Search

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein (PV) isolation/ablation is an efficacious treatment of paroxysmal and early persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), including in patients with left common (LC) PV anatomy. The efficacy of cryoballoon ablation is unknown in patients with right middle or accessory (RMA) PVs.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Background Optimal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy is essential for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications during and after AF ablation. The safety and efficacy of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown. Methods We performed a multicenter, observational, prospective study of a registry of patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 centers in North America. Patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural rivaroxaban were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients taking uninterrupted warfarin therapy who were undergoing AF ablation during the same period. Results A total of 642 patients were included in the study, with 321 in each group. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years, with 442 (69%) males and 328 (51%) patients with paroxysmal AF equally distributed between the 2 groups. Patients in the warfarin group had a slightly higher mean HAS- BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score (1.70 ± 1.0 vs. 1.47 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.032). Bleeding and embolic complications occurred in 47 (7.3%) and 2 (0.3%) patients (both had transient ischemic attacks) respectively. There were no differences in the number of major bleeding complications (5 [1.6%] vs. 7 [1.9%], respectively; p = 0.772), minor bleeding complications (16 [5.0%] vs. 19 [5.9%], respectively; p = 0.602), or embolic complications (1 [0.3%] vs. 1 [0.3%], respectively; p = 1.0) between the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups in the first 30 days. Conclusions Uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy appears to be as safe and efficacious in preventing bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing AF ablation as uninterrupted warfarin therapy.

Patients presenting with frequent ventricular arrhythmias can have underlying myocardial inflammation as an inciting factor. We seek to determine whether the site of origin (SOO) of ventricular arrhythmias on 12 lead EKG correlate with areas of inflammation on FDG PET cardiac imaging in patients

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently have arrhythmias warranting catheter ablation (CA). The risk of lead dislodgement with CA in patients with CIED implant within 1 year is uncertain. We retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing CA of arrhythmias at an

Background: Very recently St Jude Medical (SJM) released an advisory regarding premature battery depletion in a family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) including biventricular cardiac defibrillators (CRTDs). There have been reported cases of loss of pacing and inability to

To evaluate the real-world practice patterns of utilization of dofetilide for treating Atrial Fibrillation (AF). We performed an online survey of cardiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists in US and Europe. Participation was voluntary. 31 specific questions were included in the study, primarily

To evaluate the impact of pre-procedural oral prednisone on inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, Interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-8) levels and outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. A total of 60 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing AF ablation were randomized (

We intended to evaluate the incidence of electrical and mechanical failure of QuickSite (QS) and QuickFlex (QF) left ventricular (LV) leads which are a part of a lead advisory. We invited all 154 alive patients who had the QS and QF leads implanted at our center to participate in this prospective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of periprocedural dabigatran during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.AF ablation requires optimal periprocedural anticoagulation for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications. The safety and efficacy of dabigatran as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown.We performed a multicenter, observational study from a prospective registry including all consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 high-volume centers in the United States. All patients receiving dabigatran therapy who underwent AF ablation on periprocedural dabigatran, with the dose held on the morning of the procedure, were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted warfarin therapy over the same period.A total of 290 patients, including 145 taking periprocedural dabigatran and an equal number of matched patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural warfarin, were included in the study. The mean age was 60 years with 79% being male and 57% having paroxysmal AF. Both groups had a similar CHADS(2) score, left atrial size, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Three thromboembolic complications (2.1%) occurred in the dabigatran group compared with none in the warfarin group (p = 0.25). The dabigatran group had a significantly higher major bleeding rate (6% vs. 1%; p = 0.019), total bleeding rate (14% vs. 6%; p = 0.031), and composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (16% vs. 6%; p = 0.009) compared with the warfarin group. Dabigatran use was confirmed as an independent predictor of bleeding or thromboembolic complications (odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 6.25; p = 0.01) on multivariate regression analysis.In patients undergoing AF ablation, periprocedural dabigatran use significantly increases the risk of bleeding or thromboembolic complications compared with uninterrupted warfarin therapy.