Search

Structure and function of the cerebrovasculature is critical for ischemic stroke outcome. We showed that diabetes causes cerebrovascular remodeling by activation of the endothelin A (ET(A)) receptors. The goal of this study was to test the hypotheses that vasculoprotective endothelial ET(B) receptors are decreased and pharmacological inhibition of the ET(B) receptor augments vascular remodeling of middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) in type 2 diabetes. MCA structure, matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity, and matrix proteins as well as ET(A) and ET(B) receptor profiles were assessed in control Wistar and diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats treated with vehicle, the ET(B) receptor antagonist (2R,3R,4S)-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-[2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)amino]-2-oxoethyl]-2-(4-propoxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylic acid (A192621) (30 mg/kg/day), or the dual ET receptor antagonist bosentan (100 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks. Diabetes increased vascular smooth muscle (VSM) ET(A) and ET(B) receptors; the increase was prevented by chronic bosentan treatment. MCA wall thickness was increased in diabetes, and this was associated with increased MMP-2 activity and collagen deposition but reduced MMP-13 activity. Because of up-regulation of VSM ET receptors in diabetes, selective ET(B) receptor antagonism with A192621 blunts this response, and combined ET(A) and ET(B) receptor blockade with bosentan completely prevents this response. On the other hand, A192621 treatment augmented remodeling in control animals, indicating a physiological protective role for this receptor subtype. Attenuation of changes in ET receptor profile with bosentan treatment suggests that ET-1 has a positive feedback on the expression of its receptors in the cerebrovasculature. These results emphasize that ET receptor antagonism may yield different results in healthy and diseased states.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the involvement of endothelin (ET)(B) receptor-mediated action in the sex differences in balloon injury-induced neointimal formation using the spotting-lethal rat, which carries a naturally occurring deletion in its ET(B) receptor gene. Male and female ET(B)-deficient and wild-type rats underwent balloon injury of the carotid artery. In the wild-type rats, the neointima/media ratio was significantly lower in females than in males, but this sex difference was attenuated by ovariectomy and restored by treatment with 17β-estradiol (20 μg/kg/day). In the ET(B)-deficient rats, the neointima/media ratio of the male and female rats was markedly increased to the same level, and this increase was not affected by ovariectomy or 17β-estradiol treatment. Treatment with (+)-(5S,6R,7R)-2-butyl-7-[2-((2S)-2-carboxypropyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]-5-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)cyclopenteno[1,2-b]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid (J-104132) (10 mg/kg/day), an ET(A)/ET(B) dual receptor antagonist, markedly decreased the neointima/media ratio of the male wild-type rats and the male and female ET(B)-deficient rats, but not the female wild-type rats. In addition, 2R-(4-propoxyphenyl)-4S-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-(N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)aminocarbonyl-methyl)-pyrrolidine-3R-carboxylic acid (A-192621) (30 mg/kg/day), a selective ET(B) receptor antagonist, abolished the sex difference of balloon injury-induced neointimal formation. 2R-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4S-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-(N,N-di(n-butyl)aminocarbonyl-methyl)-pyrrolidine-3R-carboxylic acid (ABT-627) (10 mg/kg/day), a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, and J-104132 (10 mg/kg/day) markedly decreased the neointima/media ratio to the same extent in males but not intact females. These results indicate that the sex difference in balloon injury-induced neointimal formation was abolished by genetic ET(B) receptor deficiency or its pharmacological blockade. The lack of a vasoprotective effect of estrogen and the augmentation of ET(A) receptor-mediated action seem to be responsible for the abolition of sex differences in the ET(B) receptor-inhibited condition.

We tested the hypothesis that endothelin-1 (ET-1) modulates sensory-motor nervous arterial relaxation by prejunctional and postjunctional mechanisms. Isolated rat mesenteric resistance arteries were investigated with immunohistochemistry, wire-myography, and pharmacological tools. ET(A)- and ET(B)-receptors could be visualized on the endothelium and smooth muscle and on periarterial fibers containing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Arterial contractile responses to ET-1 (0.25-16 nM) were not modified by blockade of ET(B)-receptors, NO-synthase, and cyclooxygenase or desensitization of transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (TRPV1) with capsaicin. ET-1 reversed relaxing responses to CGRP in depolarized arteries. This effect was inhibited by ET(A)-antagonists. It was not selective because ET-1 also reversed relaxing responses to Na-nitroprusside (SNP) and because phenylephrine (PHE; 0.25-16 microM) similarly reversed relaxing responses to CGRP or SNP. Conversely, contractile responses to ET-1 were, compared with PHE, hypersensitive to the relaxing effects of the TRPV1-agonist capsaicin and to exogenous CGRP, but not to acetylcholine, forskolin, pinacidil, or SNP. In conclusion, ET-1 does not stimulate sensory-motor nervous arterial relaxation, but ET(A)-mediated arterial contractions are selectively sensitive to relaxation by the sensory neurotransmitter CGRP. This does not involve NO, cAMP, or ATP-sensitive K(+) channels.

