4 results
Search Results
2. Sets characterized by missing sums and differences in dilating polytopes.
- Author
-
Do, Thao, Kulkarni, Archit, Miller, Steven J., Moon, David, Wellens, Jake, and Wilcox, James
- Subjects
- *
SET theory , *ADDITION (Mathematics) , *POLYTOPES , *INTEGERS , *MATHEMATICAL bounds - Abstract
Text A sum-dominant set is a finite set A of integers such that | A + A | > | A − A | . As a typical pair of elements contributes one sum and two differences, we expect sum-dominant sets to be rare in some sense. In 2006, however, Martin and O'Bryant showed that the proportion of sum-dominant subsets of { 0 , … , n } is bounded below by a positive constant as n → ∞ . Hegarty then extended their work and showed that for any prescribed s , d ∈ N 0 , the proportion ρ n s , d of subsets of { 0 , … , n } that are missing exactly s sums in { 0 , … , 2 n } and exactly 2 d differences in { − n , … , n } also remains positive in the limit. We consider the following question: are such sets, characterized by their sums and differences, similarly ubiquitous in higher dimensional spaces? We generalize the integers in a growing interval to the lattice points in a dilating polytope. Specifically, let P be a polytope in R D with vertices in Z D , and let ρ n s , d now denote the proportion of subsets of L ( n P ) that are missing exactly s sums in L ( n P ) + L ( n P ) and exactly 2 d differences in L ( n P ) − L ( n P ) . As it turns out, the geometry of P has a significant effect on the limiting behavior of ρ n s , d . We define a geometric characteristic of polytopes called local point symmetry, and show that ρ n s , d is bounded below by a positive constant as n → ∞ if and only if P is locally point symmetric. We further show that the proportion of subsets in L ( n P ) that are missing exactly s sums and at least 2 d differences remains positive in the limit, independent of the geometry of P . A direct corollary of these results is that if P is additionally point symmetric, the proportion of sum-dominant subsets of L ( n P ) also remains positive in the limit. Video For a video summary of this paper, please visit http://youtu.be/2M8Qg0E0RAc . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Metrical lower bounds on the discrepancy of digital Kronecker-sequences.
- Author
-
Larcher, Gerhard and Pillichshammer, Friedrich
- Subjects
- *
MATHEMATICAL bounds , *DISCREPANCY theorem , *MATHEMATICAL sequences , *SET theory , *MATHEMATICAL series , *FINITE fields - Abstract
Abstract: Digital Kronecker-sequences are a non-archimedean analog of classical Kronecker-sequences whose construction is based on Laurent series over a finite field. In this paper it is shown that for almost all digital Kronecker-sequences the star discrepancy satisfies for infinitely many , where only depends on the dimension s and on the order q of the underlying finite field, but not on N. This result shows that a corresponding metrical upper bound due to Larcher is up to some term best possible. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Generalized More Sums Than Differences sets
- Author
-
Iyer, Geoffrey, Lazarev, Oleg, Miller, Steven J., and Zhang, Liyang
- Subjects
- *
GENERALIZATION , *SET theory , *PROOF theory , *PERCENTILES , *MATHEMATICAL bounds , *MATHEMATICAL analysis - Abstract
Abstract: Text: A More Sums Than Differences (or sum-dominant) set is a finite set with . Though it was believed that the percentage of subsets of that are sum-dominant tends to zero, Martin and OʼBryant proved a positive percentage is sum-dominant. We generalize their result to other sums and differences. We prove that a positive percent of the time for all nontrivial choices of , and give explicit constructions. We construct sets exhibiting different behavior as more sums/differences are taken. We prove that for any m, a positive percentage of the time. We find the limiting behavior of for an arbitrary set A as and an upper bound on k for such behavior to settle down. Finally, we say A is k-generational sum-dominant if are all sum-dominant. We prove that for any k a positive percentage of sets is k-generational, and no set is k-generational for all k. Video: For a video summary of this paper, please click here or visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERSMlrEAijY;list=UUfJicAn0WSCOS0IZWMy7HsA;index=1;feature=plcp. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.