Search

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of pedal cadence upon torque production, power output and muscle fatigue rates during functional electrical stimulation evoked cycling in spinal cord injured individuals. SUBJECTS: All subjects had complete thoracic spinal cord injuries T4-T9 (ASIA A) and had been functional electrical stimulation training regularly for at least 6 months. METHODS: One trial (n = 8) examined a low vs high pedal rate (20 and 50 rev x min(-1)) upon isolated muscle fatigue over 5 minutes. A second trial (n = 9) investigated the effect of cadence (15 vs 50 rev x min(-1)) upon performance during 35-minutes of functional electrical stimulation evoked cycling. RESULTS: Peak torque produced by left quadriceps decayed significantly faster at the higher pedal cadence, indicating a higher rate of muscle fatigue. Functional electrical stimulation cycling over 35 minutes also revealed that peak and average torques were significantly greater at the lower cadence. From 15 minutes onwards, power output was significantly higher at 50 rev x min(-1) FES-cycling, compared with 15 rev x min(-1). CONCLUSION: The higher muscle forces observed during low cadence functional electrical stimulation cycling should offer improvements over traditional pedalling velocities for training leg strength in individuals with spinal cord injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analysed external power output and physiologic responses in 5 individuals with paraplegia during 40 minutes of electrical stimulation leg cycle exercise. Cycling was performed on a motor-driven isokinetic ergometer that enabled precise determinations of power output. Electrical stimulation was increased to 120-140 mA within the first 5 minutes and remained constant thereafter. Power output increased to 10.7 +/- 3.0 W after 2 minutes, dropped to 5.3 +/- 1.8 W after 6 minutes and subsequently recovered to 8.2 +/- 2.2 and 6.1 +/- 2.3 W after 19.5 and 40 minutes, respectively. Oxygen consumption increased to 0.47 +/- 0.09 l/min after 6 minutes and declined during the second half of the exercise bout. Gross mechanical efficiency after 19.5 minutes was elevated compared with the value after 6 minutes. Heart rate was significantly increased at the end of the trial. The time-dependent variability of power output and physiological responses question the concept of steady state for this form of exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]