Endothelin receptors (ET(A) and ET(B)) mediate responses to ET-1. ET(B) receptor function seems to differ between a similarly sized arterial and venous pair, the rat vena cava (RVC) and rat thoracic aorta (RA). ET(B) receptors mediate RVC contraction directly, but it is unclear whether ET(B) receptors mediate contraction in RA. Because of these apparent differences in ET(B) receptor-mediated vascular contraction, we hypothesize that relaxant ET(B)-receptor mechanisms in RVC would be different from those in RA. RA and RVC rings were isolated from rats for measurement of isometric contraction. When contracted with prostaglandin F-2alpha (PGF-2alpha) (20 microM), the ET(B) receptor agonist sarafotoxin-6c (S6c) (100 nM) significantly relaxed RA and RVC. N(omega)-Nitro-L-arginine (LNNA) (100 microM) or endothelial denudation abolished relaxation to S6c in RA. By contrast, S6c-induced relaxation of RVC was attenuated but not abolished by LNNA and endothelial denudation. RVC (PGF-2alpha-contracted) relaxed to low concentrations of ET-1, whereas under the same conditions RA responded with contraction. ET-1-induced relaxation in RA was observed only with ET(A) receptor blockade. Vessels from dopamine-beta-hydroxylase-ET(B) transgenic rats, which lack functional ET(B) receptors in the vasculature, were also used. RVC (PGF-2alpha-contracted) from these rats did not relax to ET-1. Thus, although both RA and RVC possess endothelial relaxant ET(B) receptors, RA and RVC differ in that relaxant ET(B) receptors may also be present in smooth muscle of RVC. Moreover, the mechanisms of endothelial cell ET(B) receptor-mediated relaxation in RA and RVC are not the same.

During sympathetic neurotransmitter release, there is evidence for differential modulation of cotransmitter release by endothelin (ET)-1. Using nerve growth factor (NGF)-differentiated PC12 cells, the effects of ET-1 on K(+)-stimulated release of ATP, dopamine (DA), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) were quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography or radioimmunoassay. ET-1, in a concentration-dependent manner, inhibited the release of ATP, but not DA and NPY. Preincubation with the ET(A/B) antagonist, PD 142893 (N-acetyl-beta-phenyl-D-Phe-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp), reversed the inhibitory effect of ET-1 on ATP release, which remained unaffected in the presence of the ET(A)-specific antagonist BQ123 [cyclo(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp)]. The ET(B) agonists, sarafotoxin 6c (Cys-Thr-Cys-Asn-Asp-Met-Thr-Asp-Glu-Glu-Cys-Leu-Asn-Phe-Cys-His-Gln-Asp-Val-Ile-Trp), BQ 3020 (N-acetyl-[Ala(11,15)]-endothelin 1 fragment 6-21Ac-Leu-Met-Asp-Lys-Glu-Ala-Val-Tyr-Phe-Ala-His-Leu-Asp-IIe-IIe-Trp), and IRL 1620 (N-succinyl-[Glu(9), Ala(11,15)]-endothelin 1 fragment 8-21Suc-Asp-Glu-Glu-Ala-Val-Tyr-Phe-Ala-His-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp), decreased K(+)-stimulated release of ATP in a dose-dependent manner, and this effect was reversed by the ET(B) antagonists RES 701-1 [cyclic (Gly1-Asp9) (Gly-Asn-Trp-His-Gly-Thr-Ala-Pro-Asp-Trp-Phe-Phe-Asn-Tyr-Tyr-Trp)] and BQ 788 (N-[N-[N-[(2,6-dimethyl-1-piperidinyl)carbonyl]-4-methyl-l-leucyl]-1-(methoxycarbonyl)-D-tryptophyl]-D-norleucine sodium salt). Preincubation of PC12 cells with pertussis toxin reversed the ET-1-induced inhibition of the K(+)-evoked ATP release. Real-time intracellular calcium level recordings were performed on PC-12 cell suspensions, and ET-1 induced a dose-dependent decrease in the K(+)-evoked calcium levels. Nifedipine, the L-type voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel antagonist, caused inhibition of the K(+)-stimulated ATP release, but the N-type Ca(2+) channel antagonist, omega-conotoxin GVIA, did not reverse the effect on ATP release. These data suggest that ET-1 modulates the release of ATP via the ET(B) receptor and its associated G(i/o) G-protein through attenuation of the influx of extracellular Ca(2+) through L-type channels.

Interleukin (IL)-18 has an important role in the pathogenesis of arthritis, which is accompanied by movement limitation secondary to inflammatory articular nociception. Therefore, we investigated the possible mechanical hypernociceptive effect of IL-18 in rats using the paw constant pressure and the electronic pressure-meter tests. In both tests, intraplantar administration of IL-18 (20-60 ng paw(-1)) caused a dose- and time-dependent mechanical hypernociception, which peaked 3 h and reached control levels 24 h after injection. Pretreatments with indomethacin (2.5 mg kg(-1)), atenolol (1 mg kg(-1)), or 3-[1-(p-chlorobenzyl)-5-(isopropyl)-3-t-butylthioindol-2-yl]-2;2-dimethylpropanoic acid; Na (MK886) (5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor; 1 mg kg(-1)) did not inhibit IL-18-evoked hypernociception (40 ng paw(-1)), whereas dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)) inhibited the process. IL-18-evoked hypernociception was not inhibited by pretreatment with antiserum to rat tumor necrosis factor-alpha (50 microl paw(-1)) or IL-1 receptor antagonist (300 pg paw(-1)). Pretreatment with N-cys-2,6 dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-l-gamma-methylleucyl-d-1-methoxycarboyl-d-norleucine (BQ788) (ET(B) receptor antagonist; 3-30 nmol paw(-1)), but not with cyclo[(D)Trp-(D)Asp-Pro-(D)Val-Leu] (BQ123) (ET(A) receptor antagonist; 30 nmol paw(-1)), dose dependently inhibited the IL-18-induced hypernociception. Pretreatment with morphine (3-12 microg paw(-1)) also dose-dependently inhibited the IL-18-induced hypernociception. Moreover, endothelin-1-induced mechanical hypernociception also was inhibited by BQ788, but not by BQ123, indomethacin, or atenolol. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that IL-18 is a prohypernociceptive cytokine that induces mechanical hypernociception mediated by endothelin, via ET(B) receptor. Therefore, inhibition of the endothelin ET(B) receptor could be beneficial on controlling inflammatory hypernociception of diseases in which IL-18 plays a role in their pathogenesis.