Search

Background: The impact of estrogen and testosterone on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is well known, but the role of the gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin (PRL) to some extent remain less studied., Objectives: To explore the angiogenic potential of gonadotropins on endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs)., Methods: We examined the effects of various doses of gonadotropins on ECFCs obtained from cord blood by assessing colony number, proliferation, migration, and sprouting ability. Moreover, we studied thrombin generation in ECFCs exposed to gonadotropins by performing a thrombin generation assay. Finally, we determined the levels of circulating gonadotropins in 30 men, to exclude the effect of estrogen, with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD), in comparison with age- and sex-matched controls., Results: Exposure to FSH, LH, or PRL resulted in an increase in ECFC migration but showed no effect on proliferation or ECFC commitment from cord blood mononuclear cells. Using a three-dimensional fibrin gel assay, we showed that ECFC sprouting was significantly enhanced by gonadotropins. Exposure to FSH also increased the thrombin generation of ECFCs exposed to FSH. Finally, FSH and LH levels in men with LEAD were higher than those in controls., Conclusion: Gonadotropins increase ECFC-related angiogenesis and may be involved in thrombin generation in cardiovascular disease. Gonadotropins may act as biomarkers; moreover, we hypothesize that gonadotropin-blocking strategies may be a novel interesting therapeutic approach in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease., (© 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease associated with vascular inflammation and endothelial injury., Objectives: To correlate circulating angiogenic markers vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), placental growth factor (PlGF), and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) to in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 adult patients., Methods: Consecutive ambulatory and hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection were enrolled. VEGF-A, PlGF, and FGF-2 were measured in each patient ≤48 h following admission., Results: The study enrolled 237 patients with suspected COVID-19: 208 patients had a positive diagnostic for COVID-19, of whom 23 were mild outpatients and 185 patients hospitalized after admission. Levels of VEGF-A, PlGF, and FGF-2 significantly increase with the severity of the disease (P < .001). Using a logistic regression model, we found a significant association between the increase of FGF-2 or PlGF and mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.07-1.16], P < .001 for FGF-2 and OR 1.07 95% CI [1.04-1.10], P < .001 for PlGF) while no association were found for VEGF-A levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and we identified PlGF above 30 pg/ml as the best predictor of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Survival analysis for PlGF confirmed its interest for in-hospital mortality prediction, by using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve (P = .001) and a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted to age, body mass index, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (3.23 95% CI [1.29-8.11], P = .001)., Conclusion: Angiogenic factor PlGF is a relevant predictive factor for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. More than a biomarker, we hypothesize that PlGF blocking strategies could be a new interesting therapeutic approach in COVID-19., (© 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Introduction: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of thrombosis and mortality despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. There is equipoise regarding the optimal dose of anticoagulant intervention in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and consequently, immediate answers from high-quality randomized trials are needed., Methods: The World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was searched on June 17, 2020 for randomized controlled trials comparing increased dose to standard dose anticoagulant interventions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Two authors independently screened the full records for eligibility and extracted data in duplicate., Results: A total of 20 trials were included in the review. All trials are open label, 5 trials use an adaptive design, 1 trial uses a factorial design, 2 trials combine multi-arm parallel group and factorial designs in flexible platform trials, and at least 15 trials have multiple study sites. With individual target sample sizes ranging from 30 to 3000 participants, the pooled sample size of all included trials is 12 568 participants. Two trials include only intensive care unit patients, and 10 trials base patient eligibility on elevated D-dimer levels. Therapeutic intensity anticoagulation is evaluated in 14 trials. All-cause mortality is part of the primary outcome in 14 trials., Discussion: Several trials evaluate different dose regimens of anticoagulant interventions in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Because these trials compete for sites and study participants, a collaborative effort is needed to complete trials faster, conduct pooled analyses and bring effective interventions to patients more quickly., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Aims: Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy (thombotripsy) allows the accurate fractionation of a distant thrombus. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive thrombotripsy using a robotic assisted and high frequency ultrasound approach to recanalize proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a swine model., Methods: Occlusive thrombosis was obtained with a dual jugular and femoral endoveinous approach. The therapeutic device was composed of a 2.25 MHz focused transducer centered by a linear ultrasound probe, and a robotic arm. The feasibility, security, and efficacy (venous channel patency) assessment after thrombotripsy was performed on 13 pigs with acute occluded DVT. To assess the mid-term efficacy of this technique, 8 pigs were followed up for 14 days after thrombotripsy and compared with 8 control pigs. The primary efficacy endpoint was the venous patency. Safety was assessed by the search for local vessel wall injury and pulmonary embolism., Results: We succeeded in treating all pigs except two with no accessible femoral vein. After median treatment duration of 23 minutes of cavitation, all treated DVT were fully recanalized acutely. At 14 days, in the treated group, six of the eight pigs had a persistent patent vein and two pigs had a venous reocclusion. In the control group all pigs had a persistent venous occlusion. At sacrifice, no local vein nor arterial wall damage were observed as well as no evidence of pulmonary embolism in all pigs., Conclusion: High frequency thrombotripsy seems to be effective and safe for non-invasive venous recanalization of DVT., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with cardiovascular complications and coagulation disorders., Objectives: To explore the coagulopathy and endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 patients., Methods: The study analyzed clinical and biological profiles of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection at admission, including hemostasis tests and quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CECs)., Results: Among 96 consecutive COVID-19-suspected patients fulfilling criteria for hospitalization, 66 were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19-positive patients were more likely to present with fever (P = .02), cough (P = .03), and pneumonia at computed tomography (CT) scan (P = .002) at admission. Prevalence of D-dimer >500 ng/mL was higher in COVID-19-positive patients (74.2% versus 43.3%; P = .007). No sign of disseminated intravascular coagulation were identified. Adding D-dimers >500 ng/mL to gender and pneumonia at CT scan in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis significantly increased area under the curve for COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19-positive patients had significantly more CECs at admission (P = .008) than COVID-19-negative ones. COVID-19-positive patients treated with curative anticoagulant prior to admission had fewer CECs (P = .02) than those without. Interestingly, patients treated with curative anticoagulation and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers had even fewer CECs (P = .007)., Conclusion: Curative anticoagulation could prevent COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and endothelial lesion., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)