Search

Objective: Workplace-based assessments (WBAs) play an important role in the assessment of surgical trainees. Because these assessment tools are utilized by a multitude of faculty, inter-rater reliability is important to consider when interpreting WBA data. Although there is evidence supporting the validity of many of these tools, inter-reliability evidence is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of multiple operative WBA tools utilized in general surgery residency., Design: General surgery residents and teaching faculty were recorded during 6 general surgery operations. Nine faculty raters each reviewed 6 videos and rated each resident on performance (using the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning, or SIMPL, Performance Scale as well as the operative performance rating system (OPRS) Scale), entrustment (using the ten Cate Entrustment-Supervision Scale), and autonomy (using the Zwisch Scale). The ratings were reviewed for inter-rater reliability using percent agreement and intraclass correlations., Participants: Nine faculty members viewed the videos and assigned ratings for multiple WBAs., Results: Absolute intraclass correlation coefficients for each scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.47., Conclusions: All single-item WBA scales had low to moderate inter-rater reliability. While rater training may improve inter-rater reliability for single observations, many observations by many raters are needed to reliably assess trainee performance in the workplace., (Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competency-based medical education (CBME) is the future of medical education and relies heavily on high quality assessment. However, the current assessment practices employed by many general surgery graduate medical education training programs are subpar. Assessments often lack reliability and validity evidence, have low faculty engagement, and differ from program to program. Given the importance of assessment in CBME, it is critical that we build a better assessment system for measuring trainee competency. We propose that an ideal system of assessment is standardized, evidence-based, comprehensive, integrated, and continuously improving. In this article, we explore these characteristics and propose next steps to achieve such a system of assessment in general surgery., (Copyright © 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Feedback is critical for learning, however, gender differences exist in the quality of feedback that trainees receive. For example, narrative feedback on surgical trainees' end-of-block rotations differs based on trainee-faculty gender dyads, with female faculty giving higher quality feedback and male trainees receiving higher quality feedback. Though this represents evidence of gender bias in global evaluations, there is limited understanding of how much bias might be present in operative workplace-based assessments (WBAs). In this study, we explore the quality of narrative feedback among trainee-faculty gender dyads in an operative WBA., Design: A previously validated natural language processing model was used to examine instances of narrative feedback and assign a probability of being characterized as high quality feedback (defined as feedback which was relevant as well as corrective and/or specific). A linear mixed model was performed, with probability of high quality feedback as the outcome, and resident gender, faculty gender, PGY, case complexity, autonomy rating, and operative performance rating as explanatory variables., Participants: Analyses included 67,434 SIMPL operative performance evaluations (2,319 general surgery residents, 70 institutions) collected from September 2015 through September 2021., Results: Of 36.3% evaluations included narrative feedback. Male faculty were more likely to provide narrative feedback compared to female faculty. Mean probabilities of receiving high quality feedback ranged from 81.6 (female faculty-male resident) to 84.7 (male faculty-female resident). Model-based results demonstrated that female residents were more likely to receive high quality feedback (p < 0.01), however, there was no significant difference in probability of high quality narrative feedback based on faculty-resident gender dyad (p = 0.77)., Conclusions: Our study revealed resident gender differences in the probability of receiving high-quality narrative feedback following a general surgery operation. However, we found no significant differences based on faculty-resident gender dyad. Male faculty were more likely to provide narrative feedback compared to their female colleagues. Further research using general surgery resident-specific feedback quality models may be warranted., Competing Interests: DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST None., (Copyright © 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Assessing surgical trainee operative performance is time- and resource-intensive. To maximize the utility of each assessment, it is important to understand which assessment activities provide the most information about a trainee's performance. The objective of this study is to identify the procedures that best differentiate performance for each general surgery postgraduate year (PGY)-level, leading to recommendations for targeted assessment., Design: The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) operative performance ratings were modeled using a multilevel Rasch model which identified the highest and lowest performing trainees for each PGY-level. For each procedure within each PGY-level, a procedural performance discrimination index was calculated by subtracting the proportion of "practice-ready" ratings of the lowest performing trainees from the proportion of "practice-ready" ratings of the highest performing trainees. Four-quadrant plots were created using the median procedure volume and median discrimination index for each PGY-level. All procedures within the upper right quadrant were considered "highly differentiating, high volume" procedures., Setting: This study was conducted across 70 general surgical residency programs who are members of the SIMPL collaborative., Participants: A total of 54,790 operative performance evaluations of categorical general surgery trainees were collected between 2015 and 2021. Trainees who had at least 1 procedure in common were included. Procedures with less than 25 evaluations per training year were excluded., Results: The total number of evaluations per procedure ranged from 25 to 2,131. Discrimination values were generated for 51 (PGY1), 54 (PGY2), 92 (PGY3), 105 (PGY4), and 103 (PGY5) procedures. Using the above criteria, a total of 12 (PGY1), 15 (PGY2), 22 (PGY3), 21 (PGY4), and 28 (PGY5) procedures were identified as highly differentiating, high volume procedures., Conclusions: Our study draws on national data to identify procedures which are most useful in differentiating trainee operative performance at each PGY-level. This list of procedures can be used to guide targeted assessment and improve assessment efficiency., (Copyright © 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)