Search

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of secondary caesarean section in induced versus spontaneous labour in the second delivery of low risk women who had a vaginal delivery in their first pregnancy. The data were retrospective cohort from an existing regional database, comparing term (between 37 and 42 gestational weeks) second deliveries in cephalic position in women who had previously given vaginal birth. Diabetes, hypertension and multiple pregnancy were excluded as were those with a birth weight less than 2500 g or more than 4500 g. The difference was not significant when induction was performed after 41 weeks. The results showed a total number of 29693 deliveries were included, 21243 in spontaneous labour and 8450 after induction of labour. In the spontaneous group 312 (1.5%) underwent secondary caesarean section, as compared to 237 (2.8%) in the induced group, p < 0.001, OR 1.93 (95% confidence interval 1.63-2.29). It was concluded that elective induction of labour in low risk women who have previously given vaginal birth is associated with an almost doubled rate of secondary caesarean section if performed before 41 weeks.

We analysed retrospectively the link between the incidence of epidural analgesia and the frequency distribution of instrumental delivery, caesarean section, labour induction and parity in a selected group of women with a low risk labour profile in all (85) obstetric units in Flanders (Northern Belgium). A group of 104 932 women with presumed low risk labour profile was subjected to analysis. The main outcome measures were the incidence of obstetric intervention in each obstetric unit in relation to the extent of their use of epidural analgesia. There was a wide variation in the rate of epidural analgesia (3-75%), labour induction 'for convenience' (4-48%) and instrumental delivery (4-50%) among the Flemish obstetric units. The incidence of instrumental delivery in a given unit was greatly influenced by the rate of epidural analgesia and labour induction for convenience (P0.001). However, the incidence of caesarean section in a given unit was not determined by either the rates of epidural, labour induction, attempted instrumental delivery or the size of the unit.

To describe the obstetric outcome in women at ages >= 45. A retrospective cohort study on a large existing database covering all deliveries in the Flanders region, Belgium, was performed, comparing obstetric outcomes at age 25, 35, 40 and 45 or older, for the period 2005-2010. In the period studied, 421 women gave birth at maternal age >= 45 vs 3,405, 15,206, 22,586 at ages 40, 35 and 25, respectively. With advancing maternal age, a significant linear increase for low birth weight (< 2,500 g) and preterm delivery (< 37, < 35 weeks and < 29 weeks), maternal hypertension and diabetes, both primary and secondary caesarean section, was noted. Between ages 40 and >= 45, both fetal and early neonatal death demonstrated a significant rise from 4.9/1,000 and 1.8/1,000 to 26/1,000 and 9.5/1,000, respectively. With advancing maternal age, a gradual but not statistically significant decline in the proportion of male fetuses was noted, from 51.6% at 25, to 47.2% in the oldest group. Multivariate analysis confirmed advanced maternal age to be a significant factor in low birth weight, preterm delivery, hypertension, diabetes, caesarean section and perinatal mortality. In Flanders, mothers at age 45 and older have a significantly increased risk for low birth weight, preterm delivery, hypertension, diabetes, caesarean section and perinatal mortality.