Search

Radioembolization is an established treatment modality that has been subjected to many improvements over the last decade. Developments are occurring at a high pace, affecting patient selection and treatment. The aim of this review is therefore to provide an overview of current practice, with a focus on recent developments in the field of radioembolization. Several practical issues and recommendations in the application of radioembolization will be discussed, ranging from patient selection to treatment response and future applications., (© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Unlabelled: (166)Ho-poly(l-lactic acid) microspheres allow for quantitative imaging with MR imaging or SPECT for microsphere biodistribution assessment after radioembolization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate SPECT- and MR imaging-based dosimetry in the first patients treated with (166)Ho radioembolization., Methods: Fifteen patients with unresectable, chemorefractory liver metastases of any origin were enrolled in this phase 1 study and were treated with (166)Ho radioembolization according to a dose escalation protocol (20-80 Gy). The contours of all liver segments and all discernible tumors were manually delineated on T2-weighted posttreatment MR images and registered to the posttreatment SPECT images (n = 9) or SPECT/CT images (n = 6) and MR imaging-based R2* maps (n = 14). Dosimetry was based on SPECT (n = 15) and MR imaging (n = 9) for all volumes of interest, tumor-to-nontumor (T/N) activity concentration ratios were calculated, and correlation and agreement of MR imaging- and SPECT-based measurements were evaluated., Results: The median overall T/N ratio was 1.4 based on SPECT (range, 0.9-2.8) and 1.4 based on MR imaging (range, 1.1-3.1). In 6 of 15 patients (40%), all tumors had received an activity concentration equal to or higher than the normal liver (T/N ratio ≥ 1). Analysis of SPECT and MR imaging measurements for dose to liver segments yielded a high correlation (R(2) = 0.91) and a moderate agreement (mean bias, 3.7 Gy; 95% limits of agreement, -11.2 to 18.7)., Conclusion: With the use of (166)Ho-microspheres, in vivo dosimetry is feasible on the basis of both SPECT and MR imaging, which enables personalized treatment by selective targeting of inadequately treated tumors.

Unlabelled: Currently, there is no consensus on the use of (90)Y radioembolization for salvage patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available data on tumor response and survival after (90)Y radioembolization for this group of patients., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), Excerpta Medica (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Library (September 2012) with synonyms for "radioembolization" and "colorectal cancer liver metastases." Results were described separately for patient cohorts treated with (90)Y radioembolization as monotherapy and with (90)Y radioembolization in combination with chemotherapy., Results: The search yielded 13 relevant articles for systematic review on (90)Y radioembolization as monotherapy and 13 relevant articles on (90)Y radioembolization combined with chemotherapy. Disease control rates (i.e., complete response, partial response, and stable disease) ranged from 29% to 90% for (90)Y radioembolization as monotherapy and from 59% to 100% for (90)Y radioembolization combined with chemotherapy. Heterogeneity in the data prohibited pooling of response rates. Survival proportions at 12 mo ranged from 37% to 59% for (90)Y radioembolization as monotherapy and from 43% to 74% for (90)Y radioembolization combined with chemotherapy., Conclusion: In the studies included in this systematic review, approximately 50% of salvage patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases survive more than 12 mo after treatment with (90)Y radioembolization, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Heterogeneity between studies has unfortunately prohibited pooling of data. Future research will discern the precise role of (90)Y radioembolization in general clinical practice in comparison with chemotherapy.

Unlabelled: In hepatic (90)Y radioembolization, pretreatment (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) nuclear imaging is used for lung shunt analysis, evaluation of extrahepatic deposition, and sometimes for treatment planning, using a partition model. A high level of agreement between pretreatment (99m)Tc-MAA distribution and final (90)Y-microsphere distribution is assumed. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of pretreatment (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT to predict intrahepatic posttreatment (90)Y-microsphere distribution., Methods: Volumes of interest (VOIs) were delineated on pretreatment contrast-enhanced CT or MR images according to Couinaud liver segmentation. All VOIs were registered to the (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT and (90)Y SPECT images. The (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT and (90)Y SPECT activity counts were normalized to the total administered activity of (90)Y. For each VOI, this practice resulted in a predictive amount of (90)Y (MBq/cm(3)) based on (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT in comparison with an actual amount of (90)Y based on (90)Y SPECT. Bland-Altman analysis was used to investigate the agreement of the activity distribution between (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT and (90)Y SPECT., Results: A total of 39 procedures (225 VOIs) in 31 patients were included for analysis. The overall mean difference between pretreatment and posttreatment distribution of activity concentration for all segments was -0.022 MBq/cm(3) with 95% limits of agreement of -0.581 to 0.537 MBq/cm(3) (-28.9 to 26.7 Gy absorbed dose). A difference of >10%, >20%, and >30% of the mean activity per milliliter was found in, respectively, 153 (68%), 97 (43%), and 72 (32%) of the 225 segments. In every (99m)Tc-MAA procedure, at least 1 segment showed an under- or overestimation of >10%. The position of the catheter tip during administrations, as well as the tumor load of the liver segments, significantly influenced the disagreement., Conclusion: In current clinical practice, (99m)Tc-MAA distribution does not accurately predict final (90)Y activity distribution. Awareness of the importance of catheter positioning and adherence to specific recommendations may lead to optimization of individualized treatment planning based on pretreatment imaging.