Search

Background: Variability in breast reconstruction methods provides an opportunity to investigate whether a method is superior to another with regard to cost, quality, or both. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) study based on tertiary endpoint data from a randomized clinical trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of delayed breast reconstruction by either a latissimus dorsi flap (LD) or a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap (TAP)., Material & Methods: A total of 50 women were included for unilateral delayed breast reconstruction and were randomized to reconstruction by either the LD flap (n = 18) or the TAP flap (n = 22). The CEA was based on differences in shoulder function after the reconstruction. Direct and indirect costs relating to the two procedures were assessed by the Danish Diagnosis-Related Groups tariffs., Results: Our analysis showed a significant positive effect of introducing the TAP flap on the total shoulder score with an additional cost of $2779. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $4481 and based on a willingness to pay (WTP) $500, we found an estimated net benefit of $519, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0375). The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicated that there is a 96.3% probability for the TAP flap being cost-effective to the LD flap at a WTP threshold of $500., Conclusion: From a societal perspective, our cost-effective analysis demonstrated that the TAP flap is the more cost-effective method of breast reconstruction compared to the LD flap with respect to patient-reported shoulder-related disability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This paper presents the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that focus on health-related quality-of-life (QoL) and patient-reported satisfaction following breast reconstruction with pedicled flaps from the back., Materials & Methods: We included women for unilateral delayed breast reconstruction. Patients were randomized to reconstruction by either a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap or a thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap. Assessment of QoL and patient satisfaction was made using two different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): The EORTC QLQ-30 and the Breast-Q questionnaire for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction., Results: A total of 50 women were enrolled over a two-year period and allocated to reconstruction. Forty patients completed both surgery and follow-up and were included in the analysis - 18 in the LD group and 22 in the TAP group. The EORTC QLQ-30 was administered at the baseline and at one-year follow-up. There was no significant effect of introducing the TAP flap on either the summary score, the global QoL-score or the financial impact-score when compared to the LD flap. The Breast-Q questionnaire was administered only at one-year follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the scores for satisfaction with the reconstructed breast, the overall outcome and QoL related to psycho-social, sexual and physical well-being., Conclusion: Women from both groups report high satisfaction and QoL following the reconstruction. The quality of the dataset and the study design are, however, insufficient to rule out any existing difference. A larger cohort, longer follow-up and different design are warranted to assess the true clinical significance these reconstructions might have on satisfaction and QoL., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The first author has received a donation of ADM (Strattice(Ⓡ)) from Acelity™ to be used in the randomized clinical trial. Apart from this none of the authors have any disclosures in terms of financial and/or personal relationships with people or organizations that could influence this published work. This study did not receive any funding., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a relatively common side effect after an outbreak of herpes zoster (HZ), characterized by chronic neuropathic dermal pain. No effective treatment exists today. Fat grafting has shown promise in alleviating neuropathic pain, yet the exact mechanism of action, at a biological level, is not yet known. We report on the first human study using autologous fat grafting for treating PHN. Our hypothesis was that fat grafting can alleviate pain and improve the quality of life (QoL) in patients suffering from PHN. If successful, this could be a safe, cost-effective alternative to analgesics. This safety and feasibility study aimed to investigate the possible pain-relieving effect of autologous fat grafting on PHN., Methods: Ten adult patients suffering from PHN underwent autologous fat grafting to a dermal area of neuralgia, with a 12-week follow up. The primary endpoint was patient-reported pain. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported changes in QoL, and the degree and quality of the neuropathic pain., Results: The pain was measured by using a visual analog scale (range: 0-10). We observed improvements in both the average and maximum level of pain with a reduction of (-4.0 ± 3.1) and (-5.1 ± 3.9), respectively, (Δ mean ± SD), P<0.05. All parameters investigating neuropathic pain were significantly reduced. No improvement was seen in the QoL. The average amount of fat grafted was 208 ml. We observed no serious adverse effects., Conclusion: This study suggests that autologous fat grafting can relieve chronic pain resulting from HZ. The next step toward routine clinical translation is to perform a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial with a more extended follow-up period., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigates differences in shoulder-related morbidity after delayed breast reconstruction by either a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap or a thoracodorsal artery perforater (TAP) flap., Material and Methods: In accordance with the CONSORT guidelines, we included women for unilateral delayed breast reconstruction. Patients were randomized to reconstruction by either of the two flaps. Shoulder-function was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The primary endpoint was patient-reported shoulder-related pain. A further objective assessment by the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) was included as secondary endpoints., Results: A total of 50 women were enrolled over a two-year period and allocated to reconstruction, with 25 patients in each group. Patient-reported shoulder-related pain was significantly lower in the TAP group at 12 months after surgery when adjusting for pain at baseline: OR = 0.05 95%CI(0.005-0.51), p-value = 0.011. The estimated effect on the total CSS at 12 months, when applying the TAP flap instead of the LD flap and adjusting for the baseline score, was 6.2 points with 95%CI(0.5-12.0), p-value 0.033. The TAP flap seems to have a statistically significant positive effect on pain and activity in daily life (ADL), while there were no significant effect on range of motion and strength after one year., Conclusion: Patient reconstructed by the TAP flap are less likely to experience shoulder-related pain and have a better shoulder-function one year after the reconstruction. Harvest of the LD flap carries a higher risk of shoulder-function impairment, chronic pain and reduced ADL., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) for melanoma is associated with a number of complications including seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), and lymphedema. