Search

The ideal local treatment modality for pelvic and sacral Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is controversial.We present the data from the American College of Surgeon's National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database to investigate the impact of local treatment modalities on survival for nonmetastatic pelvic and sacral Ewing sarcoma. Local treatment includes "surgery," "radiation," and a combination of "surgery and radiation."A total of 235 cases from SEER and 285 cases from NCDB were analyzed. Patients with "localized" stage (intraosseous) in the SEER database did not show any statistically significant difference in the disease-specific survival (DSS) for any of the local treatment modalities. Similar findings were observed for overall survival among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II and III in the NCDB database. However, patients with nonmetastatic disease, particularly regional disease (extraosseous), showed improved DSS with surgery only, in the SEER.We found similar levels of efficacy for different treatment modalities for patients with intraosseous and AJCC II and III pelvic and sacral EWS. "Radiotherapy" is the most common local treatment modality employed in the United States. A prospective, randomized controlled trial with a direct head-to-head comparison is needed for a definitive conclusion.

BackgroundWe have analyzed sex, race/ethnicity or socioeconomic disparities in the incidence of metastatic bone disease (MBD).MethodsPatients with the diagnosis of MBD at presentation for five most common primary anatomical sites was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Census tract-level dataset. Mean incidence of MBD for different sex, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups were compared.ResultsThe five most common anatomical sites with MBD at presentation include "lung: (n = 59 739), "prostate" (n = 19 732), "breast" (n = 16 244), "renal" (n = 7718) and "colon" (n = 3068). There was an increase in incidence of MBD among cancers originating from prostate (annual percentage change [APC] 4.94), renal (APC 2.55), and colon (APC 3.21) (p

PURPOSE Neoplasms originating from the "small bones of the lower limb and the overlapping joints" are rare but portend a serious prognosis. Current study utilizes a population-based registry in the United States to characterize the malignancies of the foot. METHODS National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database from 1975 to 2017 was queried to report incidence and survival data in 514 patients in the Uited States. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. Chi square test was used to assess the correlation. RESULTS Hematological malignancies constituted 14.8% of the entire cohort. Incidence of the foot neoplasms was 0.024 per 100 000 persons in 2017 and has not significantly changed since 1975 (p > 0.05). Disease-specific-5-year survival for the entire cohort was 73%. On multivariate analysis younger age groups, "localized" stage and extent of surgical resection were predictors of improved outcomes. A significant correlation was found between amputation with male sex and Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS The current study analyzes data from population-based registry reporting incidence and survival data for patients with neoplasms of the foot. Independent prognostic factors include age, stage and extent of surgical resection. Amputation was found to be associated with male sex and Hispanic ethnicity.

Background Primary sarcomas originating from the mobile spine portends a particularly sinister outcome. Rarity of the disease process has resulted in inconsistent data due to small sample size and heterogeneity in patient selection and analytics. Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database from 1975 to 2017 was queried to report incidence and survival data in 712 patients in the United States. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. Results Incidence of spinal sarcoma was 0.019 per 100,000 persons in 2017 and has not significantly changed since 2000 (p > 0.05). Disease-specific 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 57%. Osteosarcoma has the worst 5-year survival (39%) and chondrosarcoma has the best 5-year survival (69%). Independent predictors of survival for the entire cohort included age, grade, and stage. Stage was an independent predictor of survival for every histologic subtype. Additional predictors of survival for spinal osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma included age, size, and grade, respectively. Conclusions The current study is an analysis of a population-based registry reporting incidence survival data for patients with sarcoma of mobile vertebral column. Survival and prognostic factors vary by histologic subtypes. There is lack of improvement in survival over the last three decades.

Background and objectives Computed tomography (CT) measurements of sarcopenia have been proposed as biomarkers associated with outcomes in various cancers and have typically been evaluated at the L3 vertebral level. However, staging imaging for patients with extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often only includes chest CT imaging which precludes evaluation at L3. Therefore, we sought to evaluate muscle metrics at T12 on standard staging chest CT scans and evaluate for correlation with overall and event-free survival in patients with STS. Methods CT chest imaging for 89 patients with intermediate and high-grade STS (53 male, 36 female; 58.5 ± 19.0 years old, follow-up 37.4 ± 27.1 months) was reviewed on PACS at T12 for skeletal muscle density (SMD) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Results Overall survival increased with increased SMD on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61 [0.43, 0.86]) and age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.65 [0.42, 0.89]. Event-free survival also increased with increased SMD in univariate analyses (HR = 0.68 [0.49, 0.95]) but did not maintain significance after adjusting for age (HR = 0.68 [0.43, 1.07]). SMI was not a predictor of overall or event-free survival. Conclusions Higher SMD measured on routinely obtained staging chest CTs in STS patients is associated with improved survival.

