Search

Implantable intramedullary nail lengthening devices (e.g., PRECICE 2 system) have been proposed as alternative method to external fixation for lower limb lengthening surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse our outcomes and complications using the PRECICE 2 (P2) nail system and review them in light of the existing literature. A retrospective multicentre study was conducted on patients <18 years, who were treated for limb lengthening using the P2 system. The inclusion criteria were a limb length discrepancy ≥ 30 mm and a follow-up ≥6 months after the end of treatment. A total of 26 (15 males) patients were included, average age was 14.7 ± 2.3 years; 26 nails (21 femur, 5 tibia) were implanted. The average goal lengthening was 49.4 ± 12.4 mm, while average achieved lengthening was 44.4 ± 11.6 mm. Average distraction and consolidation indexes were 11.9 ± 2.1 days/cm and 25.1 ± 8.1 days/cm, respectively. Nail accuracy and reliability were 91.1% and 88.5%, respectively. A total of five problems (joint contractures), one obstacle (femur fracture) and three complications (hip joint subluxation, deep infection and nail running back) were encountered. The P2 nail system is a valid alternative to external fixator for limb lengthening in young patients with no significant angular or rotation deformities. Our study confirms a favourable complication rate and available evidence from literature suggests a lower complication rate than external fixator systems. Nevertheless, surgeons should keep a watchful eye on risk of joint subluxation and mechanical complications with intramedullary lengthening.

Secondary limb lengthening after intercalary bone resection in pediatric patients is still challenging. After the resection, a free fibula autograft can be used to reconstruct the osseous gap. However, in particular in young pediatric patients, insufficient growth of the epiphyseal plate after transplantation may lead to a significant limb-length discrepancy (LLD). In this case, the autograft was used for limb lengthening. We report on the lengthening of a humerus regenerate after fibula autograft transplantation into a humeral defect in a pediatric/young adolescent patient. Because of LLD, she underwent callus distraction of the humerus regenerate after transplantation of a fibula autograft using a unilateral external fixator device. An 18-year-old female patient with status postintercalary proliferating chondroma resection (at the age of 7 years) required treatment for correction of a 13 cm humerus shortening. She reported no pain, had no functional limitations, and had a full range of motion of the shoulder and elbow joint. She complained about her short humerus and overall body scheme. A unilateral external fixator device for callus distraction was applied to the transplanted humerus regenerate after free fibula autograft transplantation. Bone lengthening was performed by distraction (2×0.5 mm/day). After 62 days and a lengthening of 6 cm in total, bone distraction was stopped mainly to avoid any complication. At this time, there was no limitation in the range of motion. No nerve palsy or other problems occurred at any time of the distraction. In pediatric patients, the transplantation of a fibula autograft is a well-established option to bridge an osseous gap after intercalary bone resection. This case report shows that even the humerus regenerate after fibula autograft transplantation has excellent potential for callotasis and bone remodeling and therefore bone lengthening in patients with LLD is an option even after transplantation of an autograft. This method provides a new therapeutic option for patients with LLD after fibula transplantation.