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has shown promising results in preventing postoperative morbidity across a wide variety of surgical procedures, but these results are yet to be investigated in patients undergoing ILND for melanoma., Methods: In this study, we reviewed the data of 55 melanoma patients treated with ILND between January 2015 and January 2017 at Odense University Hospital. Patients were followed up until April 2018 for the occurrence of seroma, SSI, and lymphedema. We used prophylactic iNPWT after ILND in 14 patients and compared their morbidity outcomes with the 41 patients receiving standard postoperative wound care in the same period., Results: The iNPWT intervention significantly reduced seroma compared to the control group (28.6% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001) and had a trending impact on wound infection (42.9% vs. 65.9%, p = 0.13). The effect was not significant for the prevention of lymphedema (35.7% vs. 51.2%, p = 0.33). Because the iNPWT group had relatively fewer incidences of seroma, SSI, and lymphedema, the iNPWT intervention was more cost-effective than conventional wound care (US$911.2 vs. US$2542.7, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The use of prophylactic iNPWT significantly reduced seroma formation following ILND. These promising results, however, need to be confirmed in a future prospective randomized trial., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We report a study evaluating and comparing shoulder-related morbidity associated with delayed breast reconstruction using either the conventional latissimus dorsi (LD) flap or the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap., Material & Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women over 18 years of age who had a unilateral, delayed breast reconstruction by either an LD or TAP flap at one center over a 56-month period. Shoulder function was assessed using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), which evaluated pain, activity of daily life (ADL), range of motion (ROM), and strength. A number of secondary outcomes were also examined., Results: Forty-nine women were included. Demographic and breast treatment data were comparable between the groups. The mean total CSS score for the reconstructed side of the TAP flap was statistically significantly better than that of the LD flap, with a difference of 10.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-19.2, p-value 0.01). The mean total CSS score for the nonreconstructed side was not statistically significant between groups, with a difference of 0.1 points (95% CI = -6.1-6.2, p-value 0.98). The subscore analysis revealed that women reconstructed using the TAP flap had a difference of 3.2 points for pain (p-value 0.003) and 5.5 points for ROM (p-value 0.011). The factors ADL and strength were of equal magnitude in both groups., Conclusions: Patients who undergo delayed breast reconstruction by the TAP flap seem less prone to suffer from postoperative pain and restricted ROM, thereby suggesting that this flap should be considered an advantageous alternative to the conventional LD flap. A randomized clinical trial is warranted to provide sufficient evidence to this statement., (Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Cancer-related lymphedema is a common complication following lymph node excision. Prevention of lymphedema is essential, as treatment options are limited. Known risk factors are firmly anchored to the cancer treatment itself; however potentially preventable factors such as seroma and surgical-site infection (SSI) have yet to be asserted., Methods: All malignant melanoma patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) and/or complete lymph node dissection (CLND) in the axilla or groin between January 2008 and December 2014 were retrospectively identified. Identified patients were followed until March 2017 for the incidence of lymphedema., Results: We identified 70 cases of extremity lymphedema following 640 SNB/CLND. SSI was an independent risk factor for developing lymphedema (HR 8.46, 95%CI 4.37-16.36, p < 0.001), whilst seroma was an independent risk factor for developing SSI (OR 6.92, 95%CI 4.11-12.54, p < 0.001). In addition, the risk of lymphedema was significantly larger following inguinal incisions compared to axillary incisions (HR 2.49, 95%CI 1.36-4.55, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: SSI was the greatest independent risk factor for developing lymphedema. Additionally, patients' that developed postoperative seroma were at an increased risk of also developing SSI. Future studies should examine if lymphedema can be prevented, by reducing seroma and SSI., (Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is considered one of the working horses within the field of breast reconstruction and it offers several advantages. However, donor-site morbidity may pose a problem. This article describes a new and modified technique for delayed breast reconstruction combining the use of a propeller thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and an implant., Methods: The paper presents 43 delayed breast reconstructions in 38 women using a modified technique for harvesting the TAP flap in combination with an ADM and an implant for total breast reconstruction. The focus of this paper is the refinements of our technique and short-term outcome in complication rates. The data presented were collected retrospectively., Results: Three patients experienced major complications including hematoma, partial flap necrosis, and venous congestion. In addition, seven patients experienced minor complications including small partial flap necrosis and epidermolysis. There were no cases of infection and all flaps survived. The reconstructive goal was achieved in a single-stage procedure in all but one, 42/43 cases (98%)., Conclusions: The propeller TAP flap combined with an ADM and an implant can safely be used for delayed breast reconstruction. The technique offers a single-stage reconstruction and the donor-site morbidity is limited. The method is safe and reliable with complication rates comparable to those of similar methods. Although there is a learning curve, this simple modified technique does not demand any perforator or other vessel dissection. Any trained plastic surgeon should be able to adopt the technique into the growing armamentarium of breast reconstruction possibilities., (Copyright © 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)