Search

An automated, environmentally friendly, simple, selective, and sensitive method was developed for the determination of ten primary aliphatic amines in sewage sludge at μg/kg dry weight (d.w.). The procedure involves a pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) of the analytes from the solid matrix, followed by a fully automated on‐fiber derivatization with 2,3,4,5‐pentafluorobenzaldehyde (PFBAY) and headspace solid‐phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) and subsequent gas chromatography ion‐trap tandem mass spectrometry (GC‐IT‐MS‐MS) analysis. The limits of detection (LODs) of the method were between 0.5 and 45 μg/kg (d.w.) for all compounds except for ethyl‐, isopropyl‐, and amylamine, whose LODs were 70, 109, and 116 μg/kg (d.w.), respectively. The limits of quantification (LOQs) were between 10 and 350 μg/kg (d.w.). Repeatability and intermediate precision, expressed as RSD(%) (n=3), were lower than 18 and 21%, respectively. The method developed enabled to determine primary aliphatic amines in sludge from various urban and industrial sewage treatment plants as well as from a potable treatment plant. Most of the primary aliphatic amines were found in the sewage sludge samples analyzed corresponding to the maximum concentrations to the samples from the urban plant: for instance, isobutylamine and methylamine were found at 7728 and 12 536 μg/kg (d.w.), respectively. Amylamine was detected only in few samples but always at concentrations lower than its LOQ.

A solid‐phase extraction and liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (SPE/LC‐MS‐MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of nicotine, five drugs of abuse (morphine, cocaine, codeine, methadone, and 2‐ethylidene‐1,5‐dimethyl‐3,3‐diphenylpyrrolidine) and four metabolites (dihydrocodeine, 6‐acetylmorphine, 11‐nor‐carboxy‐Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol, and benzoylecgonine) in water samples. A Fused‐Core™ particle column was used as an alternative to sub‐2‐μm particles in chromatographic separations to work with low backpressures and high efficiencies in short analysis times. Drugs were extracted from waste and surface water with SPE using Oasis MCX cartridges. Electrospray (ESI) in positive and negative mode and tandem MS selected reaction monitoring mode were used for identification and quantification. Calibration by linear regression analysis with deuterated internal standards was used to compensate the matrix effects. Limits of detection were found as low as 0.5–1 ng/L (surface water) and 1–50 ng/L (wastewater). The method was applied to the analysis of different kinds of samples. Wastewater from a sewage treatment plant was collected from three sampling points (after primary, secondary, and tertiary treatments) for a week. The analysis of the samples revealed a significant presence of these drugs in samples from primary treatments, where maximum concentrations of nicotine (1105 ng/L) and benzoylecgonine (3336 ng/L) were found. Most of the compounds showed values between

A fully automated method for determining nine Environmental Protection Agency N‐nitrosamines in several types of environmental waters at ng/L levels is presented. The method is based on a headspace solid‐phase microextraction followed by GC–MS–MS using chemical ionization. Three different fibers (carboxen/PDMS, divinylbenzene/carboxen/PDMS, and PEG) were tested. Solid‐phase microextraction conditions were best when a divinylbenzene/carboxen/PDMS fiber was exposed for 60 min in the headspace of 10 mL water samples at pH 7 containing 360 g/L of NaCl, at 45°C. All compounds were analyzed by GC–MS–MS within 18 min. The method was validated using effluent from an urban wastewater treatment plant and the LODs ranged from 1 to 5 ng/L. The method was then applied to determine the N‐nitrosamines in samples of different complexities, such as tap water and several influent and effluent wastewater samples from urban and industrial wastewater treatment plants and a potable water treatment plant. Although the analysis of influent industrial wastewater revealed high concentrations of some compounds (N‐nitrosomorpholine and N‐nitrosodimethylamine at μg/L levels), in industrial effluents and other samples, the concentrations were substantially lower (ng/L levels). The new method is suitable for the simple and reliable determination of N‐nitrosamines in highly complex water samples in a completely automated procedure.

This paper describes a method for determining 11 pharmaceuticals in various water sources by SPE followed by LC‐(ESI) MS. SPE was carried out with OasisTMHLB and the recoveries were 33–67% for 250 and 100 mL sewage water, 55–77% for 500 mL river water and 72–98% for 1 L tap water, with the exception of sulfamethoxazole and omeprazole which showed lower recoveries in all kinds of sample. The LODs in river water were of 5 ng/L for sulfadiazine, trimethoprim, sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, and ranitidine and 10 ng/L for the other compounds. The highest concentrations found in river waters were for sulfamethoxazole (50 ng/L). In influent sewage waters, ranitidine was the most commonly detected compound with a maximum value of 0.24 μg/L.

A method for the quantitative determination of ten pharmaceuticals in sewage sludge was developed by using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and HPLC–MS with ESI (HPLC‐(ESI)MS). The PLE was optimized with regard to solvents and operational parameters, such as temperature, pressure, extraction time, and purge time. The optimum conditions were: 50 mM phosphoric acid/methanol (1:1 v/v) as the extraction solvent, temperature of 100°C, pressure of 100 bar, extraction time 15 min, 2 cycles, flush volume 150% and purge time 300 s. All recoveries for pharmaceuticals were over 68% except for salicylic acid. The repetitivity and reproducibility between days expressed as RSD was lower than 8% for repetitivity and 10% for reproducibility. The LOD of all compounds was lower than 10 μg/kg of dry weight of sewage sludge. The method was applied to determine the pharmaceuticals in sewage sludge from two domestic sewage treatment plants (STPs). The samples were collected every three months between February 2004 and June 2005. Some pharmaceuticals were determined in the samples and naproxen showed the highest value (242 μg/kg of dry weight).

A method was developed to determine 11 pharmaceutical compounds in water samples. The method uses SPE and HPLC coupled to MS (LC/MS) using ESI in both positive and negative modes. Three different sorbents were compared for the extraction of analytes from river and sewage treatment plant (STP) waters and OASIS HLB provided the best results. For the solid‐phase extraction of 500 mL of river water samples, the recoveries were between 41 and 101% with the exception of acetaminophen, salicylic acid and naproxen. The LODs were between 3 and 5 ng/L for all the compounds, except naproxen which had an LOD of 15 ng/L. Acetaminophen, caffeine, carbamazepine, bezafibrate and ibuprofen were found in three of the tested river samples at ng/L levels and among them, the highest values were for caffeine and bezafibrate with 305 and 363 ng/L, respectively. For the influent and effluent water samples of the STP, volumes of 100 and 250 mL were used, respectively, to obtain acceptable recoveries. All the compounds showed recoveries between 33 and 91% for effluent samples and 33–72% for influent samples, with the exception of acetaminophen, salicylic acid and bezafibrate, which had lower recoveries. The method developed enabled pharmaceuticals in the influent and effluent sewage waters to be determined in five campaigns carried out between February 2004 and June 2005. Several pharmaceuticals were found in the influent samples: for instance, maximum concentrations of ibuprofen and caffeine were 6 and 40 μg/L, respectively.