1. Prognostic Utility of Right Ventricular Remodeling Over Conventional Risk Stratification in Patients With COVID-19
- Author
-
Nupoor Narula, Arindam RoyChoudhury, Parag Goyal, Ingrid Hriljac, BA Romina Tafreshi, BA Hannah W. Mitlak, Jiwon Kim, Richard B. Devereux, Lishomwa C. Ndhlovu, Leslee J. Shaw, Lakshmi Nambiar, Monika M. Safford, Alexander Volodarskiy, Evelyn M. Horn, DO Sijun Kim, BS Meridith P. Pollie, BA Razia Sultana, Brian Yum, and Jonathan W. Weinsaft
- Subjects
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,echo, echocardiography ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,right ventricle ,COVID-19 (coronavirus) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,RV, right ventricle/ventricular ,Medicine ,echocardiography ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Ventricular remodeling ,IQR, interquartile range ,Original Investigation ,COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019 ,business.industry ,LV, left ventricle/ventricular ,medicine.disease ,CI, confidence interval ,Risk stratification ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Risk assessment ,Cohort study ,TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane excursion - Abstract
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a growing pandemic that confers augmented risk for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and dilation; the prognostic utility of adverse RV remodeling in COVID-19 patients is uncertain. Objectives The purpose of this study was to test whether adverse RV remodeling (dysfunction/dilation) predicts COVID-19 prognosis independent of clinical and biomarker risk stratification. Methods Consecutive COVID-19 inpatients undergoing clinical transthoracic echocardiography at 3 New York City hospitals were studied; images were analyzed by a central core laboratory blinded to clinical and biomarker data. Results In total, 510 patients (age 64 ± 14 years, 66% men) were studied; RV dilation and dysfunction were present in 35% and 15%, respectively. RV dysfunction increased stepwise in relation to RV chamber size (p = 0.007). During inpatient follow-up (median 20 days), 77% of patients had a study-related endpoint (death 32%, discharge 45%). RV dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49 to 4.43; p = 0.001) and dilation (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.96; p = 0.02) each independently conferred mortality risk. Patients without adverse RV remodeling were more likely to survive to hospital discharge (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.90; p = 0.041). RV indices provided additional risk stratification beyond biomarker strata; risk for death was greatest among patients with adverse RV remodeling and positive biomarkers and was lesser among patients with isolated biomarker elevations (p ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, adverse RV remodeling conferred a >2-fold increase in mortality risk, which remained significant (p, Central Illustration
- Published
- 2020