Search

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can produce life-long disabilities, including anxiety, cognitive, balance, and motor deficits. The experimental model of closed head TBI (cTBI) induced by weight drop/impact acceleration is known to produce hallmark TBI injuries. However, comprehensive long-term characterization of comorbidities induced by graded mild-to- mild/moderate intensities using this experimental cTBI model has not been reported. The present study used two intensities of weight drop (1.0 m and 1.25 m/450 g) to produce cTBI in a rat model to investigate initial and long-term disability of four comorbidities: anxiety, cognitive, vestibulomotor, and spinal reflex that related to spasticity. TBI and sham injuries were produced under general anesthesia. Time for righting recoveries post-TBI recorded to estimate duration of unconsciousness, revealed that the TBI mild/moderate group required a mean of 1 min 27 sec longer than the values observed for noninjured sham animals. Screening magnetic resonance imaging images revealed no anatomical changes, mid-line shifts, or hemorrhagic volumes. However, compared to sham injuries, significant long-term anxiety, cognitive, balance, and physiological changes in motor reflex related to spasticity were observed post-TBI for both TBI intensities. The longitudinal trajectory of anxiety and balance disabilities tested at 2, 4, 8, and 18 weeks revealed progressively worsening disabilities. In general, disability magnitudes were proportional to injury intensity for three of the four measures. A natural hypothesis would pose that all disabilities would increase incrementally relative to injury severity. Surprisingly, anxiety disability progressed over time to be greater in the mildest injury. Collectively, translational implications of these observations suggest that patients with mild TBI should be evaluated longitudinally at multiple time points, and that anxiety disorder could potentially have a particularly low threshold for appearance and progressively worsen post-injury.

The behavioral and histological effects of the lateral fluid percussion (LFP) brain injury model were compared with the weight drop impact-acceleration model with 10 min of secondary hypoxia (WDIA + H). LFP injury resulted in significant motor deficits on the beam walk and inclined plane, and memory deficits on the radial arm maze and Morris water maze. Motor deficits following LFP remained throughout 6 weeks of behavioral testing. WDIA + H injury produced significant motor deficits on the beam walk and inclined plane immediately following injury, but these effects were transient and recovered by 14 days post-injury. In contrast to the LFP injury, the WDIA + H injured animals showed no memory deficits on the radial arm maze and Morris water maze. In order to determine if the differences in behavioral outcome between models were due to differences in injury mechanism or injury severity, 10 LFP-injured animals were matched with 10 WDIA-injured animals based on injury severity (i.e., time to regain righting reflex after brain injury). The LFP-matched injury group showed greater impairment than the WDIA + H matched injury group on the radial arm maze and Morris water maze. Histological examination of LFP-injured brains with Fluoro-Jade staining 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days post-injury revealed degenerating neurons in the cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, caudate-putamen, brainstem, and cerebellum, with degenerating fibers tracts in the corpus callosum and other major tracts throughout the brain. Fluoro-Jade staining following WDIA+H injury revealed damage to fibers in the optic tract, lateral olfactory tract, corpus callosum, anterior commissure, caudate-putamen, brain stem, and cerebellum. While both models produce reliable and characteristic behavioral and neuronal pathologies, their differences are important to consider when choosing a brain injury model.

To evaluate new pharmacologic agents with potentially beneficial effects on posttraumatic spinal cord function, we used a modified weight drop (WD) technique to induce spinal cord injuries. These contusive spinal cord injuries in the rat closely mimic the human clinicopathologic situation. Especially for drug screening purposes, the moderate and mild injuries are of interest, as both the beneficial and potentially harmful effects of experimental treatment can be detected. In this study, we describe two new functional tests that were particularly designed to detect small differences in spinal cord function after moderate and mild injuries. First, for examination of locomotion, a computer analysis of the thoracolumbar height (TLH) was designed. Second, for investigation of the conduction properties of the injured rat spinal cord, we measured rubrospinal motor evoked potentials (MEP). The efficacy of the new assessment techniques to monitor spinal cord function was compared to Tarlov scores and to morphometric analysis of preserved white matter at the injury site. The results of this study indicated that for behavioral analysis, TLH measurements as compared with Tarlov rating appeared to be more sensitive for exact and objective discrimination between small differences in motor function. Amplitudes of the rubrospinal MEP, but not latencies or the number of peaks, proved to be most sensitive to determine subtle differences in posttraumatic spinal cord function. A significant linear correlation was found between TLH and amplitude of the rubrospinal MEP. We conclude that for objective assessment of the spinal cord after moderate and mild contusive injury, TLH and rubrospinal MEP amplitudes are very valuable measures to demonstrate small functional differences.

