Search

Background: The perception of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) has evolved significantly over the years, primarily driven by increased recognition of acute complications and mortality., Objectives: This study aimed to explore temporal trends in demographic patterns, risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcomes in patients with TTS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with TTS between 2004 and 2021 were enrolled from the InterTAK (International Takotsubo) registry. To assess temporal trends, patients were divided into 6 groups, each corresponding to a 3-year interval within the study period., Results: Overall, 3,957 patients were included in the study. There was a significant demographic transition, with the proportion of male patients rising from 10% to 15% (P = 0.003). Although apical TTS remained the most common form, the diagnosis of midventricular TTS increased from 18% to 28% (P = 0.018). The prevalence of physical triggers increased from 39% to 58% over the years (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in 60-day mortality over the years (P < 0.001). However, a landmark analysis excluding patients who died within the first 60 days showed no differences in 1-year mortality (P = 0.150)., Conclusions: This study of temporal trends in TTS highlights a transition in patients demographic with a growing prevalence among men, increasing recognition of midventricular TTS type, and increased short-term mortality and rates of cardiogenic shock in recent years. This transition aligns with the rising prevalence of physical triggers, as expression of increased recognition of TTS in association with acute comorbidities., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Templin has received institutional grants from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and SMT; and has received consulting grants from Biotronik, Microport, and Innova. Dr Airaksinen has received grants or has contracts with the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. Dr Bauersachs has received grants from or has contracts with Abiomed, CVRx, Norgine, Roche, and Zoll; holds patents PCT/EP2007/008772 and PCT/EP2009/051986 for microRNA and downstream targets for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes; has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, Corvia, CVRx, Edwards, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Vifor; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, and Vifor. Dr Boehm has received grants from or has contracts with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft research support (DFG, SFB-TTR 219, S-01); has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor; and is on the advisory board of Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor. Dr Ferreira has received payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from A Menarini, Medinfar, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and has received payments for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Medtronic. Dr Dichtl has received consulting fees from Reata. Dr Kaiser has received consulting fees from the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Medtronic, Abbott, and Europa Organization. Dr Kobza has received institutional grants on behalf of the Luzerner Kantonsspital from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronik, and Sis-Medical; and has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Koenig has received grants and provision of reagents to the institution from Singulex, Dr.Beckmann Pharma, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Esperion, and Genentech; and has received lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Berlin-Chemie, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. Dr Lüscher has received research or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Vifor; is the president elect of the European Society of Cardiology; is chairman of the research committee of the Swiss Heart Foundation; is President of the Board of the Zurich Heart House; and is Trustee of the London Heart House. Dr Karakas has received grants or has contracts with Vifor Pharma and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received consulting fees or payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Vifor, Pharmacosmos, and Sphingotec; and has received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Sphingotec and Vifor Pharma. Dr Niederseer has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gerson Lehmann Group (GLG) Consulting, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Zoll; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Roffi has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Cordis, Terumo, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; the Department of Cardiology (University Hospital of Zurich/University of Zurich), however, reports research, educational, and/or travel grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, At the Limits Ltd, Bayer, Berlin Heart, B. Braun, Biosense Webster, Biosensors Europe AG, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bracco, Cardinal Health Switzerland, Concept Medical, Corteria, CSL, Daiichi-Sankyo, Diatools AG, Edwards Lifesciences, Guidant Europe NV, Hamilton Health Sciences, IHF, Innosuisse, Johnson/Johnson, Kaneka Corporation, Kantar, Kiniksa, Labormedizinisches Zentrum, MedAlliance, Medical Education Global Solutions, Medtronic, MicroPort, MSD, Mundipharma Medical Company, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Quintiles Switzerland Sarl, RecorMedical, Roche Diagnostics, Roche Pharma, Sahajanand IN, Sanofi, Sarstedt AG, Servier, SIS Medical, Sorin CRM SAS, SSS International Clinical Research, Stromal, Terumo Deutschland, Trama Solutions, V-Wave, Vascular Medical, Vifor, Wissens Plus, and ZOLL. Prof Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; remuneration for the time spent in the following consulting activities were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: AstraZeneca (IMC), Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Citi Research, Klub Class, Novo Nordisk, Radcliffe Group, Stiftung Pfizer Forschungspreis, and Vifor; remuneration for the following lectures were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca (A+ Science AB), Bayer (At the Limits), Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific (CCE Services), Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, C.T.I GmbH, FomF, Hôpitaux Universitaires des Genève (GECORE), Luzerner Kantonsspital, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Medcon, Medscape (WebMD), Medtronic, Medworld, Novartis, Roche, Ruwag, Swiss Heart Failure Academy, The Hong Kong Heart Failure Society, Trama Solutions SL, Inselspital Bern, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Medical Education Global Solutions), Romanian Society of Cardiology, ÖKG Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, and Zoll; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca (IMC/A+ Science AB), Boehringer Ingelheim, Centro Hospitaler de Vila Nova de Gaia, C.T.I. GmbH (Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf), European Society of Cardiology, Monocle, Novartis, Spektar Putovanja, Austrian Heart Failure Association, and Heart Failure Association of the ESC; remuneration for following Advisory Boards were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Bayer, Roche, IMC/AstraZeneca, and Amgen; and he has received secretarial and administrative support of the HFA for his role as President/Past-President for 2018 to 2020. Dr Schunkert has received consulting fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Servier; has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Servier, and Synlab; and has received honoraria for his participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Amgen. Dr Wolfrum has received consulting fees from NVT/Biosensors as well as payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from NVT/Biosensors; and has equities in Hi-D Imaging, Winterthur, Switzerland. Dr Crea has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Menarini, Chiesi, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Conventional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) quantification includes cholesterol attributable to lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)-C) due to their overlapping densities., Objectives: The purposes of this study were to compare the association between LDL-C and LDL-C corrected for Lp(a)-C (LDL Lp(a)corr ) with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in the general population and to investigate whether concomitant Lp(a) values influence the association of LDL-C or apolipoprotein B (apoB) with coronary events., Methods: Among 68,748 CHD-free subjects at baseline LDL Lp(a)corr was calculated as "LDL-C-Lp(a)-C," where Lp(a)-C was 30% or 17.3% of total Lp(a) mass. Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted models were applied for the association between the outcome incident CHD and: 1) LDL-C and LDL Lp(a)corr in the total sample; and 2) LDL-C and apoB after stratification by Lp(a) mass (≥/<90th percentile)., Results: Similar risk estimates for incident CHD were found for LDL-C and LDL-C Lp(a)corr30 or LDL-C Lp(a)corr17.3 (subdistribution HR with 95% CI) were 2.73 (95% CI: 2.34-3.20) vs 2.51 (95% CI: 2.15-2.93) vs 2.64 (95% CI: 2.26-3.10), respectively (top vs bottom fifth; fully adjusted models). Categorization by Lp(a) mass resulted in higher subdistribution HRs for uncorrected LDL-C and incident CHD at Lp(a) ≥90th percentile (4.38 [95% CI: 2.08-9.22]) vs 2.60 [95% CI: 2.21-3.07]) at Lp(a) <90th percentile (top vs bottom fifth; P interaction 0.39). In contrast, apoB risk estimates were lower in subjects with higher Lp(a) mass (2.43 [95% CI: 1.34-4.40]) than in Lp(a) <90th percentile (3.34 [95% CI: 2.78-4.01]) (P interaction 0.49)., Conclusions: Correction of LDL-C for its Lp(a)-C content provided no meaningful information on CHD-risk estimation at the population level. Simple categorization of Lp(a) mass (≥/<90th percentile) influenced the association between LDL-C or apoB with future CHD mostly at higher Lp(a) levels., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The BiomarCaRE Project is funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme Collaborative Project (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. HEALTHF2-2011–278913. The MORGAM Project has received funding from European Union projects MORGAM (Biomed, BMH4-CT98-3183), GenomEUtwin (Fifth Framework Programme FP5, QLG2-CT-2002-01254), BiomarCaRE (FP7, HEALTH-F2-2011-278913), European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE) (FP7, HEALTH-F4-2007-201413), Consortium on Health and Ageing: Network of cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES) (FP7, HEALTH-F3-2010-242244), euCanSHare (Horizon 2020, No. 825903), Digital, Risk-Based Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the European Community project - European Union (AFFECT-EU) (Horizon 2020, no. 847770), and Medical Research Council, London (G0601463, no. 80983: Biomarkers in the MORGAM Populations). This funding has supported central coordination, workshops, and part of the activities of the MORGAM Data Centre, the MORGAM Laboratories, and the MORGAM Participating Centres; MORGAM Participating Centres are funded by regional and national governments, research councils, charities, and other local sources. Dr Schnabel has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 648131), German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF 01ZX1408A), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.; grant no. 81Z1710103); and has received personal fees from BMS/Pfizer. Dr Kee has received funding from the National Institute of Health Research United Kingdom. Dr Salomaa was supported by the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and the Juho Vainio Foundation; and has received grants from Bayer AG. Dr Zeller was supported by the German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.; DZHK, 81Z0710102). Dr Blankenberg has received a grant from Abbott Diagnostics during the conduct of the study; has received grants and personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Bayer, SIEMENS, and Thermo Fisher; has received grants from Singulex; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, AMGEN, Medtronic, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens Diagnostic, and Novartis. Dr Söderberg has been supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20140799, 20120631, and 20100635), the County Council of Västerbotten (ALF, VLL- RV-967561, RV-841381548791), and Umeå University; and has received grants and personal fees from Actelion Ltd. All funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Outside the scope of the present work, Dr Arnold has received consulting fees and grant support from Novartis. Dr Brunner has received grant supports from Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has received nonfinancial support from Abbott, ASAHI INTECC, and Inari Medical; and has received personal fees from Amgen and Novartis. Dr Bay is supported by a grant from the German Heart Foundation (grant no. S/06/23). Dr Koenig has received consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, Esperion, Genentech, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, LIB Therapeutics, TenSixteen Bio, New Amsterdam Pharma, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA agent to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to provide reliable evidence to date on the long-term safety profile of inclisiran., Methods: This post hoc analysis comprised patients treated with 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo in the completed (ORION-1, -3, -5, -9, -10, and -11) and ongoing (ORION-8) trials. