Search

Advanced microsurgical procedures are currently limited by human precision and manual dexterity. The potential of robotics in microsurgery is highlighted, including a general overview of applications of robotic assistance in microsurgery and its introduction in different surgical specialties. A new robotic platform especially designed for (super) microsurgery is presented. Results of an in vivo animal study underline its feasibility and encourage further development toward clinical studies. Future directions of robotic microsurgery are proposed., (© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Lymph node transfer has been performed to treat lymphedema for several years. The goal of this procedure is to provide a bridge between the lymphatic system distal and proximal to the lymph node dissection. There is a lack of consensus about the necessity of an additional vascular anastomosis for the transplanted lymph nodes. A systematic literature search in Cochrane Library database CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE of animal studies using lymph node transplantation with and without additional vascularization was performed in March 2016. The strategy used for the search was: (("Models, Animal"[Mesh]) AND (("Lymphedema"[Mesh]) OR "Lymph Nodes"[Mesh]) OR "Lymph Node Excision"[Mesh])) AND ((vascularized lymph node transfer) OR ((non-vascularized lymph node transfer) OR lymph node graft)). The primary outcomes were: survival of transplanted lymph node and lymphatic vessel regeneration. Sixteen studies were included. Vascularization and the use of growth factors were significantly associated with lymph node survival. Lymphatic vessels regeneration was independent from vascularization. According to the results of the current study, additional vascular anastomosis might improve the transplanted lymph node survival. Further studies in both experimental and clinical setting are needed in order to support it. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:32-36. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: This study was to compare the use of one-side versus two-sides recipient vessels in either bilateral breast reconstructions or unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using bilateral DIEP flaps., Patients and Methods: A retrospective review including all cases of bilateral breast reconstructions and unilateral reconstruction with contralateral augmentation with DIEP flaps was performed. Patient's demographics, surgical variables, and outcome were collected. Two distinct cohorts based on the recipient vessel techniques, one-side versus two-sides, were compared., Results: A total of 25 patients with 50 split-DIEP flaps were included, with one-side recipient vessels used in 19 patients and two-sides recipient vessels in 6 patients. Ischemia time was significantly reduced in one-side recipient group compared to two-sides recipient vessels group (62.4 ± 21.3 vs. 105.9 ± 32.5, P < 0.001). There was no statistic difference in venous congestion, partial flap loss, or fat necrosis in both groups., Conclusions: Using one-side recipient vessels for bilateral breast reconstructions with unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using differentially split DIEP flaps presents a high success rate, acceptable ischemia time, and minimal complications for small to medium volume breast reconstructions. Utilizing this method can reduce the ischemia time and spare one side internal mammary vessels. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:5-10. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)