Background The prevalence of metastatic bone disease (MBD) grows each year as treatments improve. Little has been published about functional and pain outcomes in this group after surgery. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS® ) can collect information, in just minutes, about patient's physical, mental, and social health. This study evaluated PROMIS® pain and functional scores in surgically treated patients with MBD. Methods Basic demographics and PROMIS® scores were recorded from a total of 13 patients at 9 periods of time over 6 months. Results The average change in physical function at week 1 was -2.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 5.4), at 2 weeks 1.7 (SD = 7.6), after 4 weeks 6.9 (SD = 10), after 6 weeks 6.4 (SD = 10.9), after 10 weeks 15.3 (SD = 3.1), and after 3 months 8.6 (SD = 7.6). The average change in pain inference at week 1 was -1.2 (SD = 7.3), at 2 weeks -2.1 (SD = 9.5), after 4 weeks -12.6 (SD = 4.5), after 6 weeks -8.3 (SD = 10.2), after 10 weeks -16.6 (SD = 4.3), and after 3 months -11.4 (SD = 8.2). Conclusions PROMIS® provides a feasible means to collect data in this population. Trends of improved function and decreased pain were seen after surgery. Continuing this study will hopefully elucidate more insight into the surgical treatment of MBD.

The prevalence of metastatic bone disease (MBD) grows each year as treatments improve. Little has been published about functional and pain outcomes in this group after surgery. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMISBasic demographics and PROMISThe average change in physical function at week 1 was -2.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 5.4), at 2 weeks 1.7 (SD = 7.6), after 4 weeks 6.9 (SD = 10), after 6 weeks 6.4 (SD = 10.9), after 10 weeks 15.3 (SD = 3.1), and after 3 months 8.6 (SD = 7.6). The average change in pain inference at week 1 was -1.2 (SD = 7.3), at 2 weeks -2.1 (SD = 9.5), after 4 weeks -12.6 (SD = 4.5), after 6 weeks -8.3 (SD = 10.2), after 10 weeks -16.6 (SD = 4.3), and after 3 months -11.4 (SD = 8.2).PROMIS

Author(s): Bernthal, Nicholas M; Putnam, Angelica; Jones, Kevin B; Viskochil, David; Randall, R Lor | Abstract: Background and objectivesWhile convention defines atypical neurofibroma as benign and low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) as malignant, sparse outcomes data exist for these tumors. This study reviews clinical outcomes of surgically resected low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, focusing on the effect of surgical margins on outcome.MethodsThis study is a retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection of a low-grade MPNST or atypical neurofibroma. Treatment characteristics of adjuvant therapy and surgical margin were noted. Endpoints of local recurrence, presence of metastatic disease, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were reviewed.ResultsEighteen of 23 patients (78%) had microscopically positive margins on the resection. Disease-specific survival was 100% for both atypical neurofibroma patients and those with low-grade MPNST, regardless of surgical margin. Local recurrence in terms of recurrence of measureable disease occurred in 2/12 (16.7%) of LGMPNST patients and 1/11 (9.1%) of atypical NF patients, all of whom had microscopically positive surgical margins.ConclusionsIn a study dedicated exclusively to "intermediate" nerve sheath tumors, no patients developed metastatic disease nor died of disease despite a high rate of microscopically positive surgical margins (78%). While positive margins did lead to increased rates of local recurrence, these data suggest that surgeons potentially can temper their zeal for negative surgical margins in the setting of low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, as surgical morbidity may be more important than a presumed survival benefit of wide resection.

Background and Objective To examine the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and surgical technique on survival in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Oncology Database, a proprietary database of aggregated tumor registries owned by IMPAC® Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA). Patients who received definitive surgery with negative or microscopic-positive margins were included. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared for statistical significance (P

While convention defines atypical neurofibroma as benign and low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) as malignant, sparse outcomes data exist for these tumors. This study reviews clinical outcomes of surgically resected low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, focusing on the effect of surgical margins on outcome.This study is a retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection of a low-grade MPNST or atypical neurofibroma. Treatment characteristics of adjuvant therapy and surgical margin were noted. Endpoints of local recurrence, presence of metastatic disease, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were reviewed.Eighteen of 23 patients (78%) had microscopically positive margins on the resection. Disease-specific survival was 100% for both atypical neurofibroma patients and those with low-grade MPNST, regardless of surgical margin. Local recurrence in terms of recurrence of measureable disease occurred in 2/12 (16.7%) of LGMPNST patients and 1/11 (9.1%) of atypical NF patients, all of whom had microscopically positive surgical margins.In a study dedicated exclusively to "intermediate" nerve sheath tumors, no patients developed metastatic disease nor died of disease despite a high rate of microscopically positive surgical margins (78%). While positive margins did lead to increased rates of local recurrence, these data suggest that surgeons potentially can temper their zeal for negative surgical margins in the setting of low-grade MPNST and atypical neurofibroma, as surgical morbidity may be more important than a presumed survival benefit of wide resection.

To examine the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and surgical technique on survival in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma.A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Oncology Database, a proprietary database of aggregated tumor registries owned by IMPAC(R) Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA). Patients who received definitive surgery with negative or microscopic-positive margins were included. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared for statistical significance (P0.05) using the log-rank test.Two hundred sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 59 months (range 0.2-186 months). The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) and local failure-free survival (LFFS) were 73% and 66%, respectively. Grade, margin status, and histology were independent predictors for CSS (P0.05). Adjuvant RT was associated with a significant improvement in LFFS over surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.86, P0.05). Patients receiving simple excision and RT had a 5-year LFFS of 88%, significantly higher than wide resection with or without RT (log-rank, P0.05).Adjuvant RT is associated with a lower risk of local relapse compared to surgery alone. The impact of surgical technique on adjuvant RT efficacy warrants further study.