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence of reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), abnormal laboratory measurements, and incidence of antidrug antibodies were analyzed., Results: This analysis included 3,576 patients treated with inclisiran for up to 6 years and 1,968 patients treated with placebo for up to 1.5 years, with 9,982.1 and 2,647.7 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that TEAEs that were serious or led to discontinuation; hepatic, muscle, and kidney events; incident diabetes; and elevations of creatine kinase or creatinine accrued at a comparable rate between groups for up to 1.5 years, with similar trends continuing for inclisiran beyond this period. Numerically fewer major cardiovascular events reported as TEAEs occurred with inclisiran during this period. Treatment-induced antidrug antibodies were uncommon with inclisiran (4.6%), with few of these persistent (1.4%) and not associated with greater incidence of TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation or serious TEAEs., Conclusions: Long-term treatment with inclisiran was well tolerated in a diverse population, without new safety signals, supporting the safety of inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG. Dr Wright has received advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received past fees for consulting on lipid issues with The Medicines Company. Dr Koenig has received consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Novartis, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, Esperion, Genentech, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, LIB Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, New Amsterdam Pharma, and TenSixteen Bio; has received lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma. Dr Landmesser has received lecture fees and advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Berlin-Chemie, and Abbott; has received advisory fees from The Medicines Company; and has received grant support, lecture fees, and advisory fees from Amgen, Bayer, and Novartis. Dr Leiter has received grant support paid to his institution and advisory board fees and fees for CME from Amgen and Novartis; has received fees for serving on a steering committee and advisory board fees from Esperion; has received grant support paid to his institution and fees for serving on a steering committee from Kowa, The Medicines Company, and Novartis; and has received advisory board fees and fees for CME from Amarin, AstraZeneca, HLS, Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Dr Raal has received advisory board fees and lecture fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and LIB Therapeutics. Dr Schwartz has received research support paid to his institution from AstraZeneca, Resverlogix, Sanofi, Silence Therapeutics, and The Medicines Company; and has a patent (62/806313) on a method for reducing cardiovascular risk assigned in full to the University of Colorado. Drs Lesogor, Maheux, Stratz, Zang, and Ray were employed by Novartis at the time of analysis. Dr Ray has received support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; his institution (Imperial College London) receives support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London; has received lecture fees from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Cipla, Algorithm, and Zuelling Pharma; has received grant support paid to his institution, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from Amgen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi, and Pfizer; has received lecture fees and fees for serving on steering committees for trials from AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly; has received fees for serving on steering committees for trials from Cerenis Therapeutics, The Medicines Company, and Esperion; has received advisory board fees from Akcea Therapeutics, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, Bayer, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees and advisory board fees from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Dr Reddy’s Laboratories; has received grant support and advisory board fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme; has received fees for serving on a clinical events adjudication committee from AbbVie; and has received fees for serving as principal investigator for a trial from Resverlogix., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interest in the pathophysiology, etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has grown in the wake of multiple natural history studies showing progressively worse outcomes associated with increasing TR severity, even after adjusting for multiple comorbidities. Historically, isolated tricuspid valve surgery has been associated with high in-hospital mortality rates, leading to the development of transcatheter treatment options. The aim of this first Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document is to standardize definitions of disease etiology and severity, as well as endpoints for trials that aim to address the gaps in our knowledge related to identification and management of patients with TR. Standardizing endpoints for trials should provide consistency and enable meaningful comparisons between clinical trials. A second Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document will focus on further defining trial endpoints and will discuss trial design options., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Lawlor has received grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Davidson has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; has received consulting fees from Philips Healthcare; and acts as an uncompensated consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Badhwar has received institutional research support for clinical trials from Abbott. Dr Spitzer has institutional contracts for which he receives no direct compensation with Boston Scientific, Cardiawave, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Shanghai Microport Medical Co Ltd, NVT GmBH, Pie Medical Imaging, and Siemens Healthcare GmBH. Dr Lurz has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lindman has received investigator-initiated research grants from Edwards and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Topilsky has received consulting fees from Edwards, Mitralix, and Mitraltech. Dr Baron has received research support from Abiomed and Boston Scientific Corp; and has served as a consultant, on an advisory board, or as a paid speaker for Zoll Medical, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific Corp, and Shockwave. Dr Chadderdon has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic Inc. Dr Khalique has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Structural, Cardiac Implants, Triflo, and Restore Medical. Dr Tang is a consultant for Medtronic and Abbott Structural Heart. Dr Taramasso has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifescience, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, MEDIRA, CoreMedic, Simulands, MTEX, Occlufit, Ventrimend, and Hi-D Imaging. Dr Grayburn has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L. Gore, Medtronic, Neochord, and 4C Medical; and has served as a consultant or on the advisory board of Abbott Vascular, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L. Gore, Medtronic, Neochord, and 4C Medical. Dr Badano has served as a member of the Speakers Bureau of GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and EsaOte SpA; has served as a member of the clinical event committee valve prosthesis trials for Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research grants from GE Healthcare, and EsaOte SpA. Dr Leipsic has served as a consultant for MVRX, CIRCLE CVI, and HeartFlow; has had an Institutional Core Lab with Edwards, Medtronic, PI Cardia, MVRX, Boston, Abbott, and NEO VASC; has received CT core laboratory grants from Edwards, Medtronic, Abbott, Boston, and PI Cardia; and has served on the Speakers Bureau for GE Healthcare and Philips. Dr Lindenfeld has received investigator-initiated research grants from AstraZeneca and Volumetrix; and has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Alleviant, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Merck, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, VWave, Vascular Dynamics, and Whiteswell. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson and Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and has been a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Vemulapalli has received grants and contracts from the American College of Cardiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, National Institutes of Health (R01 and SBIR), Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Food and Drug Administration (Nest cc), and Cytokinetics; and has received advisory board/consulting fees for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, American College of Physicians, and Total CME. Dr Alu has received institutional research support (no direct financial compensation) from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr Cohen has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Rodés-Cabau has received institutional research grants and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Ailawadi has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Edwards, Abbott, Gore, Anteris, AtriCure, Cryolife, Johnson and Johnson, Philips, and Jena. Dr Mack has served as uncompensated Co-PI of the COAPT trial, funded by Abbott, Co-PI of the PARTNER trial, funded by Edwards Lifesciences, and study chair of the Apollo trial, funded by Medtronic. Dr Leon has received institutional clinical research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifescience, and Medtronic. Dr Hausleiter has received speaker honoraria from and served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention), among high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ticagrelor monotherapy vs continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor after completing a 3-month course of DAPT was associated with reduced bleeding, without an increase in ischemic events., Objectives: This investigation sought to study the clinical benefit of ticagrelor monotherapy vs DAPT by simultaneously modeling its associated potential bleeding benefits and ischemic harms on an individual patient basis., Methods: Multivariable Cox regression models for: 1) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 (BARC-2/3/5); and 2) cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event [MACCE]) were developed using stepwise forward variable selection. The coefficients in the BARC-2/3/5 and MACCE models were used to calculate bleeding and ischemic risk scores, respectively, for each patient (excluding the coefficient for randomized treatment)., Results: In the total study group (N = 7,119), BARC-2/3/5 occurred in 391 (5.5%) patients, and MACCE occurred in 258 (3.6%). There was a consistent reduction in bleeding events associated with ticagrelor monotherapy compared with DAPT across both bleeding and ischemic risk strata (P interaction = 0.54 and 0.11, respectively). Importantly, this benefit associated with ticagrelor monotherapy was not offset by an increase in MACCE at any level of bleeding or ischemic risk., Conclusions: Three months after PCI, discontinuing aspirin and maintaining ticagrelor monotherapy reduces bleeding in both higher-bleeding risk and lower-bleeding risk patients compared with continued DAPT. This benefit does not appear to be offset by greater ischemic risk. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by an investigator-initiated grant from AstraZeneca. Dr Mehta has received grant support from and has served on an executive committee and as site investigator for AstraZeneca. Dr Mendieta has received the post–Cardiology Residency Training Fellowship of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC)-National Center of Cardiovascular Investigations (CNIC) Cardiojoven 2020. Dr Baber has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura; and has received institutional grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr Briguori has received grants from Mount Sinai during the conduct of the study. Dr Cohen has received grant support, paid to his institution, from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular; and has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Collier has served on data monitoring committees sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Devax, Infraredx, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Zoll. Dr Dangas has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Biosensors; has received advisory board fees from AstraZeneca; and has held stock in Medtronic. Dr Escaned has received personal fees from Abbott, Philips, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abiomed, Terumo, and Biosensors. Dr Huber has received personal fees from AstraZeneca and Bayer. Dr Krucoff has received grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Celonova, Medtronic, and OrbusNeich. Dr Kunadian has received personal fees or honoraria from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Amgen, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Moliterno has received institutional support from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the TWILIGHT trial; and has served on data safety and monitoring boards in trials organized by Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Ohman has received grants from Chiesi and Portola; and has received personal fees from Cytokinetics, Abiomed, Pfizer, 3D Communications, ACI Clinical, Biotie, Cara Therapeutics, Cardinal Health, Faculty Connection, Imbria, Impulse Medical, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medscape, Milestone Pharmaceuticals, XyloCor, and Otsuka outside the submitted work. Dr Sharma has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Cardiovascular Systems; and has served on an advisory board for Boston Scientific outside the submitted work. Dr Steg has received grant support from Bayer/Janssen, Merck, Sanofi, Amarin, and Servier; has received fees for serving on a steering committee or executive steering committee from Bayer/Janssen, Amarin, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Idorsia; has received lecture fees from Merck, Sanofi, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; has received fees for serving as co-chair of trials from Sanofi; has received consulting fees from Sanofi, Amarin, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Regeneron, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca; has received fees for serving on critical event committees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; has received fees for serving as chair of a data monitoring committee from Servier; and has received fees for serving as chair of a registry from Servier. Dr Pocock has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Gibson has received grant support from Angel Medical, Bayer, CSL Behring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, and Portola Pharmaceuticals; has received consulting fees from Angel Medical, Bayer, CSL Behring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Portola Pharmaceuticals, the Medicines Company, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, WebMD, UpToDate Cardiovascular Medicine, Amarin Pharma, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Merck, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Somahlution, Verreseon Corporation, Boston Scientific, Impact Bio, MedImmume, Medtelligence, MicroPort, PERT Consortium, and GE Healthcare; has held equity in inference in Baim Institute; has served as chief executive officer of Baim Institute; and has received grant support, paid to Baim Institute, from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. Dr Mehran has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CellAegis, European Center for Cardiovascular Research, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Insel Gruppe AG, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OrbusNeich, Philips, Transverse Medical, and Zoll; has received personal fees from the American College of Cardiology, Boston Scientific, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), Cine-Med Research, Janssen, WebMD, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions; has received consulting fees paid to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, AM-Pharma, Alleviant Medical, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke University, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Novartis, and Philips; has held equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, STEL, and CONTROLRAD (spouse); and has served on scientific advisory boards for and American Medical Association and Biosensors (spouse). