Fundamental Pharma. PO and MO received support from the Cure Alzheimer Fund. MO received research support from German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FTLDc 01GI1007A), the EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Diseases networks Genfi-Prox (01ED2008A), the EU (MOODMARKER 01EW2008), the German Research Foundation/DFG (SFB1279), the foundation of the state Baden-Württemberg (D.3830), Boehringer Ingelheim Ulm University BioCenter (D.5009), and the Thierry Latran Foundation. Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Ulm University approved the study (approval no. 20/10). Consent to participate: All patients gave written informed consent to be included in the study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: Early-stage behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is often misdiagnosed, highlighting the need for new diagnostic instruments. Based on the revised diagnostic criteria for bvFTD, we developed the Behavioural Dysfunction Questionnaire (BDQ). In this explorative study, we aimed to determine the best scoring and analytical method for the BDQ to discriminate between bvFTD and non-bvFTD patients., Materials and Methods: 34 patients with early-stage bvFTD, 56 with early-stage Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) and 41 with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited. We calculated BDQ-items with or without inclusion of a time criterion: (a) without time criterion, (b) with 10 years' time criterion (symptom presence less than 10 years), and (c) with 3 years' time criterion (symptom presentation within the first 3 years). Using these three differently calculated items, we generated six variables, i.e. 3*2 [BDQ-Global Score (BDQ-GS; domains average score); BDQ-Global Domain Score (BDQ-GDS; domains categorical score)]. Then, we performed univariate and bivariate (BDQ-GS and BDQ-GDS combined) ROC analyses., Results: Models including BDQ-GS, BDQ-GDS or both variables combined discriminated similarly between groups. In contrast, models without time criterion or with 10 years' time criterion discriminated better than models including variables with 3 years' time criterion. These models discriminated highly (AUC = 85.98-87.78) between bvFTD and MDD and bvFTD and ADD, respectively., Conclusion: BDQ-scores without any time criterion discriminated highly between early-stage bvFTD and non-bvFTD groups, which could improve the early diagnosis of bvFTD. With its standardised procedure, the BDQ is also appropriate for repeated assessments., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The applause sign, i.e., the inability to execute the same amount of claps as performed by the examiner, was originally reported as a sign specific for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Recent research, however, has provided evidence for the occurrence of the applause sign in various conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the applause sign and correlate its presence with neuropsychological and MRI volumetry findings in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related conditions. The applause sign was elicited with the three clap test (TCT), with a higher score indicating poorer performance. Data were recorded from 272 patients from the cohort of the German consortium for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLDc): 111 with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 98 with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 30 with progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson's syndrome, 17 with corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and 16 with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD). For comparison, 29 healthy elderly control subjects (HC) were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent detailed language and neuropsychological assessment. In a subset of 156 subjects, atlas-based volumetry was performed. The applause sign occurred in all patient groups (40% in PSP, 29.5% in CBS, 25% in ALS/FTD, 13.3% in PPA and 9.0% in bvFTD) but not in healthy controls. The prevalence was highest in PSP patients. It was significantly more common in PSP as compared to bvFTD, PPA and HC. The comparison between the other groups failed to show a significant difference regarding the occurrence of the applause sign. The applause sign was highly correlated to a number of neuropsychological findings, especially to measures of executive, visuospatial, and language function as well as measures of disease severity. TCT scores showed an inverse correlation with the volume of the ventral diencephalon and the pallidum. Furthermore the volume of the ventral diencephalon and pallidum were significantly smaller in patients displaying the applause sign. Our study confirms the occurrence of the applause sign in bvFTD, PSP and CBS and adds PPA and ALS/FTD to these conditions. Although still suggestive of PSP, clinically it must be interpreted with caution. From the correlation with various cognitive measures we suggest the applause sign to be indicative of disease severity. Furthermore we suggest that the applause sign represents dysfunction of the pallidum and the subthalamic nucleus, structures which are known to play important roles in response inhibition.