Search

Background Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and coexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) have greater PAD progression and adverse limb events. Our aim was to study whether PAD‐specific health status differs by DM. Methods and Results The PORTRAIT (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) trial is a 16‐center international registry that includes patients with recent exacerbations or new‐onset symptomatic PAD presenting to specialty clinics. We assessed PAD‐specific health status initially and at 3, 6, and 12 months (Peripheral Artery Questionnaire [PAQ]). We used hierarchical, multivariable, linear regression, and repeated measures analyses to study the association between DM and baseline health status initially and over 3 to 12 months. Models were adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic factors, PAD severity, comorbidities, and psychosocial characteristics. The interaction of DM with PAD revascularization on 3‐ to 12‐month health status was also tested. Of 1204 patients, 398 (33%) had DM (94% type 2). Patients with versus those without DM had lower unadjusted PAQ summary scores at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months (46.1 versus 50.8, 63.6 versus 68.2, 65.7 versus 71.7, and 65.4 versus 72.6; P ≤0.01). In fully adjusted models, the effect of DM on baseline (mean difference, −0.65; 95% CI, −2.86 to 1.56 [ P =0.56]) and over 3‐ to 12‐month PAQ summary scores (mean difference, −1.59; 95% CI, −4.06 to 0.88 [ P =0.21]) was no longer significant. Twelve‐month health status gains following revascularization were similar in both groups ( P =0.69). Conclusions Patients with PAD with coexisting DM have poorer health status, mostly explained by the differences in their psychosocial and other comorbidity burden. Patients with PAD and DM versus those without DM experience similar health status benefits following PAD revascularization.

Background The association of depressive symptoms with health status in peripheral artery disease (PAD) is understudied. No reports of differential impact on women have been described. Methods and Results The PORTRAIT (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Artery Disease Investigating Trajectories) registry enrolled 1243 patients from vascular specialty clinics with new or worsening PAD symptoms. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and 3 months using the 8‐Item Patient Health Questionnaire (score ≥10 indicating clinically relevant depressive symptoms). Disease‐specific and generic health status were measured by Peripheral Artery Questionnaire and EQ‐5D Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. An adjusted general linear model for repeated measures was constructed for baseline and 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month health status outcomes by depressive symptoms at baseline. Differences by sex were tested with interaction effects. The mean age was 67.6±9.4 years with 38% (n=470) women. More women than men (21.1% versus 12.9%; P P Conclusions Women with PAD have a high burden of depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were associated with a strikingly worse disease‐specific health status recovery path over the year following PAD diagnosis in men and women. Developing and testing interventions to address depressive symptoms in PAD are urgently needed. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01419080.

Background Effective management of cardiovascular risk factors is the foundation of secondary prevention in coronary artery disease. The physician under whose sphere these are managed can vary, primary care physicians, cardiologists, or both, and the optimal management strategy for risk factor control is unknown. Methods and Results The APPEAR (Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief) study was a cross‐sectional cohort study of outpatients with coronary artery disease (stable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction) from 25 US cardiology practices. After each patient visit, providers noted who managed each risk factor. Blood pressure and lipid levels were recorded from charts. We compared adherence to guideline‐directed risk factor control between management strategies (primary care physician alone, cardiologist alone, or comanaged). Among 1259 outpatients with coronary artery disease (mean [ SD ] age, 71 [11.1] years; 69% men), blood pressure and lipid management strategy varied. Mean blood pressure was 127.9/72.3 mm Hg, with 74% of patients at Conclusions Although comanagement has shown benefit in some clinical situations, we found that risk factor control in patients with coronary artery disease tended to be poorer when care was shared between cardiologists and primary care physicians. Further research is needed to better define which conditions are best comanaged and how to more effectively comanage patients in the fractured US healthcare system.