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aspirin is the only antiplatelet agent with a Class I recommendation for long-term prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). There is inconsistent evidence on how it compares with alternative antiplatelet agents., Objectives: This study compared P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy vs aspirin in patients with CAD., Methods: We conducted a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy vs aspirin monotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Prespecified key secondary outcomes were major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (the composite of the primary outcome and major bleeding). Data were pooled in a 1-step meta-analysis., Results: Patient-level data were obtained from 7 trials. Overall, 24,325 participants were available for analysis, including 12,178 patients assigned to receive P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy (clopidogrel in 7,545 [62.0%], ticagrelor in 4,633 [38.0%]) and 12,147 assigned to receive aspirin. Risk of the primary outcome was lower with P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with aspirin over 2 years (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79-0.97; P = 0.012), mainly owing to less myocardial infarction (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.90; P < 0.001). Major bleeding was similar (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70-1.09; P = 0.23) and net adverse clinical events were lower (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98; P = 0.020) with P2Y 12 inhibitors. The treatment effect was consistent across prespecified subgroups and types of P2Y 12 inhibitors., Conclusions: Given its superior efficacy and similar overall safety, P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy might be preferred over aspirin monotherapy for long-term secondary prevention in patients with established CAD. (P2Y 12 Inhibitor or Aspirin Monotherapy as Secondary Prevention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [PANTHER collaborative initiative]; CRD42021290774)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by institutional support of the Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, and the Department of Cardiology at Bern University Hospital, which had no role in the data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. There was no industry involvement in the design, analysis, or funding of this study. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca; has received grants and personal fees from Terumo; and has received personal fees from Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Departement Klinische Forschung of Universität Basel, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Swiss, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; is a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration; is an unpaid member of the Pfizer Research Award selection committee in Switzerland and of the Women as One Awards Committee; is a member of the Clinical Study Group of the Deutsches Zentrum für Herz Kreislauf-Forschung and of the Advisory Board of the Australian Victorian Heart Institute; and is chairperson of the ESC Congress Program Committee and Deputy Editor of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. Dr Mehran has served on the scientific advisory boards of the American Medical Association, the American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member), the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member), JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor), and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (Faculty) (no fee). Dr Woodward is a consultant for Freeline; and has recently been a consultant to Amgen. Dr Schunkert has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, Servier, and SYNLAB. Dr Franzone has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, Speaker Bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Edwards Lifesciences and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Bhatt discloses the following relationships—advisory board: AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; board of directors: AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; consultant: Broadview Ventures; data monitoring committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the National Institutes of Health–funded MINT Trial); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor-in-Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), and VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; neither Dr Bhatt nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receive any income from this patent); research funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CinCor, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, Youngene, and 89Bio; royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); site co-investigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, and Vascular Solutions; trustee: American College of Cardiology; and unfunded research: FlowCo and Takeda. Dr Steg has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Sanofi; has received grants and personal fees from Amarin, Servier, and Bayer; has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Idorsia, Pfizer, and Novartis; and has a patent on the use of alirocumab to reduce risk after acute coronary syndrome (royalties to Sanofi) pending. Dr Szarek has served as a consultant or on advisory boards (or both) for CiVi, Resverlogix, Baxter, Esperion, Sanofi, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atherosclerotic plaque ruptures, triggered by blood flow-associated biomechanical forces, cause most myocardial infarctions and strokes., Objectives: This study aims to investigate the exact location and underlying mechanisms of atherosclerotic plaque ruptures, identifying therapeutic targets against cardiovascular events., Methods: Histology, electron microscopy, bulk and spatial RNA sequencing on human carotid plaques were studied in proximal, most stenotic, and distal regions along the longitudinal blood flow direction. Genome-wide association studies were used to examine heritability enrichment and causal relationships of atherosclerosis and stroke. Associations between top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and preoperative and postoperative cardiovascular events were examined in a validation cohort., Results: In human carotid atherosclerotic plaques, ruptures predominantly occurred in the proximal and most stenotic regions but not in the distal region. Histologic and electron microscopic examination showed that proximal and most stenotic regions exhibited features of plaque vulnerability and thrombosis. RNA sequencing identified DEGs distinguishing the proximal and most stenotic regions from the distal region which were deemed as most relevant to atherosclerosis-associated diseases as shown by heritability enrichment analyses. The identified pathways associated with the proximal rupture-prone regions were validated by spatial transcriptomics, firstly in human atherosclerosis. Of the 3 top DEGs, matrix metallopeptidase 9 emerged particularly because Mendelian randomization suggested that its high circulating levels were causally associated with atherosclerosis risk., Conclusions: Our findings show plaque site-specific transcriptional signatures associated with proximal rupture-prone regions of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. This led to the geographical mapping of novel therapeutic targets, such as matrix metallopeptidase 9, against plaque rupture., Competing Interests: Funding Suport and Author Disclosures This work was supported by grants from Novo Nordisk A/S, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, Skåne University Hospital funds, Swedish Society for Medical Research, Swedish Stroke Association, Crafoord foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine, Diabetes foundation, Southern Sweden Regional Research Funding, Albert Påhlssons foundation and Lund University Diabetes Center (Swedish Research Council - Strategic Research Area Exodiab Dnr 2009-1039, Linnaeus grant Dnr 349-2006-23 and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research Dnr IRC15-006). The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Medical Faculty at Lund University, and Region Skåne are also acknowledged for generous financial support. Dr Edsfeldt has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Amgen outside of this study. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The availability of statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors has significantly improved the prognosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). However, a great number of individuals with FH do not achieve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels despite maximal lipid-lowering therapy. Novel therapies that lower LDL independent of LDL receptor activity can help mitigate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in most homozygous FH and many heterozygous FH patients. However, access to novel therapies remains limited for heterozygous FH patients with persistent elevation of LDL cholesterol despite treatment with multiple classes of cholesterol-lowering therapies. Conduction of cardiovascular outcomes clinical trials in patients with FH can be challenging because of difficulty in recruitment and long periods of follow-up. In the future, the use of validated surrogate measures of atherosclerosis may allow for clinical trials with fewer study participants and shorter duration, thereby expediting access to novel treatments for patients with FH., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Malick is supported by a training grant from the New York Academy of Medicine. Dr Koenig has received consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, LIB Therapeutics, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Genentech, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma. Dr Rader is a consultant for Alnylam, Novartis, Pfizer, and Verve; and is chief scientific advisor and current chair of the Board of Directors for the Family Heart Foundation. Dr Rosenson has received research funding to his institution from Amgen, Arrowhead, Lilly, Novartis, and Regeneron; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Arrowhead, CRISPR Therapeutics, Lilly, Lipigon, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and Verve; has received honoraria from nonpromotional educational activities from Amgen and Kowa; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer; has stock holdings in MediMergent, LLC; and has pending patents on analytical methods and systems for biocellular marker and detection using microfluidic profiling (PCT/US2019/026364) and compositions and methods relating to the identification and treatment of immunothrombotic conditions (PCT/US2020/63104926), and quantification of Lp(a) vs non-Lp(a) ApoB concentration novel validated equation (PCT/US2021/63248837). Dr Choi has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) are a source of residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and are indirectly correlated with triglyceride (TG) levels. Previous clinical trials studying TG-lowering therapies have either failed to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events or shown no linkage of TG reduction with event reduction, particularly when these agents were tested on a background of statin therapy. Limitations in trial design may explain this lack of efficacy. With the advent of new RNA-silencing therapies in the TG metabolism pathway, there is renewed focus on reducing TRLs for major adverse cardiovascular event reduction. In this context, the pathophysiology of TRLs, pharmacological effects of TRL-lowering therapies, and optimal design of cardiovascular outcomes trials are major considerations., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Malick is funded by a training grant from the New York Academy of Medicine. Dr Do has received grants from AstraZeneca; has received grants and nonfinancial support from Goldfinch Bio; is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (R35-GM124836) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL139865 and R01-HL155915); is a scientific cofounder, consultant, and equity holder for Pensieve Health; and is a consultant for Variant bio, all not related to this work. Dr Koenig has received consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia, Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, LIB Therapeutics, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Genentech, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma. Dr Pradhan has received research grants from Kowa Research Europe, Kowa Research Institute, and Denka; has received consulting fees from Optum, Novo Nordisk, and Reliant Medical Foundation; and has received compensation for CME lectures from Medtelligence, PER, and NACE. Dr Stroes has received lecturing/advisory board fees paid to the institution from Amgen, Sanofi, Esperion, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Merck, Daiichi-Sankyo, Amarin, and Ionis. Dr Rosenson has received grants from Amgen, Arrowhead, Lilly, Novartis and Regeneron; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Arrowhead, CRISPR Therapeutics, Lilly, Lipigon, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and Verve; has received an honorarium from nonpromotional educational activities from Amgen and Kowa; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer; has stock holdings in MediMergent, LLC, all not related to this work; and is supported by National Institute of Aging of the National Institutes of Health (5R01-AG061186-04). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a source of residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Clinical trials of fully human monoclonal antibodies targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 have shown that reductions in Lp(a) concentrations may be a predictor of event reduction with this class of cholesterol-lowering therapy. With the advent of selective therapies targeting Lp(a) such as antisense oligonucleotides, small-interfering RNA-based therapies, and gene editing, lowering of Lp(a) may lead to reduction in ASCVD. The phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON (Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Lowering with TQJ230 on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With CVD) outcomes trial is currently testing the effect of pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, on ASCVD risk. Olpasiran is a small-interfering RNA that is in a phase 3 clinical trial. As these therapies enter clinical trials, challenges in trial design will have to be addressed to optimize patient selection and outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Malick is supported by a training grant from the New York Academy of Medicine. Dr Goonewardena has pending patents on analytical methods and systems for biocellular marker and detection using microfluidic profiling (PCT/US2019/026364) and compositions and methods relating to the identification and treatment of immunothrombotic conditions (PCT/US2020/63104926). Dr Koenig has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia, Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, LIB Therapeutics, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Genentech, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma. Dr Rosenson has received research funding to his institution from Amgen, Arrowhead, Lilly, Novartis, and Regeneron; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Arrowhead, CRISPR Therapeutics, Lilly, Lipigon, Novartis, Precision Biosciences, and Verve; has received honoraria from nonpromotional educational activities from Amgen and Kowa; has received royalties from Wolters Kluwer; has stock holdings in MediMergent, LLC; and has pending patents on analytical methods and systems for biocellular marker and detection using microfluidic profiling (PCT/US2019/026364) and compositions and methods relating to the identification and treatment of immunothrombotic conditions (PCT/US2020/63104926), and quantification of Lp(a) vs non-Lp(a) apo B concentration novel validated equation (PCT/US2021/63248837)., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Regular exercise that meets or exceeds the current physical activity guidelines is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Therefore, exercise training plays an important role in primary and secondary prevention of CVD. In this part 1 of a 4-part focus seminar series, we highlight the mechanisms and physiological adaptations responsible for the cardioprotective effects of exercise. This includes an increase in cardiorespiratory fitness secondary to cardiac, vascular, and skeletal muscle adaptations and an improvement in traditional and nontraditional CVD risk factors by exercise training. This extends to the role of exercise and its prescription in patients with CVDs (eg, coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, peripheral artery disease, or atrial fibrillation) with special focus on the optimal mode, dosage, duration, and intensity of exercise to reduce CVD risk and improve clinical outcomes in these patients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Kovacic is the recipient of an Agilent Thought Leader Award (January 2022), which includes funding for research that is unrelated to the current paper; and has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (R01HL148167), New South Wales health grant RG194194, the Bourne Foundation, and Agilent. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This review compares the primary prevention recommendations of the recent 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2019 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Although the 2019 ACC/AHA guideline represents its inaugural version, the ESC guideline is an update to its 2016 statement. Both guidelines address prevention using a holistic approach and agree on the importance of lifestyle optimization and intensified risk factor management. Cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment tools differ, reflecting the unique populations being screened as well as philosophical differences to their approach. Conventional risk factors are used to estimate CV risk, but each guideline acknowledges the role of risk modifiers to refine risk calculation. The ESC guideline recognizes the importance of nonclassical risk factors, including environmental issues, that impact CV health at the population level and calls for legislative action at the local, regional, and national levels., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Yang has received grant support from Amgen; has ownership in Clocktree; and has been a consultant to Genentech. Dr Gianos has received grant support from AstraZeneca; and has been a consultant to Med-IQ. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is frequently used as a valuable prognostic biomarker in cardiac diseases. In children, however, it has not been established because of its strong age dependency. To overcome this obstacle, we recently introduced the zlog value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (zlog-proBNP) as an age-adjusted reference., Objectives: This study evaluates the prognostic power of zlog-proBNP for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) throughout childhood in patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD)., Methods: A total of 910 children with CHD (median age 5 months; range 0.0-18.0 years) were included. MACE was defined as death, resuscitation, mechanical circulatory support, or hospitalization caused by cardiac decompensation. Because the physiological NT-proBNP concentration decreases significantly during childhood, zlog values were applied for an age-independent evaluation., Results: MACE occurred in 138 children during a median follow-up of 6 months (range 1 day to 7.6 years). High zlog-proBNP values (>+3.0) were most strongly associated with adverse events (n = 93; adjusted HR: 21.1; 95% CI: 2.9-154.2; P < 0.001). Among all evaluated indicators, zlog-proBNP was the best predictor for MACE (adjusted HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.31-1.76; P < 0.001) along with age and predictively superior to absolute NT-proBNP values. A cutoff value of +1.96 (age-independent upper limit of the physiological NT-proBNP concentration) achieved a negative predictive value of >96%., Conclusions: Zlog-proBNP overcomes the strong age dependency of NT-proBNP and is a powerful prognostic marker for age-independent exclusion and prediction of MACE in children with CHD. We therefore expect zlog-proBNP to play a pivotal role in the future management of children with heart diseases., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is a result of afterload-increasing pathologies including untreated hypertension and aortic stenosis. It features progressive adverse cardiac remodeling, myocardial dysfunction, capillary rarefaction, and interstitial fibrosis often leading to heart failure., Objectives: This study aimed to establish a novel porcine model of pressure-overload-induced heart failure and to determine the effect of inhibition of microribonucleic acid 132 (miR-132) on heart failure development in this model., Methods: This study developed a novel porcine model of percutaneous aortic constriction by implantation of a percutaneous reduction stent in the thoracic aorta, inducing progressive remodeling at day 56 (d56) after pressure-overload induction. In this study, an antisense oligonucleotide specifically inhibiting miR-132 (antimiR-132), was regionally applied via intracoronary injection at d0 (percutaneous transverse aortic constriction induction) and d28., Results: At d56, antimiR-132 treatment diminished cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area (188.9 ± 2.8 vs. 258.4 ± 9.0 μm 2 in untreated hypertrophic hearts) and improved global cardiac function (ejection fraction 48.9 ± 1.0% vs. 36.1 ± 1.7% in control hearts). Moreover, at d56 antimiR-132-treated hearts displayed less increase of interstitial fibrosis compared with sham-operated hearts (Δsham 1.8 ± 0.5%) than control hearts (Δsham 10.8 ± 0.6%). Of note, cardiac platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 + capillary density was higher in the antimiR-132-treated hearts (647 ± 20 cells/mm 2 ) compared with in the control group (485 ± 23 cells/mm 2 )., Conclusions: The inhibition of miR-132 is a valid strategy in prevention of heart failure progression in hypertrophic heart disease and may be developed as a treatment for heart failure of nonischemic origin., Competing Interests: FUNDING SUPPORT AND AUTHOR DISCLOSURES This study was supported by the Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) (to Drs. Hinkel, Weber, Engelhardt, Laugwitz, Moretti, and Kupatt) and, with regard to model development, by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) (TRR 267 to Drs. Thum, Weber, Engelhardt, Laugwitz, and Kupatt.; and KFO311 to Dr. Thum.). Drs. Baktai and Thum are founders of Cardior Pharmaceuticals GmbH and hold shares. Dr. Thum filed and licensed patents in the field of noncoding ribonucleic acids including miR-132. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have different analytic characteristics., Objectives: The goal of this study was to quantify differences between assays for common analytical benchmarks and to determine whether they may result in differences in the management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Methods: The authors included patients with suspected ACS enrolled in the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer Assisted Tomography) I and II trials, with blood samples taken at emergency department presentation (ROMICAT-I and -II) or at 2 and 4 h thereafter (ROMICAT-II). hs-cTn concentrations were measured using 3 assays (Roche Diagnostics, Elecsys 2010 platform; Abbott Diagnostics, ARCHITECT i2000SR; Siemens Diagnostics, HsVista). Per blood sample, we determined concordance across analytic benchmarks (99th percentile). Per-patient, the authors determined concordance of management recommendations (rule-out/observe/rule-in) per the 0/2-h algorithm, and their association with diagnostic test findings (coronary artery stenosis >50% on coronary computed tomography angiography or inducible ischemia on perfusion imaging) and ACS., Results: Among 1,027 samples from 624 patients (52.8 ± 10.0 years; 39.4% women), samples were classified as 99th percentile (7.2% vs. 6.0% vs. 6.2%) by Roche, Abbott, and Siemens, respectively. A total of 37.4% (n = 384 of 1,027) of blood samples were classified into the same analytical benchmark category, with low concordance across benchmarks (99th percentile 43.6%). Serial samples were available in 242 patients (40.1% women; mean age: 52.8 ± 8.0 years). The concordance of management recommendations across assays was 74.8% (n = 181 of 242) considering serial hs-cTn measurements. Of patients who were recommended to discharge, 19.6% to 21.1% had positive diagnostic test findings and 2.8% to 4.3% had ACS at presentation., Conclusions: Caregivers should be aware that there are significant differences between hs-cTn assays in stratifying individual samples and patients with intermediate likelihood of ACS according to analytical benchmarks that may result in different management recommendations. (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography [ROMICAT]; NCT00990262) (Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography [ROMICAT-II]; NCT01084239)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Karády has received grant support from the Fulbright Visiting Researcher Grant (E0583118), and the Rosztoczy Foundation. Dr. Ferencik has been supported by a grant from the American Heart Association (Fellow to Faculty Award #13FTF16450001). Dr. Peacock has received grant support from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Braincheck, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Immunarray, Janssen, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Portola, Relypsa, Roche, Salix, and Siemens; has received consulting income from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beckman, Boehrhinger Ingelheim, Ischemia Care, Dx, Immunarray, Instrument Labs, Janssen, Nabriva, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Relypsa, Roche, Quidel, Salix, and Siemens; has provided expert testimony for Johnson and Johnson; and has stock/ownership interest in AseptiScope Inc., Brainbox Inc., Comprehensive Research Associates LLC, Emergencies in Medicine LLC, and Ischemia DX LLC. Dr. Nagurney has received research funds from Roche Diagnostics, Ortho Diagnostics, and Alere/Biosite to the Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Januzzi has been a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology, and a board member of Imbria Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Roche Diagnostics, Abbott, Singulex, and Prevencio; has received consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Takeda. Dr. Koenig has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor, Kowa, Amgen, Corvidia, Berlin-Chemie, and Sanofi; and has received grants and nonfinancial support from Beckmann, Singulex, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hoffmann has received research support on behalf of his institution from Duke University (Abbott), HeartFlow, Kowa Company Limited, and MedImmune/AstraZeneca; and has received consulting fees from Duke University (NIH), and Recor Medical, unrelated to this research. