1. Comparison of one-day and three-day calorie counts in hospitalized patients: a pilot study
- Author
-
John D. Sorkin and RD Rosalind A. Breslow PhD
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Calorie ,Time Factors ,Hospitalized patients ,Nutritional Status ,Pilot Projects ,Protein-Energy Malnutrition ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Caloria ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Prospective Studies ,Serum Albumin ,Aged ,Geriatrics ,Aged, 80 and over ,Inpatients ,biology ,Anthropometry ,business.industry ,Medical record ,Body Weight ,Nutritional Requirements ,Reproducibility of Results ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Surgery ,Malnutrition ,Cholesterol ,Nutrition Assessment ,Female ,Dietary Proteins ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,Energy Intake - Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a 1-day calorie count can replace the labor-intensive 3-day calorie count commonly performed in hospitalized patients when estimates of caloric and protein intake are required. Design: Pilot study using prospective, non-concurrent review of medical records. Setting: Hospital. Participants: Thirty patients (mean age 67 years). Results: Mean 3-day intake (952 ± 91 calories, 41 ± 4 g protein) was about half of calculated requirements; first-day intake was similar (918 ± 116 calories, 40 ± 5 g protein). The first day had high sensitivity (calories 96%; protein 93%) and positive predictive value (calories 100%; protein 96%). Malnutrition was evident; three-fourths of patients had weights below recommended ranges, and 83% were hypoalbuminemic. Conclusions: Three-day calorie counts are frequently performed in patients suspected of eating poorly. Results of this pilot study suggest that 1-day calorie counts may be a valid alternative. However, readily available anthropometric and biochemical data may be as good an indicator of inadequate dietary intake.
- Published
- 1993