3 results on '"Barnay P"'
Search Results
2. Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.
- Author
-
Rioufol G, Dérimay F, Roubille F, Perret T, Motreff P, Angoulvant D, Cottin Y, Meunier L, Cetran L, Cayla G, Harbaoui B, Wiedemann JY, Van Belle É, Pouillot C, Noirclerc N, Morelle JF, Soto FX, Caussin C, Bertrand B, Lefèvre T, Dupouy P, Lesault PF, Albert F, Barthelemy O, Koning R, Leborgne L, Barnay P, Chapon P, Armero S, Lafont A, Piot C, Amaz C, Vaz B, Benyahya L, Varillon Y, Ovize M, Mewton N, and Finet G
- Subjects
- Aged, Coronary Angiography methods, Early Termination of Clinical Trials, Female, Humans, Long Term Adverse Effects mortality, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Assessment methods, Severity of Illness Index, Coronary Artery Bypass adverse effects, Coronary Artery Bypass methods, Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis, Coronary Artery Disease mortality, Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology, Coronary Artery Disease surgery, Coronary Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Coronary Stenosis etiology, Coronary Stenosis surgery, Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging, Coronary Vessels physiopathology, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial physiology, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention methods, Postoperative Complications mortality
- Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence that fractional flow reserve (FFR) is effective in guiding therapeutic strategy in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond prespecified percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary graft surgery candidates., Objectives: The FUTURE (FUnctional Testing Underlying coronary REvascularization) trial aimed to evaluate whether a treatment strategy based on FFR was superior to a traditional strategy without FFR in the treatment of multivessel CAD., Methods: The FUTURE trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label superiority trial. Multivessel CAD candidates were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment strategy based on FFR in all stenotic (≥50%) coronary arteries or to a traditional strategy without FFR. In the FFR group, revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) was indicated for FFR ≤0.80 lesions. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year., Results: The trial was stopped prematurely by the data safety and monitoring board after a safety analysis and 927 patients were enrolled. At 1-year follow-up, by intention to treat, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates between groups (14.6% in the FFR group vs 14.4% in the control group; hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.36; P = 0.85). The difference in all-cause mortality was nonsignificant, 3.7% in the FFR group versus 1.5% in the control group (hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-5.18; P = 0.06), and this was confirmed with a 24 months' extended follow-up. FFR significantly reduced the proportion of revascularized patients, with more patients referred to exclusively medical treatment (P = 0.02)., Conclusions: In patients with multivessel CAD, we did not find evidence that an FFR-guided treatment strategy reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death at 1-year follow-up. (Functional Testing Underlying Coronary Revascularisation; NCT01881555)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by an academic grant (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National) from the French Government, and the Hospices Civils de Lyon was the academic sponsor, involved in the collection and verification of all the study data. St Jude Medical and Volcano provided 46% of fractional flow reserve wires without any charge. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. High on-treatment platelet reactivity after prasugrel loading dose and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes.
- Author
-
Bonello L, Pansieri M, Mancini J, Bonello R, Maillard L, Barnay P, Rossi P, Ait-Mokhtar O, Jouve B, Collet F, Peyre JP, Wittenberg O, de Labriolle A, Camilleri E, Cheneau E, Cabassome E, Dignat-George F, Camoin-Jau L, and Paganelli F
- Subjects
- Coronary Thrombosis epidemiology, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction epidemiology, Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stents, Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Blood Platelets metabolism, Phosphoproteins metabolism, Piperazines therapeutic use, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Thiophenes therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between platelet reactivity (PR) after a loading dose (LD) of prasugrel and thrombotic events., Background: Post-treatment PR has been shown to be strongly associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clopidogrel era. Prasugrel is a new P2Y(12)-adenosine diphosphate receptor with a higher potency on PR., Methods: A prospective multicenter study included patients who underwent successful PCI for acute coronary syndromes and received prasugrel therapy. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index was measured after the prasugrel LD. High on-treatment PR was defined as a VASP index ≥50%. MACE included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis at 1 month., Results: Three hundred one patients were enrolled. The mean VASP index after 60 mg of prasugrel was 34.3 ± 23.1%. High on-treatment PR was observed in 76 patients (25.2%). Patients experiencing thrombotic events after PCI had significantly higher VASP indexes compared with those free of events (64.4 ± 14.4% vs. 33.4 ± 22.7%; range: 51% to 64% and 5% to 47.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing good responders and patients with high on-treatment PR demonstrated a significantly higher rate of MACE in patients with suboptimal PR inhibition (log-rank p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis found a cutoff value of 53.5% of the VASP index to predict thrombotic events at 1 month (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Patients with minor or major Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting bleeding and those without had similar VASP indexes (30 ± 17.8% vs. 34.3 ± 23%, p = 0.70)., Conclusions: Despite the use of prasugrel, a significant number of patients undergoing PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndromes do not achieve optimal PR inhibition. Such patients have a higher risk for MACE after PCI., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.