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran., Methods: Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C-lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed., Results: A total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was -50.7% (95% confidence interval: -52.9% to -48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was -50.5% (95% confidence interval: -52.1% to -48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups., Conclusions: These pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The analyses presented here were funded by Novartis Pharma AG. Statistical analysis was carried out by Summit Analytical, with funding from Novartis Pharma AG, Basel. Dr. Wright has received support from the Mayo Clinic and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) contract 75A50120C00096; has received fees for serving on steering committees from Boehringer Ingelheim and The Medicines Company; and has nonfinancial conflicts with AstraZeneca and Novartis. Dr. Ray has received support from the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; has received lecture fees from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Cipla, Algorithm, and Zuelling Pharma; has received grant support, paid to his institution, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from Amgen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi, and Pfizer; has received lecture fees and fees for serving on steering committees for trials from AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly; has received fees for serving on steering committees for trials from Cerenis Therapeutics, The Medicines Company, and Esperion; has received advisory board fees from Akcea Therapeutics, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, Bayer, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees and advisory board fees from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; has received grant support and advisory board fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme; has received fees for serving on a clinical events adjudication committee from AbbVie; and has received fees for serving as principal investigator for a trial from Resverlogix. Dr. Raal has received advisory board fees and lecture fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and The Medicines Company. Dr. Kallend was employed by and held stock options in The Medicines Company at the time of study; and was employed by DalCor Pharmaceuticals at the time of publication. Dr. Jaros has received fees for providing statistical analysis for trials from The Medicines Company and Novartis. Dr. Koenig has received consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; has received consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and has received grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr. Beckmann Pharma. Dr. Leiter has received grant support paid to his institution, advisory board fees, and fees for CME from Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi; has received fees for serving on a steering committee from Esperion; has received grant support paid to his institution and fees for serving on a steering committee from Kowa, The Medicines Company, and Novartis; has received advisory board fees and fees for CME from Merck; and has received advisory board fees from HLS Therapeutics. Dr. Landmesser has received lecture fees and advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Berlin Chemie, Novartis, and Abbott; has received advisory fees from The Medicines Company; and has received grant support, lecture fees, and advisory fees from Bayer. Dr. Schwartz has received research support, paid to his institution, from AstraZeneca, Resverlogix, Roche, and The Medicines Company; and has a patent (62/806313) on a method for reducing cardiovascular risk assigned in full to the University of Colorado. Dr. Friedman was employed by and held shares and stock options in The Medicines Company at the time of the study; and was employed by Novartis at the time of publication. Dr. Wijngaard was employed by and held shares and stock options in The Medicines Company at the time of the study; and was employed by and held shares and stock options in Novartis at the time of publication. Dr. Kastelein has received consulting fees from Akcea Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, CiVi Biopharma, Corvidia Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Draupnir Bio, Esperion, Gemphire Therapeutics, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Matinas BioPharma, NorthSea Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, REGENXBIO, Staten Biotechnology, and 89bio. Dr. Garcia Conde was employed by Novartis at the the time of publication., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend intensified platelet inhibition by prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with unstable angina (UA) or non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction (MI)., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the benefits and risks of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and planned invasive management., Methods: This post hoc analysis combines the pre-specified subgroups of UA and NSTEMI of the randomized ISAR-REACT 5 trial. It included 1,179 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1,186 assigned to prasugrel. Ticagrelor was started immediately after randomization and prasugrel after coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, MI, or stroke during 1-year follow-up, and the safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class 3-5., Results: The primary endpoint was reached in 101 (8.7%) patients in the ticagrelor and in 73 (6.3%) patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.90). The HR for all-cause death was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.93 to 2.21) and that for MI 1.43 (95% CI: 0.94 to 2.19). The safety endpoint occurred in 49 (5.2%) patients in the ticagrelor and in 41 (4.7%) patients in the prasugrel group (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.65). Landmark analysis revealed persistence of the efficacy advantage with prasugrel after the first month., Conclusions: In patients with NSTE-ACS, we found that prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in reducing the combined 1-year risk of death, MI, and stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding. Due to the post hoc nature of the analysis, these findings need confirmation by further studies. (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome; NCT01944800)., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry Dr. Neumann has received lecture fees, paid to his institution, from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Ferrer; has received lecture fees, paid to his institution, and consulting fees, paid to his institution, from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received grant support and lecture fees, paid to his institution, from Pfizer, Biotronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Bayer HealthCare, and GlaxoSmithKline; and has received grant support from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Sibbing has received personal fees from Bayer AG, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Ferrer, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and has received grants and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payments for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr. Liebetrau has received consulting fees or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, and Thermo Fisher; and has received research grants from Deutsche Herzstiftung, Kerckhoff-Stiftung, and Kühl-Stiftung outside the submitted work. Dr. Liebetrau’s institution has received payments for participation in clinical study programs from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Neovasc. Dr. Hamm has received Advisory Board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Sager has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (STRATO), the Else-Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, the Deutsche Herzstiftung, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Dr. Joner has received personal fees from Biotronik, Orbus Neich, Boston Scientific, Edwards, AstraZeneca, and Recor; and has received grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards, and Amgen. Dr. Trenk has received consulting fees or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Deutsche Herzstiftung and PharmCompNet Baden-Wuerttemberg: Kompetenznetzwerk Pharmakologie Baden-Wuerttemberg outside the submitted work. Dr. Trenk’s institution has received payments for participation in clinical study programs from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Doasense, Esperion, Idorsia, and Otsuka. Dr. Schunkert has received personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Amgen, Bayer Vital GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Servier, Brahms, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Sanofi, Synlab, Pfizer, and Vifor; and has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca. Dr. Schüpke has received grants from the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung; has received consulting fees from Bayer Vital GmbH; and has received lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Outcome data after extended long-term follow-up of patients with coronary artery disease treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) in randomized clinical trials are scant., Objectives: Performance differences among devices may be expected to emerge over time depending on whether stenting is done with polymer-free or durable polymer DES. This study assessed the 10-year outcomes of patients enrolled in the ISAR-TEST-5 (Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial., Methods: A total of 3,002 patients were randomized to treatment with either polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 2,002) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 1,000). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (a device-oriented composite endpoint [DOCE]). Additional endpoints of interest were the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization; individual components of the composite endpoints; and definite or probable stent thrombosis., Results: The median age of the patients at randomization was 67.8 years. At 10 years, 63.9% of patients were alive. The rates of DOCE and POCE were high in both groups with no difference in the incidence between polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents and durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (DOCE: 43.8% vs. 43.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89 to 1.14; p = 0.90; POCE: 66.2% vs. 67.7%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.04; p = 0.22). The rates of the individual components of the composite endpoints were comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis over 10 years was low and comparable in both groups (1.6% vs. 1.9%; hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.54; p = 0.58)., Conclusions: At 10 years, there were no measurable differences in outcomes between patients treated with polymer-free versus durable polymer DES. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups. High overall adverse clinical event rates were observed during extended follow-up. (Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents [ISAR-TEST-5]; NCT00598533)., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) requiring reintervention, it is unclear if the choice of treatment should depend on whether the restenotic stent was a bare-metal stent (BMS) or a drug-eluting stent (DES)., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of the 2 most frequently used treatments - angioplasty with drug-coated balloon (DCB) and repeat stenting DES - in patients with BMS-and DES-ISR., Methods: The DAEDALUS (Difference in Antirestenotic Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stent and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Occurrence of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis) study was a pooled analysis of individual patient data from all 10 existing randomized clinical trials comparing DCB angioplasty with repeat DES implantation for the treatment of coronary ISR. In this pre-specified analysis, patients were stratified according to BMS- versus DES-ISR and treatment assigned. The primary efficacy endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis at 3 years. Primary analysis was performed by mixed-effects Cox models accounting for the trial of origin. Secondary analyses included nonparsimonious multivariable adjustment accounting also for multiple lesions per patient and 2-stage analyses., Results: A total of 710 patients with BMS-ISR (722 lesions) and 1,248 with DES-ISR (1,377 lesions) were included. In patients with BMS-ISR, no significant difference between treatments was observed in terms of primary efficacy (9.2% vs. 10.2%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51 to 1.37) and safety endpoints (8.7% vs. 7.5%; HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.96); results of secondary analyses were consistent. In patients with DES-ISR, the risk of the primary efficacy endpoint was higher with DCB angioplasty than with repeat DES implantation (20.3% vs. 13.4%; HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.13), whereas the risk of the primary safety endpoint was numerically lower (9.5% vs. 13.3%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.00); results of secondary analyses were consistent. Regardless of the treatment used, the risk of TLR was lower in BMS- versus DES-ISR (9.7% vs. 17.0%; HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.74), whereas safety was not significantly different between ISR types., Conclusions: At 3-year follow-up, DCB angioplasty and repeat stenting with DES are similarly effective and safe in the treatment of BMS-ISR, whereas DCB angioplasty is significantly less effective than repeat DES implantation in the treatment DES-ISR, and associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the primary composite safety endpoint. Overall, DES-ISR is associated with higher rates of treatment failure and similar safety compared with BMS-ISR., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) occurs predominantly in post-menopausal women but is also found in younger patients., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate age-related differences in TTS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with TTS and enrolled in the International Takotsubo Registry between January 2011 and February 2017 were included in this analysis and were stratified by age (younger: ≤50 years, middle-age: 51 to 74 years, elderly: ≥75 years). Baseline characteristics, hospital course, as well as short- and long-term mortality were compared among groups., Results: Of 2,098 TTS patients, 242 (11.5%) patients were ≤50 years of age, 1,194 (56.9%) were 51 to 74 years of age, and 662 (31.6%) were ≥75 years of age. Younger patients were more often men (12.4% vs. 10.9% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.002) and had an increased prevalence of acute neurological (16.3% vs. 8.4% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.001) or psychiatric disorders (14.1% vs. 10.3% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001) compared with middle-aged and elderly TTS patients. Furthermore, younger patients had more often cardiogenic shock (15.3% vs. 9.1% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.004) and had a numerically higher in-hospital mortality (6.6% vs. 3.6% vs. 5.1%; p = 0.07). At multivariable analysis, younger (odds ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 3.01; p = 0.14) and older age (odds ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.80; p = 0.75) were not independently associated with in-hospital mortality using the middle-aged group as a reference. There were no differences in 60-day mortality rates among groups., Conclusions: A substantial proportion of TTS patients are younger than 50 years of age. TTS is associated with severe complications requiring intensive care, particularly in younger patients., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: miR-21 is a central regulator of cardiac fibrosis, and its inhibition in small-animal models has been shown to be an effective antifibrotic strategy in various organs, including the heart. Effective delivery of therapeutic antisense micro-ribonucleic acid (antimiR) molecules to the myocardium in larger organisms is