Search

Background: Solitary pulmonary nodules caused by nontuberculous mycobacteriosis are included as a category of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterium disease. Clinical characteristics, treatments and prognosis are not fully known because there are a few related reports., Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective study of 101 cases diagnosed as solitary nodular type of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis from January 2000 to March 2017 that underwent resection at 9 related facilities belonging to the Thoracic Surgery Study Group of Osaka., Results: The most common pathogen was Mycobacterium avium complex (n=77, 87.5%), followed by Mycobacterium kansasii (n=8, 9.1%). Chest computed tomography results showed subpleural locations that were difficult to distinguish from lung cancer. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed in 58 cases and positive results were obtained in 35 (60.3%), with an average maximum standardized uptake value of 3.87. The purpose of resection in most cases was for diagnosis. The surgical procedure was wedge resection in 87, segmentectomy in 3, and lobectomy in 11, while 77 underwent thoracoscopic surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 cases, though no infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteriosis were noted. The median observation period was 27 months. A worsened condition occurred in 10 (9.9%) with Mycobacterium avium complex , though none had local recurrence., Conclusions: Solitary pulmonary nodules due to nontuberculous mycobacteriosis is difficult to diagnose based on preoperative examination results or distinguish from lung cancer. Among the present cases, none had local complications or recurrence, even in those that underwent a wedge resection, thus postoperative chemotherapy was not considered necessary if a complete resection was performed. On the other hand, some cases showed reinfection after a long period following resection, thus patients should be informed of that future possibility., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-3108). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for breast cancer-derived pulmonary metastasis is controversial. This study aimed to assess the prognostic factors and implication of PM for metastatic breast cancer using a multi-institutional database., Methods: Clinical data of 253 females with pulmonary metastasis of breast cancer who underwent PM between 1982 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively., Results: The median patient age was 56 years. The median follow-up period was 5.4 years, and the median disease-free interval (DFI) was 4.8 years. The 5- and 10-year survival rates after PM were 64.9% and 50.4%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 10.1 years. Univariate analysis revealed that the period of PM before 2000, a DFI <36 months, lobectomy/pneumonectomy, large tumor size, and lymph node metastasis were predictive of a worse overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, a DFI <36 months, large tumor size, and lymph node metastasis remained significantly related to overall survival. The 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates after PM were 66.9% and 54.7%, respectively, and the median cancer-specific survival was 13.1 years. Univariate analyses revealed that the period of PM before 2000, DFI <36 months, lobectomy/pneumonectomy, large tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and incomplete resection were predictive of a worse cancer-specific survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a DFI <36 months, large tumor size and incomplete resection were significantly related to cancer-specific survival., Conclusions: As PM has limited efficacy in breast cancer, it should be considered an optional treatment for pulmonary metastasis of breast cancer., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1788). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)