Search

Background: The prognosis of unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas is very poor. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab alone or in association with radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: This was a monocentre retrospective study of all consecutive patients having received at least two courses of panitumumab, alone or in association with radiotherapy, between 2016 and 2019. The primary endpoint was the rate of best overall response, evaluated according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary endpoints were the response and disease control rates at 6 weeks and 6 months, progression‐free survival, overall survival and safety. Results: A total of 25 patients were included; their median age was 86 years, and 17 (86%) had a WHO performance status over 2. The best overall response rate was 52%, including four complete responses (16%) and nine partial responses (36%). All patients with complete response and five out of nine patients with partial response had received concurrent radiotherapy, in most cases in moderate to low doses (<40 Gray, 67%). The response rates at 6 weeks and 6 months were 12% and 28%, respectively. The control rates at 6 weeks and 6 months were 84% and 32%, respectively. Median progression‐free survival was 6.9 months, and median overall survival was 10.5 months. Grade 3 side‐effects, mostly dermatological, occurred in 16 patients (64%). Conclusion: These results suggest that panitumumab remains pertinent in the treatment of unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, in particular in association with radiotherapy, despite recent advances with anti‐PD‐1 antibodies. It presents several advantages: it can be used in very elderly or feeble patients, it does not provoke anaphylactic or other irreversible or life‐threatening side‐effects, and our study observed some long‐term responses. Further prospective investigation of anti‐EGFR antibodies, in association with anti‐PD‐1 antibodies and/or chemotherapy, should be conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) are rare variants of psoriasis. Knowledge of the efficacy of biologics is scarce. Objectives: To evaluate the real‐life efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blockers and ustekinumab in PPP and in ACH. Methods: A multicentre retrospective descriptive study was conducted in 19 dermatology departments, including all patients with PPP or ACH seen from 2014 to 2016 who received one of the studied biologics. The data were collected by a standardized document. Factors associated with complete clearance (CC) were analysed by multivariate analysis, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 92 patients included, 50 received adalimumab, 44 ustekinumab, 36 etanercept and 31 infliximab. Improvement and CC were observed in 83.9% and 20.0% patients receiving infliximab, 75.0% and 38.6% ustekinumab, 57.1% and 20.0% etanercept and 60.4% and 29.2% adalimumab. We found no significant difference in CC rates or duration of treatment among the biological treatments (P = 0.18 and P = 0.10, respectively). On multivariate analysis, CC with etanercept was associated with the ACH form and not smoking [OR = 9.5 (95% CI 1.1–82.7), P = 0.04 and 0.1 (0.01–0.9), P = 0.04]; with ustekinumab, male sex and absence of obesity [6.0 (1.3–28.6), P = 0.02 and 4.7 (1.0–22.7), P = 0.05]; with adalimumab, the ACH form [11.9 (2.7–52.3), P = 0.001]; and with infliximab, obesity [5.6 (1.1–29.4), P = 0.04]. Conclusions: We found no difference in efficacy between TNF blockers and ustekinumab and among the three different TNF blockers in real life for PPP or ACH, which reveals the heterogeneity of clinical response to biologics in pustular psoriasis as compared with plaque psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]