challenging, though, and remains to be established for models of chronic heart failure., Objectives: The aims of this study were to test the applicability and therapeutic efficacy of local, catheter-based delivery of antimiR-21 in a pig model of heart failure and determine its effect on the cardiac transcriptomic signature and cellular composition., Methods: Pigs underwent transient percutaneous occlusion of the left coronary artery and were followed up for 33 days. AntimiR-21 (10 mg) was applied by intracoronary infusion at days 5 and 19 after the injury. Cardiac function was assessed in vivo, followed by histological analyses and deep ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNA-seq) of the myocardium and genetic deconvolution analysis., Results: AntimiR-21 effectively suppressed the remodeling-associated increase of miR-21. At 33 days after ischemia/reperfusion injury, LNA-21-treated hearts exhibited reduced cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy and improved cardiac function. Deep RNA-seq revealed a significant derepression of the miR-21 targetome in antimiR-21-treated myocardium and a suppression of the inflammatory response and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. A genetic deconvolution approach built on deep RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq data identified reductions in macrophage and fibroblast numbers as the key cell types affected by antimiR-21 treatment., Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence for the feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of miR-21 inhibition in a large animal model of heart failure., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subclinical changes on the electrocardiogram are risk factors for cardiovascular mortality. Recognition and knowledge of electrolyte associations in cardiac electrophysiology are based on only in vitro models and observations in patients with severe medical conditions., Objectives: This study sought to investigate associations between serum electrolyte concentrations and changes in cardiac electrophysiology in the general population., Methods: Summary results collected from 153,014 individuals (54.4% women; mean age 55.1 ± 12.1 years) from 33 studies (of 5 ancestries) were meta-analyzed. Linear regression analyses examining associations between electrolyte concentrations (mmol/l of calcium, potassium, sodium, and magnesium), and electrocardiographic intervals (RR, QT, QRS, JT, and PR intervals) were performed. The study adjusted for potential confounders and also stratified by ancestry, sex, and use of antihypertensive drugs., Results: Lower calcium was associated with longer QT intervals (-11.5 ms; 99.75% confidence interval [CI]: -13.7 to -9.3) and JT duration, with sex-specific effects. In contrast, higher magnesium was associated with longer QT intervals (7.2 ms; 99.75% CI: 1.3 to 13.1) and JT. Lower potassium was associated with longer QT intervals (-2.8 ms; 99.75% CI: -3.5 to -2.0), JT, QRS, and PR durations, but all potassium associations were driven by use of antihypertensive drugs. No physiologically relevant associations were observed for sodium or RR intervals., Conclusions: The study identified physiologically relevant associations between electrolytes and electrocardiographic intervals in a large-scale analysis combining cohorts from different settings. The results provide insights for further cardiac electrophysiology research and could potentially influence clinical practice, especially the association between calcium and QT duration, by which calcium levels at the bottom 2% of the population distribution led to clinically relevant QT prolongation by >5 ms., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the major causes of death worldwide, and its treatment is a crucial challenge of cardiovascular medicine. An attractive therapeutic strategy is to stimulate endogenous mechanisms of myocardial regeneration., Objectives: This study evaluates the potential therapeutic treatment with annexin A1 (AnxA1) to induce cardiac repair after MI., Methods: AnxA1 knockout (AnxA1 -/- ) and wild-type mice underwent MI induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Cardiac functionality was assessed by longitudinal echocardiographic measurements. Histological, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, dot blot analysis, and in vitro/ex vivo studies were used to assess the myocardial neovascularization, macrophage content, and activity in response to AnxA1., Results: AnxA1 -/- mice showed a reduced cardiac functionality and an expansion of proinflammatory macrophages in the ischemic area. Cardiac macrophages from AnxA1 -/- mice exhibited a dramatically reduced ability to release the proangiogenic mediator vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A. However, AnxA1 treatment enhanced VEGF-A release from cardiac macrophages, and its delivery in vivo markedly improved cardiac performance. The positive effect of AnxA1 treatment on cardiac performance was abolished in wild-type mice transplanted with bone marrow derived from Cx 3 cr1cre ERT2 Vegf flox/flox or in mice depleted of macrophages. Similarly, cardioprotective effects of AnxA1 were obtained in pigs in which full-length AnxA1 was overexpressed by use of a cardiotropic adeno-associated virus., Conclusions: AnxA1 has a direct action on cardiac macrophage polarization toward a pro-angiogenic, reparative phenotype. AnxA1 stimulated cardiac macrophages to release high amounts of VEGF-A, thus inducing neovascularization and cardiac repair., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The taxonomy of cardiovascular (CV) diseases is divided into a broad spectrum of clinical entities. Many such diseases coincide in specific patient groups and suggest shared predisposition., Objectives: This study focused on coronary artery disease (CAD) and investigated the genetic relationship to CV and non-CV diseases with reported CAD comorbidity., Methods: This study examined 425,196 UK Biobank participants to determine a genetic risk score (GRS) based on 300 CAD associated variants (CAD-GRS). This score was associated with 22 traits, including risk factors, diseases secondary to CAD, as well as comorbid and non-CV conditions. Sensitivity analyses were performed in individuals free from CAD or stable angina diagnosis., Results: Hypercholesterolemia (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.29) and hypertension (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.12) were strongly associated with the CAD-GRS, which indicated that the score contained variants predisposing to these conditions. However, the CAD-GRS was also significant in patients with CAD who were free of CAD risk factors (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.44). The study observed significant associations between the CAD-GRS and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.32), abdominal aortic aneurysms (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.37), and stroke (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.10), which remained significant in sensitivity analyses that suggested shared genetic predisposition. The score was also associated with heart failure (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.29), atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.10), and premature death (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.06). These associations were abolished in sensitivity analyses that indicated that they were secondary to prevalent CAD. Finally, an inverse association was observed between the score and migraine headaches (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.96)., Conclusions: A wide spectrum of CV conditions, including premature death, might develop consecutively or in parallel with CAD for the same genetic roots. In conditions like heart failure, the study found evidence that the CAD-GRS could be used to stratify patients with no or limited genetic overlap with CAD risk. Increased genetic predisposition to CAD was inversely associated with migraine headaches., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genetic variants currently known to affect coronary artery disease (CAD) risk explain less than one-quarter of disease heritability. The heritability contribution of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in CAD, which are modulated by both genetic and environmental factors, is unknown., Objectives: This study sought to determine the heritability contributions of single nucleotide polymorphisms affecting gene expression (eSNPs) in GRNs causally linked to CAD., Methods: Seven vascular and metabolic tissues collected in 2 independent genetics-of-gene-expression studies of patients with CAD were used to identify eSNPs and to infer coexpression networks. To construct GRNs with causal relations to CAD, the prior information of eSNPs in the coexpression networks was used in a Bayesian algorithm. Narrow-sense CAD heritability conferred by the GRNs was calculated from individual-level genotype data from 9 European genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (13,612 cases, 13,758 control cases)., Results: The authors identified and replicated 28 independent GRNs active in CAD. The genetic variation in these networks contributed to 10.0% of CAD heritability beyond the 22% attributable to risk loci identified by GWAS. GRNs in the atherosclerotic arterial wall (n = 7) and subcutaneous or visceral abdominal fat (n = 9) were most strongly implicated, jointly explaining 8.2% of CAD heritability. In all, these 28 GRNs (each contributing to >0.2% of CAD heritability) comprised 24 to 841 genes, whereof 1 to 28 genes had strong regulatory effects (key disease drivers) and harbored many relevant functions previously associated with CAD. The gene activity in these 28 GRNs also displayed strong associations with genetic and phenotypic cardiometabolic disease variations both in humans and mice, indicative of their pivotal roles as mediators of gene-environmental interactions in CAD., Conclusions: GRNs capture a major portion of genetic variance and contribute to heritability beyond that of genetic loci currently known to affect CAD risk. These networks provide a framework to identify novel risk genes/pathways and study molecular interactions within and across disease-relevant tissues leading to CAD., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Incremental low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering with the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab regresses coronary atherosclerosis in statin-treated patients., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding evolocumab to statin therapy on coronary plaque composition., Methods: A total of 968 statin-treated coronary artery disease patients underwent serial coronary intravascular ultrasound imaging at baseline and following 76 weeks of treatment with placebo or evolocumab 420 mg monthly. Plaque composition changes were determined in 331 patients with evaluable radiofrequency analysis of the ultrasound backscatter signal., Results: Compared with statin monotherapy, evolocumab further reduced LDL cholesterol (33.5 mg/dl vs. 89.9 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) and induced regression of percent atheroma volume (-1.2% vs. +0.17%; p < 0.0001) and total atheroma volume (-3.6 mm 3 vs. -0.8 mm 3 ; p = 0.04). No difference was observed between the evolocumab and placebo groups in changes in calcium (1.0 ± 0.3 mm 3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 mm 3 ; p = 0.49), fibrous (-3.0 ± 0.6 mm 3 vs. -2.4 ± 0.6 mm 3 ; p = 0.49), fibrofatty (-5.0 ± 1.0 mm 3 vs. -3.0 ± 1.0 mm 3 ; p = 0.49), and necrotic (-0.6 ± 0.5 mm 3 vs. -0.1 ± 0.5 mm 3 ; p = 0.49) volumes. An inverse correlation was observed between changes in LDL cholesterol and plaque calcification (r = -0.15; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The addition of evolocumab to a statin did not produce differential changes in plaque composition compared with statin monotherapy. This suggests that evaluation of plaque morphology using virtual histology imaging may provide no incremental information about the plaque effects of evolocumab beyond measurement of plaque burden. (GLobal Assessment of Plaque reGression With a PCSK9 antibOdy as Measured by intraVascular Ultrasound [GLAGOV]; NCT01813422)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prognosis of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remains controversial due to scarcity of available data. Additionally, the effect of the triggering factors remains elusive., Objectives: This study compared prognosis between TTS and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and investigated short- and long-term outcomes in TTS based on different triggers., Methods: Patients with TTS were enrolled from the International Takotsubo Registry. Long-term mortality of patients with TTS was compared to an age- and sex-matched cohort of patients with ACS. In addition, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between different groups according to triggering conditions., Results: Overall, TTS patients had a comparable long-term mortality risk with ACS patients. Of 1,613 TTS patients, an emotional trigger was detected in 485 patients (30%). Of 630 patients (39%) related to physical triggers, 98 patients (6%) had acute neurologic disorders, while in the other 532 patients (33%), physical activities, medical conditions, or procedures were the triggering conditions. The remaining 498 patients (31%) had no identifiable trigger. TTS patients related to physical stress showed higher mortality rates than ACS patients during long-term follow-up, whereas patients related to emotional stress had better outcomes compared with ACS patients., Conclusions: Overall, TTS patients had long-term outcomes comparable to age- and sex-matched ACS patients. Also, we demonstrated that TTS can either be benign or a life-threating condition depending on the inciting stress factor. We propose a new classification based on triggers, which can serve as a clinical tool to predict short- and long-term outcomes of TTS. (International Takotsubo Registry [InterTAK Registry]; NCT01947621)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inflammation contributes to chronic kidney disease (CKD), in part mediated through activation of interleukin (IL)-1β by the NLRP3 inflammasome within the kidney. This process also likely contributes to the accelerated atherosclerosis associated with nephropathy., Objectives: The authors hypothesized that canakinumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-1β, might reduce cardiovascular event rates and improve renal function among post-myocardial infarction patients with CKD., Methods: Stable post-myocardial infarction patients with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 2mg/l were randomly allocated to placebo or to 1 of 3 doses of canakinumab (50, 150, or 300 mg) given subcutaneously once every 3 months. Participants were followed for