Search

The U.S. EPA developed the Regional Haze Rule to address Section 7491 of the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments to prevent any future and remedy any existing visibility impairment due to manmade air pollution at Federal Class I areas (CIAs). The rule addresses this national goal by requiring states to show they are making progress toward estimated natural conditions by 2064 for the 20% anthropogenically Most Impaired Days (MID). For the MID, days that have high haze contributions from wildfires and windblown dust tend to be excluded using haze contributions from Carbon and crustal material as surrogates. To show progress toward natural conditions in 2064, a Uniform Rate of Progress Glidepath is defined as a straight line from measured 2000–2004 IMPROVE MID Baseline to natural conditions in 2064. Photochemical modeling is used to project the observed IMPROVE 2014–2018 MID visibility to 2028 that is compared to the Glidepath at 2028 to determine whether the MID visibility at a CIA is on a path toward natural visibility conditions in 2064. This paper discusses an alternative approach for showing progress toward no manmade impairment by using modeling results to generate a U.S. Anthropogenic Emissions Rate of Progress (RoP). The CAMx photochemical grid model was run for a current year (representing 2014–2018), 2028 future year and a 2002 past year and source apportionment was used to isolate the contributions of U.S. anthropogenic emissions to PM concentrations and visibility extinction. A RoP slope line is drawn from the 2002 visibility extinction due to U.S. anthropogenic emissions to zero in 2064 and the CAMx 2028 visibility for U.S. anthropogenic emissions is compared with the RoP slope line at 2028 to determine whether visibility due to U.S. anthropogenic emissions is on a path toward no U.S. manmade impairment in 2064. Implications: The U.S. EPA Regional Haze Rule guidance to show progress toward no U.S. manmade visibility impairment at Class I Areas by 2064 backs into the U.S. manmade impairment contribution by using total atmospheric haze based on measured PM concentrations and subtracting uncertain estimates of routine natural and episodic (i.e. wildfires and windblown dust) natural conditions. The guidance also recommends accounting for visibility contributions due to international anthropogenic and prescribed fire emissions that are also uncertain. This paper presents an alternative approach that models the contributions of U.S. anthropogenic emissions to visibility for past, current and future years using source apportionment to show that U.S. anthropogenic emissions visibility impairment at Class I areas are on a path toward no contribution in 2064. Many U.S. anthropogenic emissions (e.g. power plants with continuous emissions monitoring systems) are better known and characterized than international, fire and natural emissions so the alternative approach should provide a better assessment of whether U.S. anthropogenic emissions are on a path toward no manmade impairment in 2064 than using trends in the measured visibility most impaired days that rely on uncertain estimates of haze due to wildfire, windblown dust, and international emissions and uncertain estimates of natural conditions in 2064. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) has developed a modeling platform to simulate the formation of haze-causing particles that impact federally-protected lands in the western United States. To assist state air quality planners in determining which emission sources are likely candidates for future mitigation, several source apportionment scenarios were evaluated, and two sets of results for the year 2028 are presented here: 1) a "high-level important regional sources" version, with broad emission categories (i.e. U.S. anthropogenic, international anthropogenic, natural, and fires), and 2) a "low-level anthropogenic emission sources within individual states" version, which refines the U.S. anthropogenic contribution to specific emission sectors within individual WRAP region states. Eight examples are discussed, which reflect the variation in source apportionment results at national parks, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges in the western U.S. and suggest which emission sectors are candidates for mitigation to improve future visibility. In 2028, the contribution of domestic anthropogenic emissions at the eight sites ranges from 17% to 58%, with significant impacts from oil and gas production, fossil fuel electric generation, and federally-regulated mobile sources. The contribution from international anthropogenic sources can also be considerable, and ranges from 17% to 43%. Most sectors that are emitting sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are the two most likely particle precursors to be curtailed in the states' Regional Haze plans, are declining. For example, in the 13 contiguous WRAP region states, NOx emissions from on-road mobile sources and electric generating units (EGUs) declined by 738 kton/yr (29% decrease) and 65 kton/yr (31% decrease), respectively, in 2028 as compared to current emission estimates, and SO2 emissions from EGUs declined by 42 kton/yr (29% decrease). NOx emissions from oil and gas development also declined by 25 kton/yr (9% decrease) but rose for SO2 emissions by 12 kton/yr (20% increase). Implications: The goal of the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) is to improve visibility at federally-protected areas, and to eventually arrive at natural conditions by the year 2064. Source apportionment tools within regional air quality models are useful for identifying which emission regions and sectors are contributing to haze-causing particles and can indicate to air quality planners where additional emission controls may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 2017 revisions to the Regional Haze Rule clarify that visibility progress at Class I national parks and wilderness areas should be tracked on days with the highest anthropogenic contributions to haze (impairment). We compare the natural and anthropogenic contributions to haze in the western United States in 2011 estimated using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended method and using model projections from the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) and the Particulate Source Apportionment Tool (PSAT). We do so because these two methods will be used by states to demonstrate visibility progress by 2028. If the two methods assume different natural and anthropogenic contributions, the projected benefits of reducing U.S. anthropogenic emissions will differ. The EPA method assumes that episodic elevated carbonaceous aerosols greater than an annual 95th percentile threshold are natural events. For western U.S. IMPROVE monitoring sites reviewed in this paper, CAMx-PSAT confirms these episodes are impacted by carbon from wildfire or prescribed fire events. The EPA method assumes that most of the ammonium sulfate is anthropogenic in origin. At most western sites CAMx-PSAT apportions more of the ammonium sulfate on the most impaired days to global boundary conditions and anthropogenic Canadian, Mexican, and offshore shipping emissions than to U.S. anthropogenic sources. For ammonium nitrate and coarse mass, CAMx-PSAT apportions greater contributions to U.S. anthropogenic sources than the EPA method assigns to total anthropogenic contributions. We conclude that for western IMPROVE sites, the EPA method is effective in selecting days that are likely to be impacted by anthropogenic emissions and that CAMx-PSAT is an effective approach to estimate U.S. source contributions. Improved inventories, particularly international and natural emissions, and further evaluation of global and regional model performance and PSAT attribution methods are recommended to increase confidence in modeled source characterization. Implications: The western states intend to use the CAMx model to project visibility progress by 2028. Modeled visibility response to changes in U.S. anthropogenic emissions may be less than estimated using the EPA assumptions based on total U.S. and international anthropogenic contributions to visibility impairment. Additional model improvements are needed to better account for contributions to haze from natural and international emissions in current and future modeling years. These improvements will allow more direct comparison of model and EPA estimates of natural and anthropogenic contributions to haze and future visibility progress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]