Search

Odontoid fractures are one of the most common injuries to the cervical spine in geriatric patients. Congenital C1 arch absence, however, is a very rare anomaly found in the population. We describe the first reported case of a congenital C1 posterior arch absence and C1 anterior cleft presenting with odontoid fracture. We present the case of a 58-year-old male who was found to have a comminuted type III odontoid fracture with significant angulation and displacement. CT scan demonstrated this fracture and also demonstrated congenital cleft of his left anterior arch and absence of left C1 posterior arch. Given his anatomic anomaly, we elected to perform occipitocervical fusion. The patient underwent occipito-cervical fusion to avoid iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. He was also immobilized in a halo vest given patient-specific social factors and compromised bone quality. The patient had no intra- or post-operative complications, but a prolonged hospital stay due to alcohol withdrawal. At 3-month postoperatively the patient had no neck pain and return to baseline function. This case highlights the importance of obtaining a CT scan preoperatively to not only to further characterize the fracture but also for surgical planning and recognition of anatomic anomalies as this may significantly impact the operative strategy.

A number of spinal pathologies result in fusion of the spine, including ankylosing spondylitis, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), as well as severe degenerative arthropathies. This fusion of spinal elements may result in spinal deformity affecting any region of the spine. Cervicothoracic deformity resulting in chin on chest deformity is poorly tolerated due to inability to maintain a horizontal gaze. Surgical treatment options for this condition are complex and require extensive discussion between the patient and surgical team. Here we present a case report of a 26-year-old transgender female (male to female) patient with severe chin on chest deformity and a unique pattern of spinal fusion involving only the posterior elements. She underwent C2–T8 posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy and multiple cervical facet osteotomies with good functional result. She did have severe dysphagia and required feeding tube for several weeks but did very well by 1 year postoperatively. While posterior elements of the spine are normally affected first in spondyloarthropathies such as ankylosing spondylitis, the lack of anterior spinal involvement is unique and could be attributed to hormonal therapy in this patient. This case describes a unique pattern of spondyloarthropathy and highlights the importance of a having a multi-disciplinary team for the treatment of patients with complex spinal pathologies.

Intraoperative stereotactic navigation in spine surgery is quickly becoming popularized for accurate placement of spinal instrumentation as well as assisting in the verification of anatomic landmarks. Navigation is less commonly utilized in anterior cervical spine surgery due to instrumentation being able to be placed under direct visualization. The utility of navigation in anterior cervical spine surgery is its ability to aid in the verification of anatomic location, particularly when anatomy is distorted or pathology comes close to critical neurovascular structures. We present a technique guide for anterior cervical spine navigation that we have applied at our institution and have found to be very beneficial in select patients, particularly those with complex anatomy, large body mass index, undergoing revision surgery, sustained spinal trauma and those patients with severe anterior ossification where depth or medial-lateral landmarks are difficult to visualize. We describe utilization of the technique using a case examples and specifically in a patient with significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and severe spinal cord compression that underwent multilevel cervical corpectomy. The described technique was found to be reproducible and effective, allowing cervical spine surgeons to perform more complex or minimally invasive procedures with safety and accuracy. We emphasize that navigation does not replace knowledge of anatomy or technical aspects of the procedure.