1. Venous anatomy of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: A cadaveric and clinical study.
- Author
-
Sun JM, Yamamoto T, and Goh TL
- Subjects
- Humans, Iliac Artery surgery, Iliac Artery anatomy & histology, Lower Extremity, Cadaver, Perforator Flap blood supply, Hyperemia
- Abstract
Background: Reconstructive surgeons frequently face challenges with free tissue transfer when transplanted flaps are thicker than intended. This is especially pronounced in lower limb cases, where the soft tissue below the knee is thin. The supra-fascial superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) flap overcomes this problem, but venous congestion remains a concern. We aim to examine the venous anatomy of the SCIP flap through cadaveric dissections and clinical data analyses to enhance the understanding of the venous anatomy and reduce venous congestion in future procedures., Methods: Eight cadaveric groins underwent venous dye injection and dissection to identify the superficial circumflex iliac vein (SCIV) and venae comitantes (VC) vascular networks. The venous anatomy was studied for dominant drainage. From April 2015 to December 2019, we conducted 102 SCIP flap reconstructions, mainly using the superficial circumflex iliac artery's superficial branch. Clinical data were analyzed and correlated with cadaveric dissections. SCIP flaps were categorized into three groups: dual drainage (VC and SCIV) in group I, SCIV-only in group II, and VC-only in group III., Results: Correlations between clinical cases and cadaveric dissections revealed the SCIV as an independent drainage system with oscillating links to the VC. The SCIV is approximately twice the diameter of the VC, and the area of each vascular network suggests codominance. No significant difference in flap loss or venous congestion rates was noted when SCIV was the sole drainage, compared with VC or dual drainage., Conclusion: The SCIP flap with one artery and SCIV anastomosis, exhibits low venous congestion rates. Surgeons should consider SCIV for safe SCIP flap reconstruction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF