Search

Your search keyword '"Paddock, Lisa E"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Paddock, Lisa E" Journal journal of urology
9 results on '"Paddock, Lisa E"'

1. Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiotherapy With Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost vs Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Five-year Results From a Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Study

Author

De, Brian, primary, Pasalic, Dario, additional, Barocas, Daniel A., additional, Wallis, Christopher J. D., additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Zhao, Zhiguo, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Tang, Chad, additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, O’Neil, Brock B., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Hoffman, Karen E., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Association between Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer and Mental Health Outcomes

Author

Luckenbaugh, Amy N., primary, Wallis, Christopher J. D., additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Wittmann, Daniela, additional, Klaassen, Zachary, additional, Zhao, Zighuo, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Laviana, Aaron A., additional, Conwill, Ralph, additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, O’Neil, Brock B., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Hoffman, Karen E., additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Barocas, Daniel A., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Patient-Reported Financial Toxicity Associated with Contemporary Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Author

Stone, Benjamin V., primary, Laviana, Aaron A., additional, Luckenbaugh, Amy N., additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Zhao, Zhiguo, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Conwill, Ralph, additional, Hoffman, Karen, additional, Joyce, Daniel D., additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, O’Neil, Brock B., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Barocas, Daniel A., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the CEASAR Study

Author

Reisz, Peter A., primary, Laviana, Aaron A., additional, Zhao, Zhiguo, additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Conwill, Ralph, additional, Hoffman, Karen, additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, O’Neil, Brock B., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Barocas, Daniel A., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Interpretation of Domain Scores on the EPIC—How Does the Domain Score Translate into Functional Outcomes?

Author

Laviana, Aaron A., primary, Hernandez, Agustin, additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Zhao, Zhiguo, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Conwill, Ralph, additional, Hoffman, Karen, additional, Feurer, Irene D., additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, O'Neil, Brock B., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Barocas, Daniel A., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study

Author

Avulova, Svetlana, primary, Zhao, Zhiguo, additional, Lee, Daniel, additional, Huang, Li-Ching, additional, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Hoffman, Karen E., additional, Conwill, Ralph M., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Chen, Vivien, additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Hashibe, Mia, additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Stroup, Antoinette, additional, Resnick, Matthew J., additional, Penson, David F., additional, and Barocas, Daniel A., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples

Author

O’Neil, Brock, primary, Koyama, Tatsuki, additional, Alvarez, JoAnn, additional, Conwill, Ralph M., additional, Albertsen, Peter C., additional, Cooperberg, Matthew R., additional, Goodman, Michael, additional, Greenfield, Sheldon, additional, Hamilton, Ann S., additional, Hoffman, Karen E., additional, Hoffman, Richard M., additional, Kaplan, Sherrie H., additional, Stanford, Janet L., additional, Stroup, Antoinette M., additional, Paddock, Lisa E., additional, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, additional, Stephenson, Robert A., additional, Resnick, Matthew J., additional, Barocas, Daniel A., additional, and Penson, David F., additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Reply by Authors.

Author

De B, Pasalic D, Barocas DA, Wallis CJD, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Tang C, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Cooperberg MR, Hashibe M, O'Neil BB, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Penson DF, and Hoffman KE

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples.

Author

O'Neil B, Koyama T, Alvarez J, Conwill RM, Albertsen PC, Cooperberg MR, Goodman M, Greenfield S, Hamilton AS, Hoffman KE, Hoffman RM, Kaplan SH, Stanford JL, Stroup AM, Paddock LE, Wu XC, Stephenson RA, Resnick MJ, Barocas DA, and Penson DF

Subjects
Aged, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Prospective Studies, Prostatectomy adverse effects, Robotic Surgical Procedures adverse effects, SEER Program, Treatment Outcome, United States epidemiology, Prostatectomy methods, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods
Abstract

Purpose: Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy has largely replaced open radical prostatectomy for the surgical management of prostate cancer despite conflicting evidence of superiority with respect to disease control or functional sequelae. Using population cohort data, in this study we examined sexual and urinary function in men undergoing open radical prostatectomy vs those undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy., Materials and Methods: Subjects surgically treated for prostate cancer were selected from 2 large population based prospective cohort studies, the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study (enrolled 1994 to 1995) and the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (enrolled 2011 to 2012). Subjects completed baseline, 6-month and 12-month standardized patient reported outcome measures. Main outcomes were between-group differences in functional outcome scores at 6 and 12 months using linear regression, and adjusting for baseline function, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate outcomes between patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy within and across CEASAR and PCOS., Results: The combined cohort consisted of 2,438 men, 1,505 of whom underwent open radical prostatectomy and 933 of whom underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Men treated with robotic assisted radical prostatectomy reported better urinary function at 6 months (mean difference 3.77 points, 95% CI 1.09-6.44) but not at 12 months (1.19, -1.32-3.71). Subjects treated with robotic assisted radical prostatectomy also reported superior sexual function at 6 months (8.31, 6.02-10.56) and at 12 months (7.64, 5.25-10.03). Sensitivity analyses largely supported the sexual function findings with inconsistent support for urinary function results., Conclusions: This population based study reveals that men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy likely experience less decline in early urinary continence and sexual function than those undergoing open radical prostatectomy. The clinical meaning of these differences is uncertain and longer followup will be required to establish whether these benefits are durable., (Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results