Search

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: Little is known about structural and mechanical properties of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes and even less about the influence of antithrombotic drugs on L-PRF. The aim of this in vitro study is therefore to investigate mechanical properties, fibrin structure and cell content of L-PRF membranes and the impact of anticoagulant therapy on L-PRF. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 12 volunteers and supplemented with either no, 1.25 IU, 2.5 IU, 5 IU, or 10 IU enoxaparin. L-PRF membranes were characterized with tensile testing, scanning electron microscopy, and measurement of platelets and leukocytes. Control and enoxaparin-supplemented L-PRF membranes were compared. RESULTS: At 10 IU enoxaparin, no L-PRF membranes could be generated, whereas the low doses of 1.25 and 2.5 IU had no influence on L-PRF properties. The mechanical properties, fibrin networks, and number of platelets and leukocytes of 5 IU supplemented membranes were unlike the control membranes, but were not found to be significantly different because of limited sampling and inter- and intra-variability. CONCLUSION: Low doses of the anticoagulant enoxaparin do not affect mechanical properties, fibrin network, nor cellular content of L-PRF, whereas high doses impair L-PRF generation. ispartof: JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH vol:55 issue:5 pages:686-693 ispartof: location:United States status: published

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the use of the leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes in increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa (KM) around implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients in need for bilateral widening of the KM around implants in the lower jaw were recruited for a spit-mouth randomized controlled trial. At the control site, a free gingival graft (FGG) was used, whereas at the other side (test), L-PRF membranes were applied. The primary outcome was the increase in width of KM around the implants. As secondary outcomes, the postoperative pain and surgical time were assessed. The follow-up period was 6 weeks. RESULTS: A significant increase in the total bucco-lingual width of KM in both groups was observed, with 1.3 mm ± 0.9 extra gain (P