1. How do illness-anxious individuals process health-threatening information? A systematic review of evidence for the cognitive-behavioral model
- Author
-
Leonidou, Chrysanthi, Panayiotou, Georgia, Panayiotou, Georgia [0000-0003-2471-9960], and Leonidou, Chrysanthi [0000-0001-7712-9644]
- Subjects
Male ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,050103 clinical psychology ,Process (engineering) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Emotions ,Behavioral avoidance ,Anxiety ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Perception ,Negativity bias ,medicine ,Humans ,Attention ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Quality (business) ,Illness Behavior ,media_common ,05 social sciences ,Awareness ,030227 psychiatry ,Behavioral modeling ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Psychology ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
According to the cognitive-behavioral model, illness anxiety is developed and maintained through biased processing of health-threatening information and maladaptive responses to such information. Objective This study is a systematic review of research that attempted to validate central tenets of the cognitive-behavioral model regarding etiological and maintenance mechanisms in illness anxiety. Methods Sixty-two studies, including correlational and experimental designs, were identified through a systematic search of databases and were evaluated for their quality. Results Outcomes were synthesized following a qualitative thematic approach under categories of theoretically driven mechanisms derived from the cognitive-behavioral model: attention, memory and interpretation biases, perceived awareness and inaccuracy in perception of somatic sensations, negativity bias, emotion dysregulation, and behavioral avoidance. Conclusions Findings partly support the cognitive-behavioral model, but several of its hypothetical mechanisms only receive weak support due to the scarcity of relevant studies. Directions for future research are suggested based on identified gaps in the existing literature.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF