1. Spanish Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and Validation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
- Author
-
María Rullán, Alazne Belar, Jorge M. Núñez-Córdoba, Ana Carvajal, Marina Martínez, Irene García, María Arantzamendi, Carlos Centeno, and José Miguel Carrasco
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,inorganic chemicals ,Attitude to Death ,Psychometrics ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Concurrent validity ,Context (language use) ,Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ,Personhood ,Dignity ,Social support ,Cronbach's alpha ,Neoplasms ,Humans ,Medicine ,Translations ,General Nursing ,Aged ,media_common ,Aged, 80 and over ,Psychological Tests ,business.industry ,Discriminant validity ,Reproducibility of Results ,Middle Aged ,Translating ,nervous system diseases ,body regions ,Distress ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Factor Analysis, Statistical ,business ,Stress, Psychological ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) is an instrument to measure sources of distress related to dignity at the end of life.To obtain a Spanish version of the PDI and measure psychometric aspects in patients with advanced cancer.A back-translation method was used to obtain the Spanish version. Inpatients and outpatients with advanced cancer were included. Patients completed the Spanish versions of the PDI (PDI-s), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp-12) instruments. The psychometric properties evaluated were internal consistency; concurrent validity between PDI-s/ESAS, PDI-s/HADS, and PDI-s/FACIT-Sp-12; discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis. The usefulness of the instrument also was tested.A Spanish version of the PDI was obtained. One hundred twenty-four patients completed the study. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the PDI-s was 0.89. The PDI-s significantly correlated with the ESAS (rs = 0.669; P0.001), HADS (rs = 0.788; P0.001), and FACIT-Sp-12 (rs = -0.442; P = 0.008). The instrument distinguished outpatients from inpatients and between patients with differing Karnofsky Performance Status scores (rs = -0.328; P0.001). The test-retest method indicated excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.931). Factor analysis showed three factors accounting for 79.4% of the variance. Factors were labeled psychological and existential distress, physical symptoms and dependency, and social support. Patients had no difficulties in understanding or completing the questionnaire (mean time to complete: 7.2 minutes).The Spanish version of the PDI showed adequate psychometric properties when tested with advanced cancer patients. This research provides a three-factor alternative in Spanish to the PDI.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF