Search

Background/purpose: The efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccines remain limited. We investigated the immunogenicity and adverse events of the third dose of mRNA vaccines in healthy adults., Methods: Volunteers vaccinated with two doses of the adenoviral vaccine (ChAdOx1) 12 weeks before were administered with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. These were divided into three groups, full-dose mRNA-1273 (group 1); half-dose mRNA-1273 (group 2); and full-dose BNT-162b2 (group 3). Primary outcomes included serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers and neutralizing antibody titers against B.1.1.7 (alpha), B.1.617.2 (delta), and B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of humoral and cellular immunity and vaccine-associated adverse events after the boost., Results: Totally 300 participants were recruited, and 298 participants were enrolled. For all three groups, an increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG geometric mean titers (30.12- to 71.80-fold) and neutralizing antibody titers against the alpha variant (69.80- to 173.23-folds), delta variant (132.69- to 324.63-folds), and omicron variant (135.36- to 222.37-folds) were observed on day 28. All groups showed robust T- and B-cell responses after boosting. Adverse events were overall mild and transient but with higher prevalence and severity in group 1 participants than in other groups., Conclusion: Third dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccines markedly enhanced cellular and humoral responses and were safe. Immunological responses and adverse events were higher in individuals receiving the full-dose mRNA-1273 vaccine, followed by a half-dose mRNA-1273 vaccine and BNT-162b2 vaccine., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article, (Copyright © 2022 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Efficacy and safety data of heterologous prime-boost vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains limited., Methods: We recruited adult volunteers for homologous or heterologous prime-boost vaccinations with adenoviral (ChAdOx1, AstraZeneca) and/or mRNA (mRNA-1273, Moderna) vaccines. Four groups of prime-boost vaccination schedules were designed: Group 1, ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 8 weeks apart; Group 2, ChAdOx1/mRNA-1273 8 weeks apart; Group 3, ChAdOx1/mRNA-1273 4 weeks apart; and Group 4, mRNA-1273/mRNA-1273 4 weeks apart. The primary outcome was serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and neutralizing antibody titers against B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.617.2 (delta) variants on day 28 after the second dose. Adverse events were recorded up until 84 days after the second dose., Results: We enrolled 399 participants with a median age of 41 years and 75% were female. On day 28 after the second dose, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers of both heterologous vaccinations (Group 2 and Group 3) were significantly higher than that of homologous ChAdOx1 vaccination (Group 1), and comparable with homologous mRNA-1273 vaccination (Group 4). The heterologous vaccination group had better neutralizing antibody responses against the alpha and delta variant as compared to the homologous ChAdOx1 group. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were mild and transient. AEs were less frequent when heterologous boosting was done at 8 weeks rather than at 4 weeks., Conclusion: Heterologous ChAdOx1/mRNA-1273 vaccination provided higher immunogenicity than homologous ChAdOx1 vaccination and comparable immunogenicity with the homologous mRNA-1273 vaccination. Our results support the safety and efficacy of heterologous prime-boost vaccination using the ChAdOx1 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05074368)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a serious complication and a major risk factor of increased mortality during hemodialysis (HD). However, predicting the occurrence of intradialytic blood pressure (BP) fluctuations clinically is difficult. This study aimed to develop an intelligent system with capability of predicting IDH., Methods: In developing and training the prediction models in the intelligent system, we used a database of 653 HD outpatients who underwent 55,516 HD treatment sessions, resulting in 285,705 valid BP records. We built models to predict IDH at the next BP check by applying time-dependent logistic regression analyses., Results: Our results showed the sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 81% for both nadir systolic BP (SBP) of <90 mmHg and <100 mmHg, suggesting good performance of our prediction models. We obtained similar results in validating via test data and data of newly enrolled patients (new-patient data), which is important for simulating prospective situations wherein dialysis staff are unfamiliar with new patients. This compensates for the retrospective nature of the BP records used in our study., Conclusion: The use of this validated intelligent system can identify patients who are at risk of IDH in advance, which may facilitate well-timed personalized management and intervention., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)