Search

Background Atherosclerosis is a systemic inflammatory disease intertwined with neovascularization. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) enables the assessment of plaque neovascularization. This study aimed to explore the systemic nature of atherosclerosis by assessing difference in severity of neovascularization as quantified by DCE-MRI of vertebral arteries (VAs) between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease. Methods Ten consecutive patients with asymptomatic VA stenosis and concomitant symptomatic carotid artery disease (group 1) and 10 consecutive patients with asymptomatic VA stenosis and concomitant asymptomatic carotid artery disease (group 2) underwent 3-dimensional DCE-MRI of their cervical segment of VAs. A previously validated pharmacokinetic modeling approach was used for DCE-MRI analysis. Ktrans was calculated in the adventitia and plaque as a measure of neovessel permeability. Results Both patient groups were comparable for demographics and comorbidities. Mean luminal stenosis was comparable for both groups (54.4% versus 52.27%, P = .32). Group 1 had higher adventitial Ktrans and plaque Ktrans (.08 ± .01 min−1, .07 ± .01 min−1) compared with Group 2 (.06 ± .01 min−1, .06 ± .01 min−1) (P = .004 and .03, respectively). Good correlation was present among the two image analysts (intraclass correlation coefficient = .78). Conclusions Vertebral Artery atheroma of patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease had increased neovessel permeability compared with the patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that atherosclerosis is a systemic inflammatory disease. The VA atherosclerosis is likely to have increased severity of neovascularization if another arterial territory is symptomatic in the same patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enables the identification of inflammation within the atheroma, predominantly by USPIO uptake by macrophages present in atherosclerotic tissue. Diabetic patients, however, may have dysfunctional macrophage activity, which may affect utilization of USPIO in identifying plaque inflammation in this patient cohort. METHODS: Fifteen diabetic and fifteen nondiabetic patients underwent USPIO-enhanced carotid MR imaging using 1.5T MR system. Pre- and post-USPIO carotid MR images were manually coregistered. The percentage decrease in the signal intensity after USPIO administration was calculated as a relative measure of the USPIO uptake. RESULTS: Diabetic and nondiabetic patients had comparable demographics and comorbidities. The mean global, maximum quadrant, and maximum slice changes showing change in relative signal intensity as a result of USPIO administration were comparable for the two patient cohorts (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: USPIO can identify inflammatory burden with carotid atheroma in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.