In the United States 258,000 people were injured in 2004 in motor vehicle accidents that were caused by drivers under the influence of alcohol. The majority of these drivers were binge drinkers, most notably young people who tend to drink heavily during the weekends, but rarely drink alcohol during the week. Since a large proportion of the injuries involved head injuries, the present study aimed at investigating the influence of binge alcohol drinking on mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in an animal model. Mice had access to 0%, 7.5%, 15%, or 30% alcohol solutions for 48 consecutive hours once a week for 4 weeks as the sole source of fluids (the remaining time they drank water). Three experiments were done. For the first one (alcohol-mTBI-alcohol) the animals were subjected to a controlled mTBI injury by applying a closed-head weight drop, or a sham procedure. After the mTBI/sham-mTBI the animals got alcohol and /water for the same regimen for 4 additional weeks. In the second experiment (alcohol only) after the 4 weeks of drinking blood samples were collected, at the same time as the animals that underwent sham-mTBI or mTBI procedures. In the third experiment (mTBI-alcohol) the mice were subjected to mTBI/sham-mTBI without any treatment, and after mTBI they had alcohol for 4 weeks in the same regimen as in the previous experiments. At the end of the pharmacological treatment all animals were assessed using different behavioral tests. mTBI mice exhibited lower memory ability in the Y-maze, higher anxiety in the elevated plus maze, and lower retention in the passive avoidance test than sham-mTBI animals. Alcohol reversed these effects at all doses. The results suggest that alcohol drinking before trauma might have a protective effect on recovery from brain trauma, but not if consumed after the trauma.

We have previously shown that a small percentage of long descending propriospinal tract (LDPT) axons are spared, whereas few short thoracic propriospinal (TPS) fibers survive 2 weeks following severe (50 mm weight drop) low thoracic spinal cord contusion injury (SCI). Here, we extended those findings to a moderate (25 mm weight drop) T9 SCI and assessed the effects of this lesion severity on propriospinal tract fibers at different time periods after injury. We anterogradely labeled fibers with fluororuby (FR) or WGA-HRP to determine their location and number 2, 4, 6, and 16 weeks post-SCI. Findings were compared with non-injured controls. At chronic time points, surviving FR-labeled LDPT fibers rostral to the injury remained as reactive endings or as putative regenerative sprouts. Caudal to the injury, spared LDPT fibers ran along a rim of lateral and ventral white matter, and ended as small abnormal-appearing putative terminal boutons or reactive endings within the intermediate gray matter of lumbosacral cord, with little axonal arborization and no evidence of injury-induced sprouting. One striking difference in the WGA-HRP experimental operates was the increased density of labeling of spared axons within the white matter caudal to the injury compared to controls. This labeling pattern was reminiscent of the labeling found after axotomy in studies by others, and raises a question as to contusion injury-induced impaired axonal transport. We hypothesize that axonal sprouting of axons after partial spinal cord injury seen in previous investigations was not found in the present investigation because of the additional pathological effects of contusion injury, similar to what is observed after traumatic brain injury.

Behavioral assessment after spinal cord contusion has long focused on open field locomotion using modifications of a rating scale developed by Tarlov and Klinger (1954). However, on-going modifications by several groups have made interlaboratory comparison of locomotor outcome measures difficult. The purpose of the present study was to develop an efficient, expanded, and unambiguous locomotor rating scale to standardize locomotor outcome measures across laboratories. Adult rats (n = 85) were contused at T7-9 cord level with an electromagnetic or weight drop device. Locomotor behavior was evaluated before injury, on the first or second postoperative day, and then for up to 10 weeks. Scoring categories and attributes were identified, operationally defined, and ranked based on the observed sequence of locomotor recovery patterns. These categories formed the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) Locomotor Rating Scale. The data indicate that the BBB scale is a valid and predictive measure of locomotor recovery able to distinguish behavioral outcomes due to different injuries and to predict anatomical alterations at the lesion center. Interrater reliability tests indicate that examiners with widely varying behavioral testing experience can apply the scale consistently and obtain similar scores. The BBB Locomotor Rating Scale offers investigators a more discriminating measure of behavioral outcome to evaluate treatments after spinal cord injury.

This study involved a morphometric analysis of an experimental model of spinal cord injury. The spinal cords of rats were injured by a weight drop at T8 level. Animals were sacrificed 4 weeks after injury, and histopathologic examination of the spinal cords was carried out qualitatively and also quantitatively with the aid of computer-assisted morphometry. Total cross-sectional areas of residual gray and white matter were determined at five regularly spaced intervals through the injured cord segment. The histologic findings were correlated with height of weight-drop and motor recovery in the hind limbs at 4 weeks postinjury. The weight-drop injury was found to produce a longitudinally asymmetrical cavitary defect, which was better assessed by a series of cross-sectional profiles than by a single histologic cross-section through the epicenter (site of maximal impact) of the cord injury. There was a strong correlation between height of weight-drop and amount of residual tissue (gray and white matter) at the epicenter. A correlation was also found between height of weight-drop and a composite of residual tissue evaluated at multiple levels through the injury site. By comparison with cross-sectional morphometry at the epicenter, multiple cross-sections, reflecting volume of residual tissue in the longitudinal extent of injury, showed greater statistical correlation with functional (behavioral) outcome. This "volumetric" assessment of the total region of injury is therefore recommended as preferable to a histopathologic evaluation limited to the epicenter.