Search

Background: Hospice is underutilized. Miscommunication, decisional complexity, and misunderstanding around engaging hospice may contribute. Shared decision making (SDM), aided by patient decision aids (PtDAs), can improve knowledge and decision quality. Currently, there are no freely available hospice-specific PtDA to facilitate conversions between patients and providers about hospice care. Objective: To develop a theory-based and unbiased hospice specific PtDA. Design: Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and International Patient Decision Aid Standards, we used a theory-driven, eight-step, iterative, user-centered approach with multistakeholder input to develop a hospice-specific PtDA for anyone facing end-of-life decisions. Subjects: Feedback was obtained from a 10-member Patient Advisory Panel composed of lay patient advisors; focus groups of hospice providers, family caregivers, and patients; and the Palliative Care Research Group at University of Colorado Hospital consisting of palliative care physicians, midlevel providers, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and researchers. Results: There are many challenges in developing an unbiased hospice decision aid, including (1) balancing the provision of education (eligibility, payment) with decisional support, (2) clarifying values and incorporating emotion, (3) ideally representing the potential downsides of hospice, and (4) adequately capturing and describing care alternatives to hospice. Within this context, we developed a 12-page article and 17-minute video PtDAs. The PtDA openly acknowledges the emotional complexity of the decision and incorporates values clarification techniques to help decision makers reflect and evaluate their goals and preferences for end-of-life care. Conclusions: Hospice decision making is complex and emotional, demanding high-quality SDM aided by a formal PtDA. This work resulted in a freely available article and video PtDA for patients considering hospice. The effectiveness and implementation of these tools will be studied in future research. Clinical Trials Registration (NCT03794700 & NCT04458090).

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death for high-risk patients with heart failure (HF), but shocks from these devices can also cause pain and anxiety at the end of life. Although professional society recommendations encourage proactive discussions about ICD deactivation, clinicians lack training in conducting these conversations, and they occur infrequently. Methods: As part of a six-center randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the educational component of a multicomponent intervention shown to increase conversations about ICD deactivation by clinicians who care for a subset of patients with advanced HF. This consisted of a 90-minute training workshop designed to improve the quality and frequency of conversations about ICD management. To characterize its utility as an isolated intervention, we compared HF clinicians' pre- and postworkshop scores (on a 5-point Likert scale) assessing self-reported confidence and skills in specific practices of advance care planning, ICD deactivation discussions, and empathic communication. Results: Forty intervention-group HF clinicians completed both pre- and postworkshop surveys. Preworkshop scores showed high baseline levels of confidence (4.36, standard deviation [SD] = 0.70) and skill (4.08, SD = 0.72), whereas comparisons of pre- and postworkshop scores showed nonsignificant decreases in confidence (−1.16, p = 0.252) and skill (−0.20, p = 0.843) after the training session. Conclusions: Our findings showed no significant changes in self-assessment ratings immediately after the educational intervention. However, our data did demonstrate that HF clinicians had high baseline self-perceptions of their skills in advance care planning conversations and appear to be well-primed for further professional development to improve communication in the setting of advanced HF.

Although the palliative care needs of outpatients with chronic heart failure (HF) are numerous, there is limited published experience in providing outpatient HF palliative care. This article describes the patients seen and the issues addressed in an outpatient palliative care program for patients with HF.Case series involving a retrospective medical record review using descriptive quantitative and qualitative analysis.Over a 3 ½ year time period, 50 patients were seen, resulting in 228 total visits. Fifty percent of patients were seen only once. Fifty-eight percent of patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV HF. Within a year of the initial palliative care visit, 14% of patients died. Depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue, breathlessness, and sleep disturbance were common symptoms addressed during visits. Advance care planning topics were discussed with 48% of patients; hospice and resuscitation status were each discussed with 16% of patients. Fears or concerns about the future arose in 34% of patients. Care coordination was commonly addressed with patients' other health care providers (58%). The most common referrals were to social work (26%) and rehabilitation/physical therapy (20%).Several findings reflect how outpatient HF palliative care differs from that of inpatient hospital-based palliative care. Many of the issues addressed, including care coordination, advance care planning, and psychosocial issues, imply that palliative HF care is complementary to standard HF care at all stages of the disease process and that future programs should consider dedicating a nurse and/or social worker. Research is needed to test how such a care model affects patient-centered outcomes, utilization, and cost.

Regional variation in health care use in the last 6 months of life is well documented. Our objective was to examine whether an association exists between cardiologists' tendencies to discuss palliative care for patients with advanced heart failure and the regional use of health care in the last 6 months of life.We performed a national mail survey of a random sample of 994 eligible Cardiologists from the American Medical Association Masterfile. Hypothetical patient scenarios were used to explore physician management of patient scenarios.We received 614 responses (response rate: 62%). In a 75-year-old with symptomatic chronic heart failure and asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, cardiologists in regions with high use in the last 6 months of life were less likely to have discussions about palliative care (23% versus 32% for comparisons between the highest and lowest quintiles, p = 0.04). Similarly, in an 85 year-old with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an acute exacerbation, cardiologists in high use regions were less likely to have discussions about palliative care (35% versus 47%, p = 0.0008).Despite professional guidelines suggesting that cardiologists discuss palliative care with patients with late stage heart failure, less than half of cardiologists would discuss palliative care in two elderly patients with late-stage heart failure and this guideline discordance was worse in the regions with more health care use in the last 6 months of life.