1. Ambiguity and Conflict in Policy Implementation: The Case of the New Care Models (Vanguard) Programme in England.
- Author
-
COLEMAN, ANNA, BILLINGS, JENNY, ALLEN, PAULINE, MIKELYTE, RASA, CROKE, SARAH, MACINNES, JULIE, and CHECKLAND, KATH
- Subjects
MEDICAL care ,POLICY science research ,INTERVIEWING ,CONFLICT of interests ,HUMAN services programs ,NATIONAL health services ,MEDICAL protocols ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,GOAL (Psychology) - Abstract
Policy driven change is challenging, with a significant gap between theory and practice. A key tension in enacting such change is achieving a balance between bottom-up development of local, context-specific approaches, and top-down, centrally determined policy solutions and their mutual sequencing. Ideal type models of the policy-making process envisage a rational ordered approach, driven by evidence and accompanied by ongoing evaluation of outcomes (Parsons, 1995, p77); however, the reality is far more complex. We examine the implementation and early operation of the New Care Models (NCM) Vanguard programme in England, using Matland's (1995) ambiguity-conflict model, to explore the aims and expectations of the programme. We consider the relationship between top-down and bottom-up approaches to policy development and draw attention to the pressures coming from what was initially perceived as a permissive policy approach of encouraging experimentation, whilst also requiring rapid learning, scale and spread. We suggest that future programmes for large-scale policy implementation initiatives could be crafted differently to take account of the environment of implementation and render ambitions more realistic. Rather than aiming to create a set of definite products and templates, it may be that a set of principles for design and implementation should be developed and spread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF