Search

Objective: To determine the effect of atorvastatin on haemostatic parameters as measured by prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thromboelastography in apparently healthy dogs administered 2 mg/kg orally once daily for 1 week., Materials and Methods: Prospective study of 20 apparently healthy client-owned dogs at a small animal specialty hospital. Dogs had a baseline complete blood count, serum chemistry profile, fibrinogen, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thromboelastography performed. Each dog was then administered approximately 2 mg/kg of atorvastatin orally once daily for 1 week, and the laboratory tests were repeated. Adverse effects attributed to atorvastatin were recorded., Results: All 20 enrolled dogs completed the study. Dogs received a median dose of 2.06 mg/kg (range 1.94 to 2.44 mg/kg) atorvastatin once daily, which was associated with a significant increase in pulse rate, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, albumin and a significant decrease in mean corpuscular volume, cholesterol and lipase values compared with baseline. On thromboelastography, there was a significant increase in maximum amplitude, G, coagulation index, amplitude at 30 minutes, amplitude at 60 minutes and significant decrease in percentage of clot lysed at 30 minutes and percentage of clot lysed at 60 minutes values compared with baseline. Six dogs had a noticeable increase in appetite., Clinical Significance: The results of this study suggest that atorvastatin may produce a procoagulant effect in dogs, although the clinical significance is unclear. Polyphagia was the most commonly reported adverse effect., (© 2019 British Small Animal Veterinary Association.)

Objectives: To investigate the effect of client complaints on small animal veterinary internists' welfare, job satisfaction and medical practices., Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional anonymous survey study. Between February 1 and March 31, 2017, a web-based questionnaire was made available through the American College Veterinary Internal Medicine sub-specialty Small Animal Internal Medicine E-mail List Serve., Results: A total of 92 completed surveys were available for review. Fifty-nine (64∙1%) respondents received a client complaint during the previous 6 months with cost of care the most common reason (53∙3%). Eighty-nine (96∙7%) respondents worry about client complaints being made against them with 33 (35∙8%) stating they worry "most of the time" or "all of the time." Thirty-two (34∙8%) reported being verbally assaulted by a client in the previous 6 months and 27 (29∙4%) reported being threatened with litigation during the previous 6 months. Sixty-six (71∙7%) have reported changing the way they practice medicine to avoid a client complaint and 40 (43∙5%) have considered changing their career because of complaints made against them., Clinical Relevance: Client complaints are a frequent problem among small animal veterinary internists that have detrimental effects on job satisfaction, psychological distress and medical practices., (© 2018 British Small Animal Veterinary Association.)