Search

The impact of variation within genes responsible for the disposition and metabolism of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation is not well understood. Furthermore, the potential influence of donor, rather than recipient, genotypes on clinical endpoints is unknown. Here, we investigated the associations between donor and recipient gene variants with outcome among 4471 white, CNI-treated kidney transplant recipients. We tested for 52 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across five genes: CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1; encoding P-glycoprotein), NR1I2 (encoding the pregnane X receptor), and PPIA (encoding cyclophilin). In a discovery cohort of 811 patients from Birmingham, United Kingdom, kidney donor CC genotype at C3435T (rs1045642) within ABCB1, a variant known to alter protein expression, was associated with an increased risk for long-term graft failure compared with non-CC genotype (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.40; P=0.003). No other donor or recipient SNPs were associated with graft survival or mortality. We validated this association in 675 donors from Belfast, United Kingdom (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.21-2.32; P=0.002), and in 2985 donors from the Collaborative Transplant Study (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.08-3.13; P=0.006). In conclusion, these data suggest that an ABCB1 variant known to alter protein expression represents an attractive candidate for future study and risk stratification in kidney transplantation.

Gene copy number of complement component C4, which varies among individuals, may determine the intrinsic strength of the classical complement pathway. Presuming a major role of complement as an effector in transplant rejection, we hypothesized that C4 genetic diversity may partially explain the variation in allograft outcomes. This retrospective study included 1969 deceased-donor kidney transplants randomly selected from the Collaborative Transplant Study DNA bank. We determined recipient and donor gene copy number of total C4, C4 isotypes (C4A and C4B), and C4 gene length variants (C4L and C4S) by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Groups defined according to recipient C4 gene copy number (low, intermediate, and high) had similar 10-year allograft survival. Genotypic groups showed comparable rates of graft dysfunction, treatment for rejection, immunological graft loss, hospitalization for infection, malignant disease, and death. Similarly, separate analyses of C4A, C4B, C4L, and C4S; combined evaluation of donor and recipient C4 genotype; or analysis of recipients with higher risk for rejection did not reveal considerable outcome effects. In conclusion, we did not demonstrate that C4 gene copy number associates with transplant outcome, and we found no evidence that the resulting variation in the strength of classical complement activation influences susceptibility to rejection.

It is a matter of debate whether pancreas allografts independently contribute to renal allograft and patient survival in individuals who have type 1 diabetes and receive a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK). Using data from the Collaborative Transplant Study, we studied patients who had type 1 diabetes and were recipients of deceased-donor kidneys (DDK), living-donor kidneys (LDK), or SPK. We analyzed graft and patient survival rates with a maximum of 18 yr of follow-up. DDK recipients had inferior graft and patient survival compared with LDK and SPK recipients. LDK recipients had superior graft and patient survival rates initially, but SPK recipients demonstrated equal survival rates toward the end of follow-up. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for pretransplantation cardiovascular risk, showed that patient survival of SPK recipients was superior to that of LDK recipients beyond the 10th year after transplantation (hazard ratio 0.55; P = 0.005). In summary, the early survival advantage of LDK over SPK is lost during long-term follow-up, probably as a result of improved glycemic control in SPK recipients.

It was reported recently that treatment of kidney transplant recipients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) is associated with strikingly improved long-term graft and patient survival. This finding has important implications for future posttransplantation therapy recommendations. In an analysis of 17,209 kidney and 1744 heart transplant recipients, an association of treatment with ACEI/ARB with improved transplant outcome could not be confirmed. It is concluded that recommendations for a widespread use of ACEI/ARB treatment in transplant recipients are unwarranted.

Differences in actuarial graft survival according to donor gender have been reported for renal allografts and for cardiac and hepatic allografts, but for the latter in small series with limited biostatistical power. Using the large database of the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS), this study is an evaluation of graft survival according to donor and recipient gender for renal (n = 124,911), cardiac (n = 25,432), and hepatic (n = 16,410) transplants. Confounders, such as calendar year, geographical area, race, donor and recipient age, HLA mismatch, cold ischemia time, and others, as well as interaction terms were taken into consideration. Death-censored actuarial renal allograft survival from female compared with male donors was less in female recipients and even more so in male recipients. The donor gender-associated risk ratio for graft loss was 1.15 in female recipients and 1.22 in male recipients. The age-gender interaction term was statistically significant, the gender effect being more pronounced for younger (16 to 45 yr) compared with older (>45 yr) donors. Serum creatinine concentrations 1 yr after transplantation were also higher for recipients with kidney grafts coming from female donors irrespective of recipient gender. For first cardiac transplants, graft survival was inferior when the donor was female and the recipient male, but no statistical difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For first hepatic transplants overall, no significant differences according to donor gender were noted. The proportion of recipients who had treatment for rejection crisis during the first year was higher for male recipients of kidneys from female donors compared with male donors. No difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For cardiac and hepatic grafts, no significant effect of donor gender on the proportion of patients treated for rejection episodes was noted. The data show that adverse effects of female donor gender for different organs is much less uniform than reported in the past. An important confounder is donor age. A gender effect on graft survival is also observed for cardiac allografts. Therefore, in addition to potential "nephron underdosing," further pathomechanisms must play a role, possibly differences in immunogenicity according to donor gender.

The identification of high immunologic responders is desirable for the selection of appropriate immunosuppressive regimens. With the collaboration of 29 transplant centers in 15 countries, we investigated whether the pretransplant serum content of soluble CD30 (sCD30), a marker for the activation state of Th2-type cytokine producing T cells, is a useful predictor of kidney graft outcome. Pretransplant sera of 3899 cadaver kidney recipients were tested for serum sCD30 concentration using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Subsequent kidney graft survival was analyzed. The 5-yr graft survival rate in 901 recipients with a high pretransplant serum sCD30 (> or =100 U/ml) was 64 +/- 2%, significantly lower than the 75 +/- 1% rate in 2998 recipients with low sCD30 (<100 U/ml) (P < 0.0001). High sCD30 was associated primarily with graft loss and not with patient death. The sCD30 effect on graft survival was evident in first transplants as well as in retransplants, in presensitized patients with lymphocytotoxic antibodies as well as in nonsensitized patients, and in patients who received HLA well-matched kidneys as well as in patients who received poorly matched grafts. Recipients with a high pretransplant sCD30 needed significantly more rejection treatment after the first posttransplant year and continued to lose grafts at a higher rate during the 5-yr follow-up period, indicating that pretransplant sCD30 predicts not only the risk of acute rejection but also of chronic allograft nephropathy.