Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to leverage data-driven approaches, including a novel articulatory consonant distinctiveness space (ACDS) approach, to better understand speech motor control in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)., Method: Electromagnetic articulography was used to record tongue and lip movement data during the production of 10 consonants from healthy controls ( n = 15) and individuals with ALS ( n = 47). To assess phoneme distinctness, speech data were analyzed using two classification algorithms, Procrustes matching (PM) and support vector machine (SVM), and the area/volume of the ACDS. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between bulbar impairment and the ACDS. Analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of bulbar impairment on consonant distinctiveness and consonant classification accuracies in clinical subgroups., Results: There was a significant relationship between the ACDS and intelligible speaking rate (area, p = .003; volume, p = .010), and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) bulbar subscore (area, p = .009; volume, p = .027). Consonant classification performance followed a consistent pattern with bulbar severity, where consonants produced by speakers with more severe ALS were classified less accurately (SVM = 75.27%; PM = 74.54%) than the healthy, asymptomatic, and mild-moderate groups. In severe ALS, area of the ACDS was significantly condensed compared to both asymptomatic ( p = .004) and mild-moderate ( p = .013) groups. There was no statistically significant difference in area between the severe ALS group and healthy speakers ( p = .292)., Conclusions: Our comprehensive approach is sensitive to early oromotor changes in response due to disease progression. The preserved articulatory consonant space may capture the use of compensatory adaptations to counteract influences of neurodegeneration., Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22044320.

Purpose: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects bulbar functions including speech and voice. Voice onset time (VOT) was examined in speakers with ALS in early and late stages to explore the coordination of the articulatory and phonatory systems during speech production., Method: VOT was measured in nonword /bap/ produced by speakers with early-stage ALS ( n  = 11), late-stage ALS ( n  = 6), and healthy controls ( n  = 13), and compared with speech performance decline (a marker of disease progression) in ALS., Results: Overall comparison of the VOT values among the three groups showed a significant difference, F (2,27) = 11.71, p < .01. Speakers in late-stage ALS displayed longer voicing lead (negative VOT) than both healthy speakers and speakers in early-stage ALS. VOT was also significantly negatively correlated with speech performance (i.e., Intelligible Speaking Rate), r (15) = .74, p  < .01., Conclusions: Speakers with more severe ALS showed greater occurrence of voicing lead and longer voicing lead. Findings show voicing precedes articulatory onset with disease progression in the production of bilabial stops, which suggests that the relative timing of coordination between the supralaryngeal structures and the phonatory system is affected in the late stage of ALS.

Purpose Kinematic measurements of speech have demonstrated some success in automatic detection of early symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this study, we examined how the region of symptom onset (bulbar vs. spinal) affects the ability of data-driven models to detect ALS. Method We used a correlation structure of articulatory movements combined with a machine learning model (i.e., artificial neural network) to detect differences between people with ALS and healthy controls. The performance of this system was evaluated separately for participants with bulbar onset and spinal onset to examine how region of onset affects classification performance. We then performed a regression analysis to examine how different severity measures and region of onset affects model performance. Results The proposed model was significantly more accurate in classifying the bulbar-onset participants, achieving an area under the curve of 0.809 relative to the 0.674 achieved for spinal-onset participants. The regression analysis, however, found that differences in classifier performance across participants were better explained by their speech performance (intelligible speaking rate), and no significant differences were observed based on region of onset when intelligible speaking rate was accounted for. Conclusions Although we found a significant difference in the model's ability to detect ALS depending on the region of onset, this disparity can be primarily explained by observable differences in speech motor symptoms. Thus, when the severity of speech symptoms (e.g., intelligible speaking rate) was accounted for, symptom onset location did not affect the proposed computational model's ability to detect ALS.