1. The Value of Lung Ultrasound to Detect the Early Pleural and Pulmonary Pathologies in Nonhospitalized <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19‐Suspected Cases in a Population With a Low Prevalence of <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 Infection: A Prospective Study in 297 Subjects
- Author
-
Ehsan Safai Zadeh, Evelyn Martin, Christian Görg, Corinna Trenker, Birgit Wollenberg, Björn Beutel, Christoph F. Dietrich, and Katharina Paulina Huber
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,business.industry ,Pleural effusion ,Population ,Ultrasound ,Disease ,medicine.disease ,Lung ultrasound ,Internal medicine ,Ambulatory ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,business ,Prospective cohort study ,education ,Pathological - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the value of B-mode lung ultrasound (LUS) for the early diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in nonhospitalized COVID-19 suspected cases in a population with a low prevalence of disease. METHODS: From April 2020 to June 2020, in an ambulatory testing center for COVID-19-suspected cases, 297 subjects were examined by LUS before a nasopharyngeal swab was taken for a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The following LUS findings were defined as pathological ultrasound findings and were analyzed: the presence of 1) pleural effusion, 2) B-lines, 3) fragmented visceral pleura, 4) consolidation, and 5) air bronchogram in the consolidation. The LUS findings were compared with the RT-PCR test results. RESULTS: The result of the RT-PCR test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was positive in 11 and negative in 286 subjects, and the prevalence of COVID-19 infection in the study participants was 3.7%. On LUS, a pathological finding could be detected in 56/297 (18.9%) study participants. The LUS revealed a sensitivity of 27.3%, a specificity of 81.5%, a positive predictive value of 5.4%, a negative predictive value of 96.7%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 79.9% for the identification of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: For the identification of COVID-19 infection, LUS is highly sensitive to the patient spectrum and to the prevalence of the disease. Due to the low diagnostic performance in nonhospitalized COVID-19 cases in low-prevalence areas, LUS cannot be considered to be an adequate method for making a diagnosis in this group.
- Published
- 2021