Search

Many test coverage metrics have been proposed to measure the deep neural network (DNN) testing effectiveness, including structural coverage and nonstructural coverage. These test coverage metrics are proposed based on the fundamental assumption: They are correlated with test effectiveness. However, the fundamental assumption is still not validated sufficiently and reasonably, which brings question on the usefulness of DNN test coverage. This paper conducted a revisiting study on the existing DNN test coverage from the test effectiveness perspective, to effectively validate the fundamental assumption. Here, we carefully considered the diversity of subjects, three test effectiveness criteria, and both typical and state‐of‐the‐art test coverage metrics. Different from all the existing studies that deliver negative conclusions on the usefulness of existing DNN test coverage, we identified some positive conclusions on their usefulness from the test effectiveness perspective. In particular, we found the complementary relationship between structural and nonstructural coverage and identified the practical usage scenarios and promising research directions for these existing test coverage metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The safety and robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) are currently of great concern. Adequate testing is commonly an effective technique to ensure the software's trustworthiness. However, existing DNN testing methods generate many invalid test inputs, which inevitably brings increased computational overhead and reduces the efficiency of DNN testing. In this paper, we focus on testing task‐specific DNN and investigating diverse, valid and natural test input generation based on data augmentation techniques. Specifically, we propose AugTest, a DNN testing method based on stochastic optimization with momentum, searching for optimal compositions of data augmentation parameters to efficiently generate diverse and valid test inputs. Experimental results show that our proposed method can effectively explore the data manifold space and find valid test inputs with high diversity and naturalness. Compared with the best‐performing baseline, AugTest can generate more test inputs with more average diversity and less average time. Furthermore, the generated test inputs have competitive generalizability to DNNs with different structures. The test error rates exceed 70% when testing other DNN models performing similar tasks using the test inputs generated by AugTest. This implies that our method can produce more valid and generalized data to unveil DNNs' errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]