1. Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) PET/MRI of Prostate Cancer for Noninvasive Evaluation of Aggressiveness: Comparison with Gleason Score in a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial
- Author
-
Martin Andreas Røder, Klaus Brasso, Marie Øbro Fosbøl, Annika Loft, Adam E. Hansen, Jann Mortensen, Helle Hjorth Johannesen, Sorel Kurbegovic, Peter Meidahl Petersen, Jacob Madsen, and Andreas Kjaer
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prostate biopsy ,Urology ,Phases of clinical research ,urologic and male genital diseases ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,neoplasms ,Aged ,Urokinase ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Area under the curve ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Primary tumor ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Urokinase receptor ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Neoplasm Grading ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between uptake of the PET ligand (68)Ga-NOTA-AE105, targeting the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and Gleason score in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Methods: Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) or previously diagnosed with PCa were prospectively enrolled in this phase 2 trial. A combination of uPAR PET and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) was performed, and the SUV in the primary tumor, as delineated by mpMRI, was measured by 2 independent readers. The correlation between the SUV and the Gleason score obtained by biopsy was assessed. Results: A total of 27 patients had histologically verified PCa visible on mpMRI and constituted the study population. There was a positive correlation between the SUV(max) and the Gleason score (Spearman ρ = 0.55; P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.67–1.00) for discriminating a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 3 + 4 from a Gleason score of less than or equal to 3 + 3. A cutoff for the tumor SUV(max) could be established with a sensitivity of 96% (79%–99%) and a specificity of 75% (30%–95%) for detecting a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 3 + 4. For discriminating a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 4 + 3 from a Gleason score of less than or equal to 3 + 4, a cutoff could be established for detecting a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 4 + 3 with a sensitivity of 93% (69%–99%) and a specificity of 62% (36%–82%). Conclusion: SUV measurements from uPAR PET in primary tumors, as delineated by mpMRI, showed a significant correlation with the Gleason score, and the tumor SUV(max) was able to discriminate between low-risk Gleason score profiles and intermediate risk Gleason score profiles with a high diagnostic accuracy. Consequently, uPAR PET/MRI could be a promising method for the noninvasive evaluation of PCa and might reduce the need for repeated biopsies (e.g., in active surveillance).
- Published
- 2020