Background Underuse of guideline‐recommended therapy in peripheral artery disease ( PAD ) in administrative and procedural databases has been described, but reports on medically managed patients and referral to supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) in PAD are lacking. We aimed to document the use of PAD guideline‐recommended therapy, including SET in patients with PAD symptoms consulting a specialty clinic across 3 countries. Methods and Results The 16‐center PORTRAIT (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry enrolled 1275 patients with new or an exacerbation of PAD symptoms (2011–2015). We prospectively documented antiplatelet medications, statins, smoking cessation counseling and/or therapy, and referral to SET : “2 quality measures” referred to the use of both statin and antiplatelet medications; “4 quality measures” to receiving all 4 measures. Median odds ratios were calculated to quantify treatment variation across sites. A total of 89% patients were on antiplatelets, 83% on statins, and 23% had been referred to SET . Of 455 current smokers, 342 (72%) patients received smoking cessation therapy/counseling. Overall, 77.2% of patients received “2 quality measures” and 19.7% “4 quality measures.” The median odds ratio for 2 quality measures was 2.13 (95% CI , 1.61–3.56; P CI , 2.84–17.91; P SET . The odds for SET referral in The Netherlands (70% referral rate) was nearly 100 times greater than in US sites (2% referral rate). Conclusions Not all patients who have undergone a PAD workup at a specialty care facility are treated with evidence‐based care, especially so for SET .

Background Despite guideline recommendations, a significant number of patients with non– ST elevation myocardial infarction ( NSTEMI ) do not receive dual antiplatelet therapy ( DAPT ) before angiography “pretreatment.” While there may be valid clinical reasons to not pretreat, such as concern for bleeding or multivessel disease warranting coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the degree of variability and factors associated with DAPT pretreatment are unknown. Methods and Results From the multicenter TRIUMPH registry, 1632 NSTEMI patients were not taking DAPT on admission and were included in the study cohort. Among the study patients, only 22% patients received DAPT pretreatment. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that race other than white or black (odds ratio [ OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.21–0.83), hemoglobin level ( OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08–1.29), patients’ bleeding risk (assessed with NCDR Cath PCI Bleeding Risk Score) ( OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.99), and severe left ventricular dysfunction ( OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.13–0.65) were the main predictors of pretreatment with DAPT , whereas likelihood of needing coronary artery bypass graft surgery ( GRACE prediction model) was not ( OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35). Median ORs were calculated to assess variability of receiving DAPT pretreatment across sites after adjustment for patient characteristics. Receiving DAPT pretreatment varied substantially across sites (range 0–100%, mean OR 3.94, P Conclusions While deviating from guideline‐recommended DAPT pretreatment in patients with NSTEMI was associated with patient factors (eg, bleeding risk), marked variation was present across sites after accounting for patient‐level characteristics. This suggests that site‐level interventions are needed to improve concordance with current guidelines.

Background Little is known about recovery of female sexual function following an acute myocardial infarction ( MI ). Interventions to improve sexual outcomes in women are limited. Methods and Results Semistructured, qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 17 partnered women (aged 43 to 75 years) purposively selected from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients’ Health Status Registry to deepen knowledge of recovery of female sexual function following an acute myocardial infarction ( MI ) and to improve sexual outcomes in women. Sixteen women had a monogamous relationship with a male spouse; 1 had a long‐term female partner. Most women resumed sexual activity within 4 weeks of their MI . Sexual problems and concerns were prevalent, including patient and/or partner fear of “causing another heart attack.” Few women received counseling about sexual concerns or the safety of returning to sex. Most women who discussed sex with a physician initiated the discussion themselves. Inquiry about strategies to improve sexual outcomes elicited key themes: need for privacy, patient‐centeredness, and information about the timing and safe resumption of sexual activity. In addition, respondents felt that counseling should be initiated by the treating cardiologist, who “knows whether your heart is safe,” and then reinforced by the care team throughout the rehabilitation period. Conclusions Partnered women commonly resume sexual activity soon after an MI with fear but without directed counseling from their physicians. Proactive attention to women's concerns related to sexual function and the safety of sexual activity following an MI could improve post‐ MI outcomes for women and their partners.