Search

Purpose: The aim of the study was the quantitative pharmacokinetic evaluation of drug release from pretreated amniotic membrane (AM) in vitro., Methods: Cryopreserved AM pieces soaked in 3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution were mounted in vertical Franz-diffusion cell system equipped with autosampler. In vitro release of ofloxacin was determined by quantitative absorbance measurement carried out with a UV spectrophotometer (wavelength 287 nm). Three groups were created according to the duration of soaking: 60 (Group 1), 120 (Group 2), and 180 (Group 3) minutes. Released amount of ofloxacin pro 1 cm(2) of AM (μg/cm(2)) was calculated in the period of 1 to 450 min., Results: Ofloxacin was detectable in the acceptor phase 1 min after mounting in all groups. Until 120 min, rapid increase of released ofloxacin could be observed. From 120 to 450 min, the amount of released ofloxacin showed a slower increasing pattern. Released ofloxacin in Group 1 was significantly lower than in Group 2 after 90 min (19.4±10.4 μg/cm(2), 51.6±20.7 μg/cm(2), respectively, P=0.044). In Group 3, cumulative drug release was higher than in Group at all timepoints. No significant difference could be demonstrated between Groups 2 and 3 at only 1 min timepoint., Conclusion: Significant ofloxacin reservoir capacity of a single human amniotic layer could be demonstrated in vitro. AM acted as an ofloxacin slow release device for upto 7 h in vitro, depending on the duration of pretreatment of AM. Individual pretreatment of AM could increase beneficial effects of AM transplantation, especially in infectious keratitis.

Purpose: We investigated whether an optimized combination of oral and topical levofloxacin would lead to higher levofloxacin concentrations in aqueous humor., Methods: Fifteen patients with cataracts in both eyes began topical treatment at 1 week before the first surgery and oral treatment at 1 day before the first surgery. On the day of surgery, they received oral and topical levofloxacin at 4 h and 1 h before surgery, respectively. Two days after the first operation, we performed cataract surgery on the second eye with the same drug administration protocol., Results: Postsurgery concentrations of levofloxacin in the aqueous humor of the first and second eyes were 2.87±0.89 μg/mL (mean±standard deviation, n=15) and 3.76±1.32 μg/mL, respectively; the levofloxacin level in the second eye was significantly higher than that in the first eye (P=0.0085)., Conclusions: Our protocol to achieve high aqueous humor concentrations of levofloxacin may be favorable in preventing endophthalmitis after eye surgery.

Purpose: To evaluate the time course of drug concentrations achieved in aqueous (AQ), vitreous (V), and serum (S) compartments after oral administration of linezolid and levofloxacin., Design: Randomized, clinical trial., Settings: Clinical practice., Patient Population: Sixteen patients (16 eyes) undergoing vitrectomy who had not had a prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups., Intervention: AQ, V, and S samples were obtained from all subjects after single concomitant doses of linezolid 600 mg and levofloxacin 750 mg between 1 and 12 h before the procedure: group A = 1-3 h; group B = 3-6 h; group C = 6-9 h; group D = 9-12 h., Main Outcome Measures: AQ, V, and S concentrations of linezolid and levofloxacin., Results: Overall mean concentrations ± standard deviation (μg/mL) achieved by linezolid in AQ, V, and S compartments were 3.32 ± 2.06, 2.98 ± 1.87, and 7.91 ± 3.94, respectively. Overall mean concentrations ±standard deviation (μg/mL) achieved by levofloxacin in AQ, V, and S compartments were 2.19 ± 1.92, 1.95 ± 1.27, and 7.38 ± 3.47, respectively., Conclusions: Single concomitant doses of linezolid and levofloxacin achieved AQ and V concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of common ocular gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens up to 12 h after administration. The combination of linezolid and levofloxacin represents a viable option for the prophylaxis and management of endophthalmitis.

