Search

Purpose: We evaluated the strategy for repeat biopsy of patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without concurrent carcinoma detected on prostate needle biopsy., Materials and Methods: Of 1,275 consecutive patients undergoing prostate needle biopsy 61 were identified with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia but without concurrent prostate carcinoma. Of the 61 patients 53 had undergone repeat biopsy. The medical records, transrectal ultrasound, and operative and pathological reports of these patients were reviewed., Results: Repeat biopsy was done in 53 patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yielding carcinoma in 15, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without carcinoma in 8 and benign tissue in 30. The yield of carcinoma from repeat biopsy of a prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia site was 8.3% (7 of 84 sites). A total of 18 sites of carcinoma was detected by repeat biopsy of a previous random biopsy site (8), a prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia site only (5), a transrectal ultrasound nodule (3), a palpable nodule and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia site (1), and a transrectal ultrasound nodule and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia site (1). Carcinoma was as frequently detected by repeat biopsy of a prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia site (6 patients) as by random repeat biopsy (6 patients)., Conclusions: Repeat prostate needle biopsy of patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia should include random repeat biopsy and repeat biopsy of transrectal ultrasound abnormalities as well as previous sites of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

The sixteenth case of bilateral ureteral obstruction with anuria secondary to an abdominal aortic aneurysm with perianeurysmal fibrosis is presented. The details of this case clearly indicate the need for a combined vascular and urologic approach to patients with this disorder. A complete preoperative evaluation, including excretory urography, retrograde pyeloureterography, aortography and, when indicated, venacavography, may determine renal and vascular abnormalities that will allow a more definitive and successful management of this difficult problem. Furthermore, we believe that the use of computed tomography is an invaluable tool to define this retroperitoneal disease process and its precise relationship to the ureters.

We herein describe 9 patients with non-opaque calculi and 3 patients with soft tissue filling defects in the renal pelvis studied by ultrasound. The calculi varied in size from 1.5 cm. to staghorn calculi. All stones were imaged satisfactorily by ultrasound, allowing the diagnosis of stone to be made with confidence. Ultrasonic differentiation of renal pelvic filling defects proved to be a simple, reliable, non-invasive method to differentiate these clinically perplexing lesions.