Search

Introduction: The Extension of Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) is a global movement that aims to decentralize the knowledge of specialists to primary care. A pilot, ECHO palliative care project in Thailand, was introduced to enhance the implementation of palliative care practice. Objective: To assess learners’ and palliative care specialists’ perceptions toward the ECHO palliative care project to improve and expand the project in the future. Setting: A total of 15 hospitals in 7 provinces in Northern Thailand, including provincial and district hospitals. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among learners (primary care providers) and palliative care specialists who participated in the pilot program. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the potential impact of the project on clinical practice, the strengths and weaknesses of the ECHO program and platform in the Thai context, and suggestions for expansion. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. Pre- and post-confidence scores, using a 5-point Likert Scale, for palliative care practice among learners were analyzed using paired T -tests. Results: Twenty participants were interviewed: 15 learners and 5 palliative care specialists. The confidence in practicing palliative care after participating in the ECHO palliative care project significantly increased for the learners, from 2.93 (95% CI, 2.49-3.38) to 3.93 (95% CI, 3.68-4.19) points ( P = .003). Three themes emerged through the process evaluation of the pilot ECHO palliative care project: (1) applicable lessons that can translate to practice, (2) an effective learning program and assessable platform, and (3) suggestions for expansion. Conclusion: The ECHO palliative care project increased confidence in providing palliative care for primary care providers in Thailand. Through capacity building, participants reported applying the knowledge to improve local health services and develop a network for consultations and referrals. There is potential for expansion of the ECHO palliative care project in Thailand.

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have reduced gait speeds and more frequent falls. We analyzed gait characteristics and fall risk in these patients using video recordings and questionnaires to determine if these patients had any quantitative changes in gait characteristics and to determine if screening for fall risk provided useful information. Methods: Patients with COPD who had participated in pulmonary rehabilitation completed a short history falls and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale questionnaire. They performed the Get Up and Go Test. Their typical gait was video recorded and analyzed with Dartfish software. Results: Fourteen patients completed this study. The mean age was 69.7 ± 6.0 years, and the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 1.01 ± 0.38 L (36.9% ± 15.6% predicted). Three patients had a history of falls without significant injury. The mean Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale score was 91.8 ± 14.9, but the scores ranged from 10 to 100. Patients reported decreased balance confidence when “stepping onto or off an escalator while holding onto parcels.” The mean time in the Get Up and Go Test was 11.9 ± 2.0 seconds. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait included mean step length 0.65 ± 0.6 m, mean double support time 0.36 ± 0.05 seconds, mean double support time ratio 30.4% ± 3.1%, average free walking speed 65.3 ± 6.9 m/min, and number of steps per minute 100.4 ± 8.8. The speed was significantly slower and the double support time was significantly longer when compared with normal values. Conclusions: Most patients had good balance confidence scores. Their gait and balance were qualitatively normal using the Tinetti tools for assessment. Therefore, their risk for falls seems low. They had a reduced step length and increased time spent in double support, changes which might represent subtle adaptations to reduced balance.