Search

The biopharmaceutics risk assessment roadmap (BioRAM) optimizes drug product development and performance by using therapy-driven target drug delivery profiles as a framework to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome. Hence, clinical relevance is directly built into early formulation development. Biopharmaceutics tools are used to identify and address potential challenges to optimize the drug product for patient benefit. For illustration, BioRAM is applied to four relatively common therapy-driven drug delivery scenarios: rapid therapeutic onset, multiphasic delivery, delayed therapeutic onset, and maintenance of target exposure. BioRAM considers the therapeutic target with the drug substance characteristics and enables collection of critical knowledge for development of a dosage form that can perform consistently for meeting the patient's needs. Accordingly, the key factors are identified and in vitro, in vivo, and in silico modeling and simulation techniques are used to elucidate the optimal drug delivery rate and pattern. BioRAM enables (1) feasibility assessment for the dosage form, (2) development and conduct of appropriate "learning and confirming" studies, (3) transparency in decision-making, (4) assurance of drug product quality during lifecycle management, and (5) development of robust linkages between the desired clinical outcome and the necessary product quality attributes for inclusion in the quality target product profile.

One of the most prominent food-drug interactions is the inhibition of intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes by grapefruit juice ingredients, and, as many drugs are metabolized via CYP 3A, this interaction can be of clinical importance. Calcium channel-blocking agents of the dihydropyridine type, such as felodipine and nifedipine, are subject to extensive intestinal first pass metabolism via CYP 3A, thus resulting in significantly enhanced in vivo exposure of the drug when administered together with grapefruit juice. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used to simulate pharmacokinetics of a nifedipine immediate release formulation following concomitant grapefruit juice ingestion, that is, after inhibition of small intestinal CYP 3A enzymes. For this purpose, detailed data about CYP 3A levels were collected from the literature and implemented into commercial PBPK software. As literature reports show that grapefruit juice (i) leads to a marked delay in gastric emptying, and (ii) rapidly lowers the levels of intestinal CYP 3A enzymes, inhibition of intestinal first pass metabolism following ingestion of grapefruit juice was simulated by altering the intestinal CYP 3A enzyme levels and simultaneously decelerating the gastric emptying rate. To estimate the in vivo dispersion and dissolution behavior of the formulation, dissolution tests in several media simulating both the fasted and fed state stomach and small intestine were conducted, and the results from the in vitro dissolution tests were used as input function to describe the in vivo dissolution of the drug. Plasma concentration-time profiles of the nifedipine immediate release formulation both with and without simultaneous CYP 3A inhibition were simulated, and the results were compared with data gathered from the literature. Using this approach, nifedipine plasma profiles could be simulated well both with and without enzyme inhibition. A reduction in small intestinal CYP 3A levels by 60% was found to yield the best results, with simulated nifedipine concentration-time profiles within 20% of the in vivo observed results. By additionally varying the dissolution input of the PBPK model, a link between the dissolution characteristics of the formulation and its in vivo performance could be established.

The bioavailability of hydrochlorothiazide was determined following single oral 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-mg tablet and suspension doses in 12 healthy male volunteers. Plasma and urine levels of hydrochlorothiazide were determined by HPLC. Plasma levels of hydrochlorothiazide were satisfactorily described by a triexponential function. Mean peak plasma levels, Cmax (127-135, 270-280, and 437-490 ng/mL from the 25-, 50-, and 100-mg doses, respectively) were dose proportional, as were areas under plasma profiles, AUC0----36. Mean percentage recovery of unchanged hydrochlorothiazide in 48-h urine samples accounted for 50-59, 54-55, 60-63, and 54-57% of the 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-mg doses, respectively. There were no significant differences among these values. Correlation coefficients between 48-h urinary recovery of hydrochlorothiazide and the plasma values (Cmax and AUC0----36) for the 25-, 50-, and 100-mg doses were 0.73 and 0.84. There were no differences in the net increases in electrolyte excretion among the treatments during the 0-12-h postdose period. The systematic availability of hydrochlorothiazide, unlike that of chlorothiazide, is dose proportional in the therapeutic range.

The pharmacokinetics of probenecid were examined following single 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-g oral doses to healthy male volunteers. Doses were administered following overnight fast, according to a randomized design. Plasma levels of probenecid were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), using sulfamethazine as the internal standard. Mean peak probenecid levels of 35.3, 69.6, and 148.6 micrograms/ml were obtained at 3-4 hr following the 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-g doses, respectively. Probenecid levels from the 0.5- and 1.0-g doses declined in apparent monoexponential fashion, with mean elimination half-lives of 4.2 and 4.9 hr. Interpretation of the 2.0-g data by a kinetic model incorporating first-order elimination resulted in a plasma drug half-life of 8.5 hr. When first-order elimination was replaced by a Michaelis-Menten-type function, the mean value of the resulting Vm/Km ratios was 0.20, equivalent to a plasma drug half-life [0.693/(Vm/Km)] of 3.8 hr. Plasma probenecid curves from all three dosages were successfully fitted to the saturable elimination model using nonlinear regression and numerical integration routines. The results suggest that probenecid elimination may be saturable at therapeutic dose levels.

The relative bioavailability of hydrocortisone was determined from four different 20-mg tablet formulations and one suspension in 15 healthy male volunteers; results were compared with in vitro dissolution rates. Plasma levels of hydrocortisone were determined by a liquid chromatography method developed in this laboratory. Dissolution of the tablet formulations, using the official USP test, varied from 7.8 to 93.8% in 30 min. Similar plasma profiles were obtained from all tablet products, and there were no differences among tablets in the cumulative percentage of drug absorbed. There were no clear trends in any pharmacokinetic parameter values among the tablet dosages, and the four products were considered bioequivalent. The suspension dosage yielded significantly higher plasma levels compared with some of the tablet formulations during the initial 30-min postdose, significantly higher cumulative absorption at 0.5 and 1.0 h compared with one tablet formulation, and significantly higher ka and Cmax, and shorter tmax values, compared with some of the tablets.