Introduction: Ocular penetration of newer fluoroquinolones (FQs) has not been fully investigated in humans, especially in regard to conjunctival tissue penetration. The aim of our study was to evaluate the conjunctival permeability of 3 FQs, which do not contain benzalkonium chloride, using excised pterygium tissue., Methods: Patients undergoing pterygium surgery received a single application of one of the following: 0.5% moxifloxacin (MFLX), 0.3% gatifloxacin (GFLX), or 0.5% levofloxacin (LVFX). Samples of conjunctival tissue were collected 10, 30, or 45 min following administration of the study drug. Each sample was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography, and drug concentrations were measured over time., Results: Conjunctival concentration of all 3 FQs was highest 10 minutes after instillation, then gradually decreased. At all time points, MFLX showed the highest conjunctival concentrations among the 3 drugs. Mean MFLX concentrations were 116.7 +/- 28.9, 19.0 +/- 6.3, and 15.9 +/- 4.7 microg/g at 10, 30, and 45 min, respectively, and were statistically greater than GFLX or LVFX concentrations at 10 and 45 min., Conclusions: All tested FQs achieved peak concentrations within 10 min following administration. Initial peak concentrations of MFLX were greater than either GFLX or LVFX, and concentrations of MFLX remained highest among the 3 FQs throughout the 45-min time window.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of 0.3% gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution in preventing bacterial endophthalmitis in rabbits., Methods: Eighty-four (84) albino phakic rabbits were injected unilaterally with 2 x 10(4) colony forming units of Enterococcus faecalis into the anterior chamber. The eyes received 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic ointment or 0.3% gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution with different regimens in three separate experiments: (1) 1 or 3 drops of gatifloxacin every 2 h or a single application of ofloxacin for 1 day; (2) 3 drops/day of gatifloxacin application started at 0, 6, and 24 h postinoculation, or 1 drop at 0 h, and 3 times daily gatifloxacin for the following 3 days; and (3) 1 or 3 drops of gatifloxacin application started at 0 h and no further application for the following 3 days. The control eyes received no treatment in the three experiments. The effectiveness of these different regimens was assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and bacterial colony counts. The ocular penetration of the drugs was determined in a separate experiment, using 36 normal albino rabbits., Results: The concentration-time curves for gatifloxacin and ofloxacin appeared parallel, with mean peak concentrations of 1161 and 219 ng/mL, respectively, at 1 h postinstillation. In Experiment 1, gatifloxacin significantly reduced the inflammation and the number of living bacteria in the aqueous humor, compared with controls, whereas ofloxacin ointment did not. A single application of ofloxacin ointment was not better than 1 drop of gatifloxacin. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the effectiveness of gatifloxacin decreased as the interval between the inoculation and the onset of treatment increased. In Experiment 3, only 3 drops of gatifloxacin on day 1 kept the inflammation significantly lower than that in the control for 4 days., Conclusions: Immediate postoperative prophylaxis would likely be effective in reducing the risk of enterococcal endophthalmitis by topical gatifloxacin.

Purpose: The chemotherapeutic effects and pharmacokinetics properties of WP-0405 (a thermo-setting in situ 0.3% ofloxacin-containing ophthalmic gel) and ofloxacin (a conventional 0.3% ofloxacin solution) on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis were compared in a rabbit model., Method: The single-instillation pharmacokinetics of WP-0405 and ofloxacin in the cornea, aqueous humor, conjunctiva, and iris-ciliary body were determined in normal rabbit eyes. To compare the duration of antimicrobial action, WP-0405 or ofloxacin was instilled oncedaily in an early-treatment model of keratitis, and corneas were either removed immediately or 4 or 8 h postinstillation. In another experiment, WP-0405 was instilled two or three times daily to compare its antibiotic efficacy with three-times daily instillation of ofloxacin in the same early-treatment model of keratitis; corneas were then removed after determining the extent of the abscess area. In another experiment, WP-0405 was instilled four or eight times daily to compare its effects with eight-times daily instillation of ofloxacin in a late-treatment model of keratitis, and corneas were removed. The number of viable bacteria in the corneas was determined in all experiments., Results: Cmax and AUC0- in tissues treated with WP-0405 were 1.5-3.4-fold and 1.8-2.9-fold greater than those treated with ofloxacin, respectively. WP-0405 significantly reduced the number of viable bacteria for up to 8 h after a single instillation. WP-0405 not only significantly reduced the number of viable bacteria, but also the size of the abscess area at the same frequency of instillation. When compared to ofloxacin, WP-0405 exhibited an approximately equivalent antibiotic effect, with fewer administrations., Conclusions: As a result of its pharmacokinetics, WP-0405 had a more potent, longer-acting antibiotic effect than did ofloxacin. Furthermore, because of its lower required instillation frequency, which would improve patient compliance, WP-0405 has great potential therapeutic benefits.

The aqueous penetration of the commercial preparations of the fluoroquinolone antibiotics ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin were compared following topical dosing in a rabbit model. Levofloxacin achieved the highest aqueous concentrations, with a mean aqueous level of 4.8014 microcg/mL (p = 0.002, p = 0.00002, p = 0.015.) Ofloxacin (2.5136 microcg/mL) and gatifloxacin (2.4817 microcg/mL) achieved statistically equal aqueous concentrations (p = 0.479). Ciprofloxacin reached the lowest levels in the aqueous humor (0.9616 microcg/mL, p = 0.00002, 0.00004, 0.008). Gatifloxacin alone achieved concentrations in excess of the MIC90s of gram-positive pathogens of concern.

