Search

Recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is often managed with a wedge resection (or blebectomy) and either pleurectomy or pleurodesis. There is a conflicting data regarding which approach is superior to reduce recurrence. Our objective is to evaluate the long-term recurrence rates following pleurectomy versus mechanical pleurodesis for recurrent PSP.The PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database was queried for patients aged 10-25 who were presented with PSP and underwent either pleurectomy or mechanical pleurodesis between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome was recurrence and secondary outcomes included 30-day opioid prescriptions, pain diagnoses, and reimbursement. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used with adjustment for age and sex.Of 18,955 patients presenting with PSP, 5.1% (n = 968) were managed operatively with either pleurectomy (18.3%, n = 177) or mechanical pleurodesis (81.7%, n = 791). There was no difference in the rate of recurrence between pleurectomy and mechanical pleurodesis (5-year risk of recurrence: 25.8% versus 26.5%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 1.58]). Furthermore, there was no difference in rate of outpatient opioid prescription (49.2% versus 52.8%, P = 0.58) or pain diagnoses (22.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.46) between pleurectomy and mechanical pleurodesis, respectively. The median reimbursement was higher following pleurectomy as compared to mechanical pleurodesis ($14,040 versus $5,811, P = 0.02).There is no significant difference in recurrence based on type of procedure performed for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, reimbursement is higher following pleurectomy. Given the similar outcomes but higher cost, we recommend mechanical pleurodesis over pleurectomy for recurrent PSP.

Feeding tube placement is common among patients undergoing gastrectomy, and national guidelines currently recommend consideration of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) for all patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. However, data are limited regarding the safety of FJT placement at the time of gastrectomy for gastric cancer.The 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were queried to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Subjects were classified by the concomitant placement of an FJT. Groups were then propensity matched using a 1:1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes of interest were overall 30-d overall complications and mortality. Secondary end points included major complications, surgical site infection, and early reoperation.In total, 2980 subjects underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer, among whom 715 (24%) also had an FJT placed. Patients who had an FJT placed were more likely to be male (61.6% versus 56.6%, P = 0.02), have recent weight loss (21.0% versus 14.8%, P 0.01), and have undergone recent chemotherapy (7.9% versus 4.2%, P 0.01) and radiation therapy (4.2% versus 1.3%, P 0.01). They were also more likely to have undergone total (compared with partial) gastrectomy (66.6% versus 28.6%, P 0.01) and have concomitant resection of an adjacent organ (40.4 versus 24.1%, P 0.01). After adjustment with propensity matching, however, all baseline characteristics and treatment variables were highly similar. Between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-d overall complications (38.8% versus 36.1%, P = 0.32) or mortality (5.8 versus 3.7%, P = 0.08). There were also no differences in major complications, surgical site infection, or early reoperation. Operative time was slightly longer among patients with feeding tubes placed (median, 248 versus 233 min, P = 0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in any outcomes between groups.Concomitant placement of FJT at the time of gastrectomy may result in slightly increased operative times but does not appear to lead to increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Further investigation is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from FJT placement.