incident myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization, cardiovascular death, or death from any cause over a median follow-up period of 3.7 years (maximum 5 years). All patients additionally had serial monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (uACR), and were monitored for adverse renal and urinary events., Results: Of 10,061 participants, 1,875 (18.6%) had baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 . These moderate CKD patients had higher incidence rates for major adverse vascular events compared with those with eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (6.92 vs. 4.13 per 100 person-years; p < 0.0001). Random allocation to canakinumab reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events among those with CKD (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 1.00; p = 0.05) with the largest cardiovascular benefits accruing among those who achieved on-treatment hsCRP levels below 2 mg/l measured after taking the first dose (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.86; p = 0.0015). Comparable effects were observed among those with baseline albuminuria or diabetes. Canakinumab had neither clinically meaningful benefits nor substantive harms with respect to serial measures of eGFR, creatinine, the uACR, or reported adverse renal events during trial follow-up., Conclusions: IL-1β inhibition with canakinumab reduces major adverse cardiovascular event rates among high-risk atherosclerosis patients with CKD, particularly among those with a robust anti-inflammatory response to initial treatment. These cardiovascular benefits accrued with no adverse clinical renal events. (Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study [CANTOS]; NCT01327846)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the ISAR-CABG (Is Drug-Eluting-Stenting Associated with Improved Results in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts?) trial, clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients undergoing treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions were superior with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents., Objectives: The authors compared outcomes between treatment groups at 5 years., Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1:3) to receive DES (either permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents, permanent-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents, or biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents) or bare-metal stents. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were the composite of death or MI and TLR., Results: A total of 610 patients were allocated to treatment with DES (n = 303) or bare-metal stents (n = 307). At 5 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 159 (55.5%) versus 157 (53.6%) patients in the DES and bare-metal stent groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.23; p = 0.89). There was interaction between treatment effect and time (p interaction  = 0.005), with a lower event rate in the DES group at 1 year (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.94; p = 0.02) but a numerically higher rate between 1 and 5 years (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.63; p = 0.13). Death or MI occurred in 93 (32.8%) versus 108 (36.6%) patients, respectively (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.12; p = 0.24), without significant interaction between treatment effect and time (p interaction  = 0.57). TLR occurred in 84 (33.1%) versus 69 (25.5%) patients in the DES and bare-metal stent groups, respectively (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.64; p = 0.27). There was interaction between treatment effect and time (p interaction  <0.001): TLR was significantly lower in the DES group at 1 year (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.86; p = 0.01) but significantly higher thereafter (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.08; p = 0.001)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions, the advantage of DES over bare-metal stents demonstrated at 1 year was lost at 5 years due to higher attrition of efficacy in the DES group. (Efficacy Study of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents in Bypass Graft Lesions [ISAR-CABG]; NCT00611910)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Disrupting the costimulatory CD40-CD40L dyad reduces atherosclerosis, but can result in immune suppression. The authors recently identified small molecule inhibitors that block the interaction between CD40 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 6 (TRAF-STOPs), while leaving CD40-TRAF2/3/5 interactions intact, thereby preserving CD40-mediated immunity., Objectives: This study evaluates the potential of TRAF-STOP treatment in atherosclerosis., Methods: The effects of TRAF-STOPs on atherosclerosis were investigated in apolipoprotein E deficient (Apoe -/- ) mice. Recombinant high-density lipoprotein (rHDL) nanoparticles were used to target TRAF-STOPs to macrophages., Results: TRAF-STOP treatment of young Apoe -/- mice reduced atherosclerosis by reducing CD40 and integrin expression in classical monocytes, thereby hampering monocyte recruitment. When Apoe -/- mice with established atherosclerosis were treated with TRAF-STOPs, plaque progression was halted, and plaques contained an increase in collagen, developed small necrotic cores, and contained only a few immune cells. TRAF-STOP treatment did not impair "classical" immune pathways of CD40, including T-cell proliferation and costimulation, Ig isotype switching, or germinal center formation, but reduced CD40 and β2-integrin expression in inflammatory monocytes. In vitro testing and transcriptional profiling showed that TRAF-STOPs are effective in reducing macrophage migration and activation, which could be attributed to reduced phosphorylation of signaling intermediates of the canonical NF-κB pathway. To target TRAF-STOPs specifically to macrophages, TRAF-STOP 6877002 was incorporated into rHDL nanoparticles. Six weeks of rHDL-6877002 treatment attenuated the initiation of atherosclerosis in Apoe -/- mice., Conclusions: TRAF-STOPs can overcome the current limitations of long-term CD40 inhibition in atherosclerosis and have the potential to become a future therapeutic for atherosclerosis., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Limited data exist about safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation (AR)., Objectives: This study sought to compare the outcomes of TAVR with early- and new-generation devices in symptomatic patients with pure native AR., Methods: From the pure native AR TAVR multicenter registry, procedural and clinical outcomes were assessed according to VARC-2 criteria and compared between early- and new-generation devices., Results: A total of 331 patients with a mean STS score of 6.7 ± 6.7 underwent TAVR. The early- and new-generation devices were used in 119 patients (36.0%) and 212 patients (64.0%), respectively. STS score tended to be lower in the new-generation device group (6.2 ± 6.7 vs. 7.6 ± 6.7; p = 0.08), but transfemoral access was more frequently used in the early-generation device group (87.4% vs. 60.8%; p < 0.001). Compared with the early-generation devices, the new-generation devices were associated with a significantly higher device success rate (81.1% vs. 61.3%; p < 0.001) due to lower rates of second valve implantation (12.7% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.007) and post-procedural AR ≥ moderate (4.2% vs. 18.8%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in major 30-day endpoints between the 2 groups. The cumulative rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death at 1-year follow-up were 24.1% and 15.6%, respectively. The 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the patients with post-procedural AR ≥ moderate compared with those with post-procedural AR ≤ mild (46.1% vs. 21.8%; log-rank p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, post-procedural AR ≥ moderate was independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 5.35; p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Compared with the early-generation devices, TAVR using the new-generation devices was associated with improved procedural outcomes in treating patients with pure native AR. In patients with pure native AR, significant post-procedural AR was independently associated with increased mortality., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recommendations for physical activity in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) are based on modest evidence., Objectives: The authors analyzed the association between self-reported exercise and mortality in patients with stable CHD., Methods: A total of 15,486 patients from 39 countries with stable CHD who participated in the STABILITY (Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy) study completed questions at baseline on hours spent each week taking mild, moderate, and vigorous exercise. Associations between the volume of habitual exercise in metabolic equivalents of task hours/week and adverse outcomes during a median follow-up of 3.7 years were evaluated., Results: A graded decrease in mortality occurred with increased habitual exercise that was steeper at lower compared with higher exercise levels. Doubling exercise volume was associated with lower all-cause mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 0.85; adjusting for covariates, HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.87 to 0.93). These associations were similar for cardiovascular mortality (unadjusted HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.87; adjusted HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.96), but myocardial infarction and stroke were not associated with exercise volume after adjusting for covariates. The association between decrease in mortality and greater physical activity was stronger in the subgroup of patients at higher risk estimated by the ABC-CHD (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical-Coronary Heart Disease) risk score (p for interaction = 0.0007)., Conclusions: In patients with stable CHD, more physical activity was associated with lower mortality. The largest benefits occurred between sedentary patient groups and between those with the highest mortality risk., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data exist regarding transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for patients with failed mitral valve replacement and repair., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of TMVR in patients with failed mitral bioprosthetic valves (valve-in-valve [ViV]) and annuloplasty rings (valve-in-ring [ViR])., Methods: From the TMVR multicenter registry, procedural and clinical outcomes of mitral ViV and ViR were compared according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria., Results: A total of 248 patients with mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.9 ± 6.8% underwent TMVR. Transseptal access and the balloon-expandable valve were used in 33.1% and 89.9%, respectively. Compared with 176 patients undergoing ViV, 72 patients undergoing ViR had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45.6 ± 17.4% vs. 55.3 ± 11.1%; p < 0.001). Overall technical and device success rates were acceptable, at 92.3% and 85.5%, respectively. However, compared with the ViV group, the ViR group had lower technical success (83.3% vs. 96.0%; p = 0.001) due to more frequent second valve implantation (11.1% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.008), and lower device success (76.4% vs. 89.2%; p = 0.009) due to more frequent reintervention (16.7% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.03). Mean mitral valve gradients were similar between groups (6.4 ± 2.3 mm Hg vs. 5.8 ± 2.7 mm Hg; p = 0.17), whereas the ViR group had more frequent post-procedural mitral regurgitation moderate or higher (19.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.003). Furthermore, the ViR group had more frequent life-threatening bleeding (8.3% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.03), acute kidney injury (11.1% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.03), and subsequent lower procedural success (58.3% vs. 79.5%; p = 0.001). The 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ViR group compared with the ViV group (28.7% vs. 12.6%; log-rank test, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, failed annuloplasty ring was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 5.43; p = 0.005)., Conclusions: The TMVR procedure provided acceptable outcomes in high-risk patients with degenerated bioprostheses or failed annuloplasty rings, but mitral ViR was associated with higher rates of procedural complications and mid-term mortality compared with mitral ViV., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Currently, there is no generally accepted model to predict outcomes in stable coronary heart disease (CHD)., Objectives: This study evaluated and compared the prognostic value of biomarkers and clinical variables to develop a biomarker-based prediction model in patients with stable CHD., Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial cohort of 13,164 patients with stable CHD, we analyzed several candidate biomarkers and clinical variables and used multivariable Cox regression to develop a clinical prediction model based on the most important markers. