Search

Introduction: Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (MOC) presents many potential advantages, such as significantly less severe side effects than standard regimens, ease of administration, and the delivery of a dose-dense but not necessarily dose-intense treatment. These observations prompted us to evaluate in a retrospective, multicenter study the efficacy and toxicity of MOC in a real-life series of pretreated cancer patients. Methods: The study is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of the activity of single-agent MOC in patients with recurrent or residual epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary. Eligible patients were continuously treated with MOC at 50 mg/day until progression, toxicity, or death. Overall response rate (ORR), stable disease (SD), and disease control rate (DCR) were reported. Results: The study included 62 patients. Three patients reached a complete response rate (5%), 11 had a partial response rate (18), and 15 had stabilization of disease (24) for an ORR of 23% and a DCR of 47%. Patients with low-grade indolent tumors showed an ORR and an SD rate higher than that observed in non-indolent ones (33% vs. 18% and 28% vs. 14%, respectively). Overall, progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 1–9 months). Conclusion: Single-agent MOC is active and very well tolerated in a significant fraction of patients with refractory, recurrent, or residual epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. In the vision of a practical approach, single-agent MOC may be a useful palliative treatment option for patients with poor tolerance to high-dose regimens or widely pretreated. Further studies are needed better to characterize the role of such an approach in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Oral metronomic cyclophosphamide has been used as a single agent or in combination with other drugs for several solid tumors with interesting results in disease palliation and mild to moderate toxicity, notably in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) progressing after systemic chemotherapy. In this paper, we report a review and a metanalysis of heterogeneous data published up to date. Data sources: The literature search was restricted to single-agent MOC. The analysis was conducted through March 2023 by consulting PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and The Cochrane Library databases. Research string and Medical Subject Headings included "ovarian tumor," "ovarian carcinoma," or "ovarian cancer," "fallopian tube cancer," "primary peritoneal cancer," "oral chemotherapy," and "metronomic cyclophosphamide." All articles were assessed for quality by at least two investigators independently, and a < 18 patients sample size cutoff was chosen as a lower limit with a Cohen's kappa statistical coefficient for accuracy and reliability. Metanalysis of selected papers was carried out according to a fixed model. Data summary: The percentage of agreement between investigators on literature study selection was very high, reaching 96.9% with a Cohen's k of 0.929. MOC pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate for recurrent or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer were 18.8% (range 4–44%) and 36.2% (range 16–58.8%), respectively. The mean progressive-free survival and overall survival were 3.16 months (range 1.9 to 5.0 months) and 8.7 months (range 8 to 13 months), respectively. The fixed model metanalysis of selected studies showed a 16% median ORR (12–20% CI, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Single-agent oral cyclophosphamide in EOC holds promise as a treatment option, even in the era of precision medicine. Genetic factors, such as DNA repair gene polymorphisms, may influence treatment response. Combining cyclophosphamide with biological agents such as PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy agents is an area of active investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) may affect adherence to planned chemotherapy treatments and compromise patients' quality of life during the therapy. NEPA is an oral fixed combination of netupitant, a highly-selective NK1-RA and palonosetron, a 5HT3-RA, approved for the prevention of acute and delayed CINV. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NEPA with dexamethasone for CINV prophylaxis in the challenging setting of carboplatin and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy, after failure of prophylaxis with 5HT3 receptor antagonist. Methods: Eligible patients were undergoing carboplatin and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian cancer or urothelial cancer and experienced nausea and/or vomiting after the first cycle of chemotherapy, despite an antiemetic prophylaxis with a 5HT3-RA and dexamethasone. Primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue medication) obtained with NEPA, during the overall phase (0–120 h), after the start of chemotherapy. Results: During the first cycle of chemotherapy, 15 out of 30 (50%) patients did not properly control CINV with a 5HT3-RA plus dexamethasone used as primary antiemetic prophylaxis and then were switched to NEPA from the subsequent cycle. During NEPA administration, 13 out of 15 patients (86.7%) achieved an overall CR (no emesis, no rescue medication). Antiemetic treatment with NEPA was very well tolerated with only two patients (13.3%) that experienced a grade 1 TEAE. Conclusions: Our experience showed that NEPA has proven to be very effective and well tolerated in the prophylaxis of CINV induced by carboplatin-based chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]