Search

Background: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder characterized by brittle bones and long bone deformity. Realignment and intramedullary rodding with telescopic rods are indicated for progressive deformity and can help prevent fractures. Rod bending is a reported complication of telescopic rods and a common indication for revision; however, the fate of bent lower extremity telescopic rods in the setting of OI has not been reported., Methods: Patients with OI at a single institution who underwent lower extremity telescopic rod placement with at least 1-year follow-up were identified. Bent rods were identified, and for these bone segments, we collected the location and angle of bend, subsequent telescoping, refracture, increasing angulation of bend, and date of revision., Results: One hundred sixty-eight telescopic rods in 43 patients were identified. Forty-six rods (27.4%) bent during follow-up, with an average angulation of 7.3 (range: 1 to 24) degrees. In patients with severe OI, 15.7% of rods bent compared with 35.7% in nonsevere OI ( P =0.003). The proportion of bent rods was different between independent and nonindependent ambulators (34.1% and 20.5%; P =0.035). Twenty-seven bent rods (58.7%) were revised, with 12 rods (26.0%) revised early (within 90 d). The angulation of rods that were revised early was significantly higher than rods not (14.6 and 4.3 degrees, P <0.001). Of the 34 bent rods not revised early, the average time to revision or final follow-up was 29.1 months. Twenty-five rods (73.5%) continued to telescope, 14 (41.2%) increased in angulation (average 3.2 degrees), and 10 bones (29.4%) refractured. None of the refractures required immediate rod revision. Two bones had multiple refractures., Conclusions: Bending is a common complication of telescopic rods in the lower extremities of patients with OI. It is more common in independent ambulators and patients with nonsevere OI, possibly because of the increased demand placed on the rods. Rods with a small bend and maintained fixation can telescope and need not be an indication for immediate revision., Level of Evidence: Level III-Retrospective review., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The evolution of female authorship in orthopaedic journals is reportedly rising, however, trends in pediatric orthopaedic publications have not been specifically studied, despite a higher proportion of female pediatric orthopaedic surgeons compared with orthopaedics at large. This study aimed to investigate trends in female first and senior authorship in 3 flagship pediatric orthopaedic journals over the past 20 years., Methods: All manuscripts from the "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B, and Journal of Children's Orthopaedics" from 2002 to 2021 were evaluated from Ovid MEDLINE, and the data were extracted. We utilized the sex "Application Program Interface" algorithm to determine the sex of the first and senior authors. χ 2 tests were used to analyze the demographics of the first and senior author cohorts. Fisher exact test was used to assess the trends in male and female authorship, controlling for year and journal., Results: Of a total, 5499 individual first authors and 5794 senior authors were identified. Sex was determined for 83.5% of the authors. Female first authorship increased significantly from 2002 to 2021 (8.8% to 22.4%, P < 0.001), with women being more likely to publish as first authors in more recent years in each journal ( P < 0.001). Female senior authorship did not increase significantly over the same time period (10.8% to 12.8%, P = 0.238). There was significantly more male than female first and senior authors for all journals ( P <0.001 for both first and senior authors)., Conclusions: While female first authorship in prominent pediatric orthopaedic journals has increased significantly from 2002 to 2021, senior authorship has remained stagnant. In addition, female pediatric orthopaedic surgeons publish at rates lower than their prevalence in the field. This study serves as a benchmark for future studies looking at sex and authorship in hopes of better understanding the underlying complex issues., Level of Evidence: Level III., Competing Interests: S.A.T.: Consultant for OrthoPaediatrics, Consultant for Depuy Synthes. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle (LHC) may be treated nonoperatively in a long arm cast, but there is not a standardized evidence-based protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate our nonoperatively treated LHC fractures, determine the risk of subsequent displacement, analyze our practice variability, and develop an evidence-based protocol to safely manage children with LHC fractures and to evaluate potential savings related to this analysis., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic parameters of all patients with LHC fractures at our institution from 2009 to 2015. All patients treated nonoperatively initially were included. We recorded demographic data and calculated the number of visits, casts applied, and radiographs within the first 4 weeks. We also analyzed practice variation among 27 treating providers. The number of children with subsequent displacement needing operative fixation was determined. We also looked at the average duration for each follow-up visit and the charges/costs associated with casting and radiographs., Results: There were 271 children with LHC fractures treated nonoperatively. Twenty-one were excluded because of the lack of adequate radiographs. There were 157 boys and 93 girls (average age 6.7 y). According to the Jakob classification, fracture types were as follows: 1 (230), 2 (20), and 3 (0). Within the first 4 weeks, the average number of visits was 2.6 (range: 1 to 5), average number of casts was 2.4 (range: 1 to 4), and the average number of radiographs was 9.4 (range: 2 to 31). Only 3 patients with LHC fracture type Jakob 1 were taken to the operating room post injury (9, 12, and 15 d, respectively) for subsequent displacement., Conclusion: Displacement in appropriately selected LHC fractures treated nonoperatively was rare (3/250, 1.2%) in this cohort, and the data question the need for multiple visits and radiographs in the first 4 weeks. Optimal follow-up (proposed follow-up at 10 to 15 d after injury and then 4 to 6 wk with radiographs, including an internal oblique view) would be safe, minimize waste, and result in better value-based care., Level of Evidence: Level IV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)