Search

It is widely believed that patients' reluctance to report pain and adhere to treatment recommendations are significant barriers to cancer pain control. However, few investigators have examined barriers to cancer pain management from the cancer patient's perspective. Ambulatory patients with cancer who had experienced cancer-related pain in the previous month or were currently taking analgesics for cancer pain control were asked to participate in this study. Information regarding (a) pain assessment, (b) pain medication use, (c) concerns and barriers to compliance, (d) communication patterns regarding pain and pain control, and (e) demographics were collected during a 10-min structured interview. Approximately 20% of patients with a current cancer diagnosis who were approached reported that they had experienced pain or taken analgesic drugs during the preceding month. Eighty-eight percent of these patients ranked their pain as five or greater (scale, 0-10), and 81% reported impaired function due to pain. Major barriers to effective treatment included forgetfulness, the belief that pain should be tolerated, concerns about side effects, and fear and disdain of dependence, addiction, and tolerance. One-third of patients felt that their pain could not be better controlled than it currently was. Patients reported frequent communication regarding pain and pain control with physicians (52%), nurses (41%), and pharmacists (17%). The low pain prevalence, coupled with high pain intensity and associated dysfunction, appears to be a reflection of patient's unwillingness to report pain of mild to moderate intensity. In addition to previously recognized factors, stoicism and fatalism represent significant barriers to cancer pain control.

An educational program designed to change knowledge in order to change pain management practices and patient outcomes was offered to nurses who provide day-to-day care to patients with cancer in communities in a predominately rural state. A quasi-experimental time-series design was used to measure the effectiveness of the program in changing nurse knowledge, attitude and behavior, and to evaluate the relationships between the outcomes. Data were collected from nurses ( N = 29) and patient charts before ( N = 209) and after ( N = 163) the program. Nurses' knowledge increased, but the change was not statistically significant; the mean percent of correct answer on the three subtests were different and differences persisted throughout the study. Nurses believed that patients should be "pain free". Documentation of behaviors, for example, practice activities, occurred infrequently and showed little change until 6 months after the program. Increase in documentation of pain-intensity ratings, pain location, number of sites of pain, presence of confusion, anxious or depressed mood, sleep, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and general activity were noted. Documentation of the use of a propoxyphene-containing analgesic decreased; increase in the use of hydromorphone methadone and transdermal fentanyl was noted. Analysis of the relationships between correct responses to nurse knowledge questions and documentation of behavior provided interesting, statistically insignificant results that need to be reexamined in future research. Future programs should emphasize analgesic dosing and calculation of equianalgesic doses. Current practices in chart documentation may provide incomplete information regarding change in practice behaviors; more detailed documentation of pain management practices is needed. Nurses who participated in the program anecdotally reported feelings of increased credibility and effectiveness. Although change in behavior is slow to occur, education does make a difference.

Palliative care consultation is the most common model of hospital-based services in the United States, but few studies examine the impact of this model. In a prospective study, we describe the impact of palliative care consultation on symptoms, treatment, and hospital costs. Patients receiving interdisciplinary palliative care consultations from 2002 to 2004 were approached for enrollment; 304 of 395 (77%) patients participated. Measures included diagnosis, treatment decisions, and symptom scores. To test impact on costs, a one-year subset of cases with lengths of stay4 days (n=104) was compared to all available controls (n=1,813) matched on the 3Mtrade mark All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Group, Version 20, and mortality risk scores. Half of the patients were younger than 65 years, 28% were African American, and 61% had cancer. Median Palliative Performance score was 20 (range, 10-100). Recommendations were implemented in 88% of cases; new "do not resuscitate/do not intubate" orders were written for 34% of patients, new comfort care orders for 44%, and 27% were referred for hospice care. Symptom scores improved from Day 1 to Day 3, with greatest improvement in pain (2.6-1.4, P0.001). Compared to matched controls without palliative care consultation, palliative care cases had lower cost per day ($897 vs. $1004, P=0.03). Per diem variable costs were 10.7% less for all palliative care cases and 20.5% less for those with50% hospital days with palliative care consultation. Palliative care consultation is followed by decisions to forego costly treatment and improved symptom scores, and earlier palliative care intervention results in greater cost-savings.

A great deal of effort is being expended at national, state and local levels to improve cancer pain management in the United States. The fact that cancer patients continue to experience "unrelieved pain" is of concern to professional caregivers and families, as well as to the patients themselves. This article describes the content and scope of an educational program for nurses who work in predominantly rural areas. Content of the program and the evaluation process are described in detail in order to provide other caregivers with a model that could be implemented in similar settings.