Search

Background: Histone deacetylase inhibitors such as valproic acid (VPA) improve survival in lethal models of hemorrhagic shock and polytrauma. Although VPA is known to modulate transcription, its ability to reduce mortality within minutes of administration suggests involvement of a rapid, posttranslational mechanism. We hypothesized that VPA treatment would cause proteomic changes within minutes of treatment including quantitative and/or posttranslational differences in structural and/or effector proteins., Materials and Methods: We used a porcine model of traumatic brain injury (computer-controlled cortical impact, 12 mm depth) and hemorrhagic shock (40% hemorrhage). Animals were kept in shock for 2 h and randomized to two groups (n = 3): normal saline (volume = 3:1 hemorrhage volume) or normal saline + VPA (150 mg/kg, single dose). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at baseline, postshock, and postresuscitation. Intracellular protein profiles were assessed using 1 dimensional gel electrophoresis, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and analyzed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software., Results: Animals treated with VPA demonstrated significant proteomic changes. Quantitative differences were found in over 200 proteins including effector, regulatory, and structural proteins in critical cell signaling pathways. Posttranslational modification analysis demonstrated differential VPA-induced acetylation of lysine residues in histone and nonhistone proteins. Pathway analysis correlated these changes with significant increases in numerous prosurvival and cytoskeletal intracellular pathways, including Rho GTPase signaling (P = 1.66E-11), integrin signaling (P = 4.19E-21), and a decrease in Rho guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor signaling (P = 4.83E-12)., Conclusions: In a porcine model of severe injuries, a single dose of VPA is associated with protective changes in the proteome that are measurable within minutes of treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The feedback medical students receive during clinical rotations, traditionally verbal and not formally captured, plays a critical role in student development. This study evaluates written daily feedback given to students through a novel web-based feedback system., Methods: A Minute Feedback System was used to collect feedback given to medical students during their surgery clerkship from May 2015-April 2016. Using qualitative content analysis, feedback comments were categorized as: encouraging, corrective, specific, and nonspecific. Effective feedback was a combination of specific and either corrective or encouraging feedback; ineffective feedback contained only nonspecific comments; mediocre feedback contained elements of both effective and ineffective comments., Results: 3191 feedback requests were sent by medical students and 2029 faculty/resident feedback responses were received. The overall response rate was 62%. Nonspecific feedback comprised 80% of faculty, 83% of senior resident, and 78% of junior resident comments. Specific feedback was given by only 35% of faculty, 17% of senior residents, and 26% of junior residents. Faculty provided Effective feedback in only 16% of comments, senior residents 8%, and junior residents 17%. Mediocre feedback comprised 13% of faculty, 9% of senior resident, and 7% of junior resident comments. Ineffective feedback comprised 67% of all feedback: 60% of faculty, 72% of senior resident, and 68% of junior resident feedback., Conclusions: The majority of resident and faculty feedback to medical students using an electronic, email-based application during their surgery clerkship was nonspecific and encouraging and therefore of limited effectiveness. This presents an opportunity for resident/faculty development and education regarding optimal feedback techniques., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)