Ocular penetration of two topical antibiotics used to treat bacterial conjunctivitis was assessed in adult volunteers scheduled for cataract surgery. In this randomized, parallel-group study, patients instilled trimethoprim sulfate 0.1%/polymyxin B (n = 23) or ofloxacin 0.3% (n = 25) QID for 3 days, plus 4 instillations in the hour before surgery. Analysis of aqueous humor samples obtained during surgery showed a 2.4-fold greater concentration of ofloxacin over trimethoprim (1.135 micro g/ml vs 0.470 micro g/ml; P <.0001). The greater concentration of ofloxacin in ocular tissue coupled with its superior antibacterial activity profile supports its use as an alternative to trimethoprim/polymyxin B for treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

This study compared the precision and accuracy of 4 tear sampling methods. In vivo, albino rabbits were treated with single bilateral eye drops ofofloxacin 0.3% solution, 3 hr after which tear samples were collected using capillary tubes (CT), surgical sponges (SS), or tear strips for 15 sec (15sTS) or 60 sec (60sTS). In vitro, CT, SS, and tear strips were spiked with known volumes of ofloxacin solution in order to assess the bioanalytical accuracy of each technique. Ofloxacin levels were quantified by HPLC in all samples. Results showed that tear volumes and ofloxacin masses sampled in vivo depended on sampling method. Tear volume followed the rank order 60sTS > 15sTS > SS > CT. The volume collected by 60sTS exceeded precorneal tear volume. Ofloxacin mass followed the order 60sTS approximately 15sTS > SS > CT. Tear concentrations (mean +/- SD; N = 12) were 3.28 +/- 3.76 microg/g for 60sTS, 10.3 +/- 10.0 microg/g for 15sTS, 9.75 +/- 8.04 microg/g for SS, and 5.83 +/- 3.35 microg/g for CT. In vitro, SS, 15sTS, and 60sTS yielded accuracies of 103-107% and coefficients of variation (CV) < 9%. CT was only 85% accurate with a CV of 31%, indicating incomplete extraction during analysis. We concluded from this study that: 1) rabbit tear sampling by SS was rapid, easy, accurate, precise, and easily analyzable; 2) sampling by CT or 15sTS was accurate, but may require aggressive extraction (for CT) or be affected by tear flow rate (for 15sTS); and 3) tear sampling by 60sTS underestimated actual tear concentrations.

Ofloxacin is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic with good ocular penetration. We investigated the potential for retinal toxicity associated with increased intraocular penetration following intensive topical, oral, and combined topical and oral administration. We confirmed ofloxacin concentrations in aqueous and vitreous following these forms of administration. Rabbits received either topical, oral, or a combination of oral and topical ofloxacin. Topical administration consisted of one drop of ofloxacin 0.3% drops given every thirty minutes for a total of eight doses. Oral ofloxacin was administered at a dose of 10 mg (4 mg/kg for average weight 2.5 kg rabbit) every 12 hours for a total of three doses. Six rabbits were followed longitudinally for 4 weeks for evidence of retinal toxicity by indirect ophthalmoscopy and serial ERGs. Electron and light microscopic histopathologic examination of the retina were performed 4 weeks following drug administration. To verify intraocular penetration, ten rabbits received identical dosing schedules followed by HPLC measurement of aqueous and vitreous drug concentrations at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours following dose completion. No evidence of retinal toxicity was detected by indirect ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography, or histopathological examination. Vitreous ofloxacin levels were highest after combined oral and topical administration, peaking at 0.892 microgram/ml 8 hours following dosage completion. The peak vitreous level following oral administration was 0.230 microgram/ml and 0.026 microgram/ml following topical administration. Peak aqueous humor levels were achieved one hour following drug administration and were 11.400 micrograms/ml after topical, 0.206 microgram/ml after oral, and 8.180 micrograms/ml after combined administration. Our study suggests that intensive topical and oral ofloxacin administration does not cause retinal toxicity in rabbits, despite achieving effective aqueous and vitreous humor antimicrobial concentrations.

It is well known that some ocular diseases can be treated more effectively with a collagen shield containing drug. The influence of collagen cross-linking on drug delivery is not known. We determined if collagen cross-linking affects ofloxacin bioavailability at three different collagen shield dissolution times. In this study, the collagen shields were not impregnated in drug but an eye drop was simply instilled after application of collagen shield. A non-cross-linked collagen shield, with a dissolution time of 12 h, disappeared more rapidly from the rabbits' eyes due to proteolysis after application in vivo. On the other hand, the cross-linked collagen shields, with dissolution times of 24 and 72 h, served as an ofloxacin depot and enhanced topical ofloxacin penetration into the cornea and the aqueous humor. As the dissolution times for the cross-linked collagen shield are longer than those of the non-cross-linked type, they serve as drug reservoirs. Therefore, cross-linked collagen shields might be useful ocular drug delivery devices because they can allow drug concentrations to achieve higher levels in the cornea and aqueous humor.

Ofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution or ointment was administered preoperatively to 13 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Mean drug concentrations in conjunctival biopsies were 2.62 and 6.55 micrograms/gm and in aqueous humor samples were 0.36 micrograms/mL and 0.43 micrograms/mL, for ointment and solution respectively. Mean conjunctival concentrations of ofloxacin achieved MIC90 values for 419 gram-positive and gram-negative organisms previously analyzed.