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, but model performance was also explored for other key outcomes. It was internally bootstrap validated, and externally validated in 1,547 patients in another study., Results: During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, there were 591 cases of CV death. The 3 most important biomarkers were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, where NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT had greater prognostic value than any other biomarker or clinical variable. The final prediction model included age (A), biomarkers (B) (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and clinical variables (C) (smoking, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral arterial disease). This "ABC-CHD" model had high discriminatory ability for CV death (c-index 0.81 in derivation cohort, 0.78 in validation cohort), with adequate calibration in both cohorts., Conclusions: This model provided a robust tool for the prediction of CV death in patients with stable CHD. As it is based on a small number of readily available biomarkers and clinical factors, it can be widely employed to complement clinical assessment and guide management based on CV risk. (The Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy Trial [STABILITY]; NCT00799903)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Familial combined hypolipidemia, a Mendelian condition characterized by substantial reductions in all 3 major lipid fractions, is caused by mutations that inactivate the gene angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3). Whether ANGPTL3 deficiency reduces risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown., Objectives: The study goal was to leverage 3 distinct lines of evidence-a family that included individuals with complete (compound heterozygote) ANGPTL3 deficiency, a population based-study of humans with partial (heterozygote) ANGPTL3 deficiency, and biomarker levels in patients with myocardial infarction (MI)-to test whether ANGPTL3 deficiency is associated with lower risk for CAD., Methods: We assessed coronary atherosclerotic burden in 3 individuals with complete ANGPTL3 deficiency and 3 wild-type first-degree relatives using computed tomography angiography. In the population, ANGPTL3 loss-of-function (LOF) mutations were ascertained in up to 21,980 people with CAD and 158,200 control subjects. LOF mutations were defined as nonsense, frameshift, and splice-site variants, along with missense variants resulting in <25% of wild-type ANGPTL3 activity in a mouse model. In a biomarker study, circulating ANGPTL3 concentration was measured in 1,493 people who presented with MI and 3,232 control subjects., Results: The 3 individuals with complete ANGPTL3 deficiency showed no evidence of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. ANGPTL3 gene sequencing demonstrated that approximately 1 in 309 people was a heterozygous carrier for an LOF mutation. Compared with those without mutation, heterozygous carriers of ANGPTL3 LOF mutations demonstrated a 17% reduction in circulating triglycerides and a 12% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Carrier status was associated with a 34% reduction in odds of CAD (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.44 to 0.98; p = 0.04). Individuals in the lowest tertile of circulating ANGPTL3 concentrations, compared with the highest, had reduced odds of MI (adjusted odds ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 0.77; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: ANGPTL3 deficiency is associated with protection from CAD., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have suggested that prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may be associated with increased mortality, the mechanistic underpinnings of this association remain unclear., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the associations among bleeding, mortality, and DAPT duration after drug-eluting stent implantation in a meta-analysis of RCTs., Methods: RCTs comparing different DAPT durations after drug-eluting stent placement were sought through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the proceedings of international meetings. Deaths were considered possibly bleeding related if occurring within 1 year of the episodes of bleeding. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat. Secondary analysis was performed in a modified intention-to-treat population in which events occurring when all patients were on DAPT were excluded., Results: Individual patient data were obtained for 6 RCTs, and aggregate data were available for 12 RCTs. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher rates of mortality compared with those without, and in a time-adjusted multivariate analysis, bleeding was an independent predictor of mortality occurring within 1 year of the bleeding episode (hazard ratio: 6.93; 95% confidence interval: 4.53 to 10.60; p < 0.0001). Shorter DAPT was associated with lower rates of all-cause death compared with longer DAPT (hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.00; p = 0.05), which was driven by lower rates of bleeding-related deaths with shorter DAPT compared with prolonged DAPT (hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.43 to 0.99; p = 0.04). Mortality unrelated to bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups. Similar results were apparent in the modified intention-to-treat population., Conclusions: Bleeding was strongly associated with the occurrence of mortality within 1 year after the bleeding event. Shorter compared with longer DAPT was associated with lower risk for bleeding-related death, a finding that may underlie the lower all-cause mortality with shorter DAPT in the RCTs of different DAPT durations after DES., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The long-term effect of thrombolytic treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) is unknown., Objectives: This study investigated the long-term prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk PE and the effect of thrombolytic treatment on the persistence of symptoms or the development of late complications., Methods: The PEITHO (Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis) trial was a randomized (1:1) comparison of thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus placebo in normotensive patients with acute PE, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on imaging, and a positive cardiac troponin test result. Both treatment arms received standard anticoagulation. Long-term follow-up was included in the third protocol amendment; 28 sites randomizing 709 of the 1,006 patients participated., Results: Long-term (median 37.8 months) survival was assessed in 353 of 359 (98.3%) patients in the thrombolysis arm and in 343 of 350 (98.0%) in the placebo arm. Overall mortality rates were 20.3% and 18.0%, respectively (p = 0.43). Between day 30 and long-term follow-up, 65 deaths occurred in the thrombolysis arm and 53 occurred in the placebo arm. At follow-up examination of survivors, persistent dyspnea (mostly mild) or functional limitation was reported by 36.0% versus 30.1% of the patients (p = 0.23). Echocardiography (performed in 144 and 146 patients randomized to thrombolysis and placebo, respectively) did not reveal significant differences in residual pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) was confirmed in 4 (2.1%) versus 6 (3.2%) cases (p = 0.79)., Conclusions: Approximately 33% of patients report some degree of persistent functional limitation after intermediate-risk PE, but CTEPH is infrequent. Thrombolytic treatment did not affect long-term mortality rates, and it did not appear to reduce residual dyspnea or RV dysfunction in these patients. (Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis study [PEITHO]; NCT00639743)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genome-wide association studies have so far identified 56 loci associated with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Many CAD loci show pleiotropy; that is, they are also associated with other diseases or traits., Objectives: This study sought to systematically test if genetic variants identified for non-CAD diseases/traits also associate with CAD and to undertake a comprehensive analysis of the extent of pleiotropy of all CAD loci., Methods: In discovery analyses involving 42,335 CAD cases and 78,240 control subjects we tested the association of 29,383 common (minor allele frequency >5%) single nucleotide polymorphisms available on the exome array, which included a substantial proportion of known or suspected single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with common diseases or traits as of 2011. Suggestive association signals were replicated in an additional 30,533 cases and 42,530 control subjects. To evaluate pleiotropy, we tested CAD loci for association with cardiovascular risk factors (lipid traits, blood pressure phenotypes, body mass index, diabetes, and smoking behavior), as well as with other diseases/traits through interrogation of currently available genome-wide association study catalogs., Results: We identified 6 new loci associated with CAD at genome-wide significance: on 2q37 (KCNJ13-GIGYF2), 6p21 (C2), 11p15 (MRVI1-CTR9), 12q13 (LRP1), 12q24 (SCARB1), and 16q13 (CETP). Risk allele frequencies ranged from 0.15 to 0.86, and odds ratio per copy of the risk allele ranged from 1.04 to 1.09. Of 62 new and known CAD loci, 24 (38.7%) showed statistical association with a traditional cardiovascular risk factor, with some showing multiple associations, and 29 (47%) showed associations at p < 1 × 10 -4 with a range of other diseases/traits., Conclusions: We identified 6 loci associated with CAD at genome-wide significance. Several CAD loci show substantial pleiotropy, which may help us understand the mechanisms by which these loci affect CAD risk., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetes mellitus causes microcirculatory rarefaction and may impair the responsiveness of ischemic myocardium to proangiogenic factors., Objectives: This study sought to determine whether microvascular destabilization affects organ function and therapeutic neovascularization in diabetes mellitus., Methods: The authors obtained myocardial samples from patients with end-stage heart failure at time of transplant, with or without diabetes mellitus. Diabetic (db) and wild-type (wt) pigs were used to analyze myocardial vascularization and function. Chronic ischemia was induced percutaneously (day 0) in the circumflex artery. At day 28, recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) (5 × 10 12 viral particles encoding vascular endothelial growth factor-A [VEGF-A] or thymosin beta 4 [Tβ4]) was applied regionally. CD31+ capillaries per high power field (c/hpf) and NG2+ pericyte coverage were analyzed. Global myocardial function (ejection fraction [EF] and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) was assessed at days 28 and 56., Results: Diabetic human myocardial explants revealed capillary rarefaction and pericyte loss compared to nondiabetic explants. Hyperglycemia in db pigs, even without ischemia, induced capillary rarefaction in the myocardium (163 ± 14 c/hpf in db vs. 234 ± 8 c/hpf in wt hearts; p < 0.005), concomitant with a distinct loss of EF (44.9% vs. 53.4% in nondiabetic controls; p < 0.05). Capillary density further decreased in chronic ischemic hearts, as did EF (both p < 0.05). Treatment with rAAV.Tβ4 enhanced capillary density and maturation in db hearts less efficiently than in wt hearts, similar to collateral growth. rAAV.VEGF-A, though stimulating angiogenesis, induced neither pericyte recruitment nor collateral growth. As a result, rAAV.Tβ4 but not rAAV.VEGF-A improved EF in db hearts (34.5 ± 1.4%), but less so than in wt hearts (44.8 ± 1.5%)., Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus destabilized microvascular vessels of the heart, affecting the amplitude of therapeutic neovascularization via rAAV.Tβ4 in a translational large animal model of hibernating myocardium., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Genomic analyses have suggested that the LPA gene and its associated plasma biomarker, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), represent a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). As such, lowering Lp(a) levels has emerged as a therapeutic strategy. Beyond target identification, human genetics may contribute to the development of new therapies by defining the full spectrum of beneficial and adverse consequences and by developing a dose-response curve of target perturbation., Objectives: The goal of this study was to establish the full phenotypic impact of LPA gene variation and to estimate a dose-response curve between genetically altered plasma Lp(a) and risk for CHD., Methods: We leveraged genetic variants at the LPA gene from 3 data sources: individual-level data from 112,338 participants in the U.K. Biobank; summary association results from large-scale genome-wide association studies; and LPA gene sequencing results from case subjects with CHD and control subjects free of CHD., Results: One SD genetically lowered Lp(a) level was associated with a 29% lower risk of CHD (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 0.73), a 31% lower risk of peripheral vascular disease (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.80), a 13% lower risk of stroke (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.96), a 17% lower risk of heart failure (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94), and a 37% lower risk of aortic stenosis (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.83). We observed no association with 31 other disorders, including type 2 diabetes and cancer. Variants that led to gain of LPA gene function increased the risk for CHD, whereas those that led to loss of gene function reduced the CHD risk., Conclusions: Beyond CHD, genetically lowered Lp(a) levels are associated with a lower risk of peripheral vascular disease, stroke, heart failure, and aortic stenosis. As such, pharmacological lowering of plasma Lp(a) may influence a range of atherosclerosis-related diseases., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic value of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) elevation after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without raised baseline hs-TnT levels is unclear., Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess whether the prognostic value of post-procedural hs-TnT level after elective PCI depends on the baseline hs-TnT level., Methods: This study included 5,626 patients undergoing elective PCI who had baseline and peak post-procedural hs-TnT measurements available. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality (with risk estimates calculated per SD increase of the log hs-TnT scale)., Results: Patients were divided into 4 groups: nonelevated baseline and post-procedural hs-TnT levels (hs-TnT ≤0.014 μg/l; n = 742); nonelevated baseline but elevated post-procedural hs-TnT levels (peak post-procedural hs-TnT >0.014 μg/l; n = 2,721); elevated baseline hs-TnT levels (hs-TnT >0.014 μg/l) with no further rise post-procedure (n = 516); and elevated baseline hs-TnT levels with a further rise post-procedure (n = 1,647). A total of 265 deaths occurred: 6 (1.6%) in patients with nonelevated baseline and post-procedural hs-TnT levels; 54 (3.8%) in patients with nonelevated baseline but elevated post-procedural hs-TnT levels; 50 (16.0%) in patients with elevated baseline hs-TnT levels with no further rise post-procedure; and 155 (18.2%) in patients with elevated baseline hs-TnT levels with a further rise post-procedure (p < 0.001). After adjustment, baseline hs-TnT levels (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.38; p < 0.001) but not peak post-procedural hs-TnT levels (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.28; p = 0.679) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Peak post-procedural hs-TnT findings were not associated with mortality in patients with nonelevated (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.25; p = 0.653) or elevated (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.69; p = 0.165) baseline hs-TnT levels., Conclusions: In patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI, an increase in post-procedural hs-TnT level did not offer prognostic information beyond that provided by the baseline level of the biomarker., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)