Search

We sought to use the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database to determine if there is an increase in morbidity or mortality when resident physicians independently perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to when an attending surgeon is scrubbed.We performed a retrospective review of 54,144 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare system from 2000 to 2020. Cases were divided into groups based on if the attending was scrubbed or not scrubbed. We then performed 1:1 case matching without replacement based on sex, race, and major comorbidities.Veterans over age 18 undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the VA healthcare system between 2000 and 2020. Cases were excluded if a resident was not involved in the surgery or if the level of autonomy was not defined.Significantly more operative cases were performed without the attending scrubbed before 2003 than after (14.6% vs 1.60%, p0.01). After matching, in 1464 (48.6%) cases the attending physician was scrubbed, and in 1549 (51.4%) the attending physician was not scrubbed. Patients were statistically similar in all measured comorbidities between the groups. Operative time was noted to be slightly longer when the attending was scrubbed (1.86 hours ± 0.79 vs 1.72 ± 0.67, p0.01) as well as increased complication rates (9.0% vs 6.1%, p0.01). No differences existed for 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 0.5%, p = 0.416), postoperative length of stay (2.7 days vs 2.96 days, p = 0.43), or superficial infection (1.9% vs 1.7%, p = 0.73).Our analysis of the VASQIP database indicates that decreased resident supervision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has minimal impact on patient outcomes. Rates of resident independent operating have declined 10-fold since the early 2000's. Further research is required to better define the changes in resident surgical education and their impact on patient outcomes.

Objectives Surgical ethics has been suggested as a distinct field of study apart from clinical ethics due to a unique practice type and treatment dynamic. At our institution, most if not all teaching of clinical ethics is undertaken by nonsurgical faculty. We introduced a novel online Surgical Ethics Program (SEO) in a pilot form (SEO-P) for initial presentation to learners in our environment. The overall goal of our educational intervention was to enhance knowledge, understanding and appreciation for surgical ethics in medical students and to evaluate our curriculum. Setting SEO-P was undertaken over a 4-week period in 2018 with 9 fourth-year medical students enrolled in a surgery elective at our institution. These learners all had career plans in general surgery or a surgical subspecialty. There was 3 weeks of content: (1) background in clinical ethics as it applies to surgical practice, (2) surgical consents and autonomy, and (3) the impaired physician. All pilot learners were evaluated with: (1) postprogram final exam assessment (compared to preprogram knowledge base test), (2) self-reflection essay of ethical practice in surgery, (3) evaluation of 2 case studies, and (4) an assessment of participation in online discussion forums. Postprogram survey of the learners was also undertaken in an anonymous fashion. Results Four of 9 or 44.4% of students scored greater than or equal to 80% on the postprogram knowledge assessment test. A preprogram knowledge-based examination of all learners yielded a mean and standard deviation of 57.1 ± 6.0%. Postprogram knowledge-based test with mean and standard deviation was 78.8 ± 15%. This was a statistically significant increase in scores (p = 0.004; t test). All 9 passed the course with a mean final summative course grade of 95.2 ± 3.2%. From the postprogram evaluation survey, all 7 students who responded felt that the SEO-P would help them become an “ethical” practitioner. Surprisingly, only half of the learners (57.1%) thought “technology used to support the SEO Course (i.e., the chosen curriculum management system) was effective in conducting the course.” Conclusions We set forth to use “web-based” technology to enhance exposure of medical students in our institution to surgical ethics. Hence, we designed our pilot curriculum to be a completely online offering. We feel that the utilization of the surgical voice, that is a surgical ethics curriculum developed by surgeons to explore surgically related clinical ethical issues, is an essential theme and goal of our program. Future challenges will be to present this voice in an effective manner with either an improved curriculum delivery system or by potentially utilizing a blended approach.

Novice learners are increasingly turning to YouTube as a learning resource for surgical procedures. One example of such a procedure is common femoral artery puncture and sheath placement. Practitioners in several specialties perform this procedure to access the arterial system for angiography and intervention. We set forth to compare the techniques demonstrated on YouTube by the various specialists, as well as compare each specialty׳s prevalence on this website.YouTube (www.youtube.com) was accessed in December 2015 at multiple time points with a cleared-cache web browser for the keyword search categories: "femoral artery access," "femoral access," and "angiography access." The top 500 videos from each of these keyword searches were analyzed. Videos were categorized by practitioner specialty, technique, duration of video, age of video, and total views. Videos with clear demonstration of femoral artery access were included in the analysis. All industry videos were excluded from the analysis. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher׳s exact test, and continuous variables were compared with the Student׳s t-test.A total of 2460, 4680 and 1800 videos were found for each keyword search, respectively. Of these, 33 videos clearly demonstrated femoral artery access technique. Vascular specialists, compared to interventional cardiology and radiology, had fewer videos (n = 4 vs. 14) and older videos (3.5 ± 2.1y vs. 2.25 ± 0.5y, p0.05). The vascular specialists demonstrated ultrasound-guided access, while interventional cardiology predominantly demonstrated landmark-guided access (p0.05).Although YouTube and other online resources are being used by novice learners, vascular specialists are underrepresented for femoral artery access, a foundational vascular procedure. Other practitioners demonstrate videos with landmark-guided access and rarely demonstrate ultrasound use. As recognized vascular experts, vascular surgeons should improve their visibility in online learning resources.